1437
Comments (22)
sorted by:
22
Junosu 22 points ago +22 / -0

According to their website, "Your entire selection is driven out of a single database." and it's all "fully auditable". So let's run audits on EVERY place that software was used.

6
K-Harbour 6 points ago +6 / -0

“Fully Auditable” —- Bet can not confirm that Jane Smith voted for Trump.

11
bonerdog 11 points ago +11 / -0

UofM is a liberal stronghold. If this is coming from a professor there then this is great news for us.

9
K-Harbour 9 points ago +9 / -0

Unless a set up to debunk and discredit and minimalize. Then the voting company later provides a big research grant....

That’s how it works in academia.

Company is public ally in trouble....a professor spins the damage in a weave of words....professor gets funding for some pet project....University rewards professor for bringing fame to the university and private sector funds....

8
emperors_apprentice 8 points ago +8 / -0

fuck the education system to death.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
permissible_missile 4 points ago +4 / -0

It doesn't matter. There are lefties with enough integrity to care about this, even if theoretically they only care because they're smart enough to know that the machines can be used against them, too.

Us computer people have been warning about this for decades.

6
K-Harbour 6 points ago +6 / -0

U of M is pretty left wing.....

6
Dallasguy 6 points ago +6 / -0

It is not a bug, it is a feature.

5
MAGA_____bitches 5 points ago +5 / -0

More like they programmed in a back door so they can manipulate votes on the fly

4
itbj2 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is no way it was a design flaw. These machines are hooked up to the internet and they were manipulated. Someone ended up changing the wrong county or added a extra 0 as to how many votes to change. This thing alone could give trump the state. Every vote that was changed put trump up by 2 so if they changed 100K votes it gives Trump 200K.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
1777 4 points ago +4 / -0

General McInerney warned us about this 3days ago. The person that designed this software, to ID jihad’s (years ago), noticed it being used for Biden to screw over Bernie in the primary. This isn’t on the software company. It’s on the CIA.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Cbllbc 3 points ago +3 / -0

Btw, their website shows an example of the digital code used on ballots. In this case it is a QR code. In other cases, I've seen states use barcodes.

This doesn't mean that the whole watermark/blockchain rumor is true. But, if anyone wanted to investigate what digital identifiers states actually use, that would probably get them closer to the right direction.

Editing to add one more comment. Good to know this glitched software is available in every swing state, including Virginia. If you download their brochure, you can see the things I am mentioning.

2
WacoKid90 2 points ago +2 / -0

dominion is used in GA too

2
K-Harbour 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKj15Ag/is-dominion-software-throwing-th/c/

Is Dominion Software Throwing the Election to Biden?

2
Raffles 2 points ago +2 / -0

A "technical design flaw" that seemingly only disadvantages one side, how very convenient.

1
PinkPlacenta 1 point ago +1 / -0

technical intentional design flaw

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Sweden_wuz_Rite 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no such thing as a Glitch, it's a Propaganda term.

Someone Fucked up, intentionally or not, it didn't happen by divine intervention...