Hey folks, it's your boy Rai....er... zettapede here with an important announcement:
We're assembling the biggest dump of archives, links, videos, and other data on the election tampering. Put it in the comments below - emphasis on specific, direct evidence of cheating.
Let's turn this into a resource for redpilling the "Where's the evidence?" Normies who've never researched a fact in their lives.
Remember to archive and download all evidence! (And if someone posts an unarchived link or un-downloaded video, make a copy and reply with the link!)
Come at me bro!
LINKS TO GET YOU STARTED
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpBG03og/archive-dump-to-be-filled-as-lin/
https://twitter.com/jamesokeefeiii/status/1324845160358940673?s=21
https://twitter.com/EricTrump/status/1324337951866802178
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKZuGiT/benfords-law-courtesy-of-4chan-t/c/
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKeTDhw/wow-what-a-turnout-election--105/c/
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1324793898724720646?s=21
https://twitter.com/kimKBaltimore/status/1324563483078307840?s=19
https://mobile.twitter.com/Pismo_B/status/1324445619474235393?s=19
My grandmother has absentee ballots that were sent to the couple they bought their property from 40 years ago. Can someone give me a link to where to submit it??
djt45.co/stopfraud
Assuming she didn’t use them, this just shows how ridiculous voter roles are in some states. This is well known, but It doesn’t prove fraud. Fitton has been fighting the good fight to get rolls cleaned up, but this won’t help Trump now. We need proof that illegal ballots were cast to win this fight.
I know. https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKdJAhA/nothing-to-see-here--just-a-list/c/
But ballots being sent to wrong address doesn’t get us there is my point.
Failures to properly account for legally eligible voters is still malfeasance
Ridiculous. It's much easier to cheat than it is to get illegal votes thrown out in court.
We could have all the evidence in the world, but the courts could say it's not definitive and/or they don't know which/how many ballots to throw out.
Correct. That is why we need clear, irrefutable proof of fraud. Dead voters are most obvious, and combined with other circumstantial evidence could convince a court.
We need to also consider this from another angle:
We need to figure out the total number of THOSE TYPES of people (metnioned above, the case of where a person is still on the voting roll despite there being no way for them to even vote)
They're being used to pad the denominator of "elibible voters" and if we remove them then the turnout rate (already suspiciously high) will tick up even higher.
In places like Wi where they claim 87% turnout, but keep in mind they might be including the type of people mentioned above, in the denominator. Num of people that voted/ eligible voters (including those people that we already know shouldn't be receiving ballots)
remove them from the denominator and the turnout rate will tick higher. 87% is already questionable but what if we get it to show 100% or higher? Lol. Would it be believable if were said "After controlling for households that shouldn't have received ballots, such as Nancy Wilkins who moved to Florida, we discovered that 100% of the remaining eligible voters voted in this election". Huge red flag then.
Another way of saying this is they are using these strange people that appear on voter rolls to pad the denominator so that the overall fraction remains high (80+%) but doesn't tick over 100.
We need to look at the aggreate stats - find the total number of 'elibible voters' in each state and subtract the suspicous ones that we know shouldn't be elligible (eg sombody that hasn't even been there) and remove them from the denominator. then we will have the actual turnout rate, which , the highest that number gets should be 1.
https://defendyourballot.formstack.com/forms/voter_fraud?utm_source=graphic