Hey folks, it's your boy Rai....er... zettapede here with an important announcement:
We're assembling the biggest dump of archives, links, videos, and other data on the election tampering. Put it in the comments below - emphasis on specific, direct evidence of cheating.
Let's turn this into a resource for redpilling the "Where's the evidence?" Normies who've never researched a fact in their lives.
Remember to archive and download all evidence! (And if someone posts an unarchived link or un-downloaded video, make a copy and reply with the link!)
Come at me bro!
LINKS TO GET YOU STARTED
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpBG03og/archive-dump-to-be-filled-as-lin/
https://twitter.com/jamesokeefeiii/status/1324845160358940673?s=21
https://twitter.com/EricTrump/status/1324337951866802178
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKZuGiT/benfords-law-courtesy-of-4chan-t/c/
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKeTDhw/wow-what-a-turnout-election--105/c/
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1324793898724720646?s=21
https://twitter.com/kimKBaltimore/status/1324563483078307840?s=19
https://mobile.twitter.com/Pismo_B/status/1324445619474235393?s=19
On Benfords Law all here
Biden data doesn't fit Benford law:
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFtEjwI/bidens-vote-tallies-violate-benf/c/
https://mobile.twitter.com/statsguyphd/status/1324352213595181059
https://mobile.twitter.com/toad_spotted/status/1324377988499210240
Posobiec tweeted Benford law too:
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1324551760959229958
https://testingbenfordslaw.com
Someone said "It’s been used to detect voter fraud as well as financial fraud. Most famously Iranian elections in 2009 and Enron."
Video of How to Detect Fraud Using Benford's Law:
https://youtu.be/7uhAn19V1EY
The video maker says:
Take it for what it's worth.
Here was another comment:
Sloppiest fraud I've ever seen. I've gotten calls from distressed Nigerian princes more convincing than this.
Convenient, now mainstream media is saying it can't be used in elections. If there was no propaganda they wouldn't have to do this.
To be fair for 4 years they said the Russians rigged the elections and now they're saying it can't be rigged.
Openly lying? The media? Get out of here.
Yes, it was extremely sloppy. I think they panicked when they saw the strength of the FL win and the fast call there. That's when the plan to "pause" counting (but really just to kick out observers) kicked in. The early AZ call by Fox was to distract.
Next step, dump thousands of ballots with only Biden marked and no other candidates/races marked.
That's what makes it all so fucky. Dems getting beaten downballot suggests that the massive dumps were Biden-only ballots.
In the real election Trump won in a fucking landslide, which I guess is the good news. The majority of America seems awake.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-analysis/article/benfords-law-and-the-detection-of-election-fraud/3B1D64E822371C461AF3C61CE91AAF6D
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-analysis/article/comment-on-benfords-law-and-the-detection-of-election-fraud/BC29680D8B5469A54C7C9D865029FE7C
They don't even need to be careful anymore. Its all a fix
just to clarify, it isnt that numbers get smaller -
It is that the FIRST DIGIT in a number will most likely be a small digit as opposed to a larger one. This works when you have many numbers which span over orders of magnitudes.
It doesnt work for human heights, but it would work for stock market numbers for example.
Don't want to derail from the voter fraud conversation, but isn't it odd that the covid data in https://testingbenfordslaw.com/world-covid-count doesn't follow Benford's law?
It's not nearly as abnormal as Biden's votes reporting.
The problem that I see cropping up is that Biden's votes as a whole (counting the whole country) follow Benford's law. It's that many critical counties suspiciously don't
redditors are already trying to get ahead of this by posting the overall Benford-ness of the candidates so they can say "SeE iTs aN hoNeST eLeCtiON" . It's another form
thats still pretty close though, but certainly not perfect.
Deaths are pretty far off though. https://twitter.com/SaurabhMaduskar/status/1290483885462056966
A little suspicious.
covid reporting has a lot of hands, making different calls (is this or is this not a covid death? depends on the doctor) that are all over the place, the actual data gathering is a gigantic hole unto itself.
Bad testing creates real number that will pass bedfords
The Bedford's Law and 89% Wisconsin turnout stats are important evidence weapons in demonstrating our case to the public and in the legal battle to come. RUN THE SAME ANALYSES ON EVERY CRITICAL CITY/STATE. If Biden fails Bedford's in 5 major cities, that's EXPONENTIALLY more damning than 1.
Whoever ran these analyses, I urge them or anyone else to run them again on all the critical cities and states. META-DATA analyses like these are very powerful because they're not as anecdotal as "we found one guy who stole some ballots". If you can show consistent irregularities in the entire system, that's extremely damning and powerful, and rightfully so.
That's called criminal conspiracy. It's muuuch more serious.
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFxlm7g/statistically-significant-milwau/c/
Now why would Wikipedia lock that article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford's_law
They've been doing this kinda thing a lot recently.
over/under on when it's "revised"?
The law is named after white supremacist Frank Benford...
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1324352213595181059.html
Unrolled version of the statsguyphd analysis from twitter above.
This insider says targeting smaller elections is easier. I imagine same is true for precincts
https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-voter-fraud-with-mail-in-ballots/
You are right, I ran the same analysis on 2016 Hillary v Trump numbers in miluakee county by ward and they were essentially identical. To use benfords I’m fairly certain the dataset needs to scale across multiple orders of magnitude.
Unfortunately it’s looking like benfords is a false flag/ waste of energy.
Yeah, I feel that the whole 'statistical improbability' angle is not the one to keep digging. Its not really compelling besides to people who are really into statistics, which we know the left is not lol
Dead voters, video/proof of tampering, sworn testimony of backdating/fraud, machine 'glitches'/errors, paper trails, NSA records of conspiracy/fraud, etc are all much better angles of attack. Not that its going to stop anyone. Just my 2c
It doesn't matter what "the left" is compelled by; what matters is what prosecutors, judges, juries, and administrative officials are compelled by.
Still, improbability is just that, improbability. Its a sauce to add to some solid evidence, on its own I dont think holds up as evidence of anything specifcally. Ask some people you know yourself that are into numbers, polling data isnt financial documents, as wards and districts arent blocks of financial transactions, they are human drawn lines through certain neighborhoods and people act like humans, irrationally, and not directly corresponding to a specific curve.
Benford's law is used all the time in accounting - and thus judges are familiar with it. You are arguing to the court. It doesn't matter what the sheeple think.