Biden data doesn't fit Benford law:

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFtEjwI/bidens-vote-tallies-violate-benf/c/

https://mobile.twitter.com/statsguyphd/status/1324352213595181059

https://mobile.twitter.com/toad_spotted/status/1324377988499210240

Benford model predicts truly random numbers (in a string) get smaller over time in a data set. Trump data follows that trend. Biden data does not and is therefore "weird" and likely had human interference.

Posobiec tweeted Benford law too:

https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1324551760959229958

https://testingbenfordslaw.com

Someone said "It’s been used to detect voter fraud as well as financial fraud. Most famously Iranian elections in 2009 and Enron."

Video of How to Detect Fraud Using Benford's Law:

https://youtu.be/7uhAn19V1EY

The video maker says:

"Multiple firms have contacted us and we expect to be retained for an investigation."

Take it for what it's worth.

Here was another comment:

“Trump vote totals conform rather well to Benford's law, one of the first things you'd check in trying to determine whether there was fraud. Biden's fail miserably, and, what's more, the frequencies of leading digits for him are virtually symmetric about 5: exactly what you get if these were faked by those ignorant of Benford's law, and wanting to manufacture "average" looking numbers, those that begin with 4,5, or 6”