7899
ELECTION FRAUD EVIDENCE MAGATHREAD
posted ago by zettapede ago by zettapede +7901 / -2

Hey folks, it's your boy Rai....er... zettapede here with an important announcement:

We're assembling the biggest dump of archives, links, videos, and other data on the election tampering. Put it in the comments below - emphasis on specific, direct evidence of cheating.

Let's turn this into a resource for redpilling the "Where's the evidence?" Normies who've never researched a fact in their lives.

Remember to archive and download all evidence! (And if someone posts an unarchived link or un-downloaded video, make a copy and reply with the link!)

Come at me bro!

LINKS TO GET YOU STARTED

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpBG03og/archive-dump-to-be-filled-as-lin/

https://twitter.com/jamesokeefeiii/status/1324845160358940673?s=21

https://twitter.com/EricTrump/status/1324337951866802178

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKZuGiT/benfords-law-courtesy-of-4chan-t/c/

https://streamable.com/dti4dd

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKeTDhw/wow-what-a-turnout-election--105/c/

https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1324793898724720646?s=21

https://pastebin.com/zjz6nm6Q

https://twitter.com/kimKBaltimore/status/1324563483078307840?s=19

https://controlc.com/59945faa

https://mobile.twitter.com/Pismo_B/status/1324445619474235393?s=19

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xLfjFPvEL4BgLLpe1kFKqa2oujaQ1WaHGk61k__XHX4/htmlview#gid=2075906486

2002 comments
2002 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (2002)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 295 ▼
– Johnfox13 295 points ago +298 / -3

On Benfords Law all here

permalink save report block reply
▲ 188 ▼
– dontUseVinegerAsLube 188 points ago +189 / -1

Biden data doesn't fit Benford law:

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpFtEjwI/bidens-vote-tallies-violate-benf/c/

https://mobile.twitter.com/statsguyphd/status/1324352213595181059

https://mobile.twitter.com/toad_spotted/status/1324377988499210240

Benford model predicts truly random numbers (in a string) get smaller over time in a data set. Trump data follows that trend. Biden data does not and is therefore "weird" and likely had human interference.

Posobiec tweeted Benford law too:

https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1324551760959229958

https://testingbenfordslaw.com

Someone said "It’s been used to detect voter fraud as well as financial fraud. Most famously Iranian elections in 2009 and Enron."

Video of How to Detect Fraud Using Benford's Law:

https://youtu.be/7uhAn19V1EY

The video maker says:

"Multiple firms have contacted us and we expect to be retained for an investigation."

Take it for what it's worth.

Here was another comment:

“Trump vote totals conform rather well to Benford's law, one of the first things you'd check in trying to determine whether there was fraud. Biden's fail miserably, and, what's more, the frequencies of leading digits for him are virtually symmetric about 5: exactly what you get if these were faked by those ignorant of Benford's law, and wanting to manufacture "average" looking numbers, those that begin with 4,5, or 6”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– person1374 16 points ago +16 / -0

The Bedford's Law and 89% Wisconsin turnout stats are important evidence weapons in demonstrating our case to the public and in the legal battle to come. RUN THE SAME ANALYSES ON EVERY CRITICAL CITY/STATE. If Biden fails Bedford's in 5 major cities, that's EXPONENTIALLY more damning than 1.

Whoever ran these analyses, I urge them or anyone else to run them again on all the critical cities and states. META-DATA analyses like these are very powerful because they're not as anecdotal as "we found one guy who stole some ballots". If you can show consistent irregularities in the entire system, that's extremely damning and powerful, and rightfully so.

permalink parent save report block reply