2110
Comments (53)
sorted by:
52
FalconPunch 52 points ago +52 / -0

LOL just verified this. Holy shit!

6
Stepheddit 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't see it...wait yes I do now. I had to update the dates shown on the right side.

1
TheGreatAmerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

How did you verify? I ordered the records by date of birth, and the latest date is 09/28/2002.

1
FalconPunch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clicked "View Source Data" (because I'm anal), which brought me here: https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-General-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/mcba-yywm

Sort by Birth descending and scroll till you hit Ballot Requests 491 to 504

31
Meatbank84 31 points ago +31 / -0

How soon do we find somebody's cat named Scrambles the death dealer that voted?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
5
ztrich007 5 points ago +5 / -0

But Scrambles ain’t gonna take our president

29
Rickshawrick 29 points ago +29 / -0

I'm starting to understand where a lot of Biden's campaign funds went. He wasn't having rallies. During the tough Covid times, buying votes became easy.

12
Noserotonin 12 points ago +12 / -0

Well, they’ve been doing that in Minneapolis and we have it on tape.

9
daty_dato 9 points ago +9 / -0

As easy as buying Twitter followers. Just ask Joe how.

9
Dragofireheart 9 points ago +9 / -0

Fuck, if Biden had money to spend on kids, he wouldn't pay them to vote...

6
Rickshawrick 6 points ago +6 / -0

you got me there!

19
Rickshawrick 19 points ago +19 / -0

Left still playing checkers. You have to admire the thought process. If we always check the graveyards, we'll never check the underaged. Sound logic.

6
yvjin 6 points ago +6 / -0

this is some negative 2D checkers

3
CodeMonkey 3 points ago +3 / -0

1D Tic Tac Toe

3
CanadianTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

.25D

3
hisnamewasjeff 3 points ago +3 / -0

Quick, someone call Jack Dorsey, he seems like the type of guy which can help with minors

2
DeboonkedFact 2 points ago +2 / -0

*help himself with minors

9
SkeletorsTeeth 9 points ago +9 / -0

Cmon...if youre gonna cheat dont be this freaking dumb

8
fapoo 8 points ago +8 / -0

youth vote turned out this year then?

7
Wakanda4Trump 7 points ago +7 / -0

I was joking when I said everyone in America would get a ballot even the children. Lol

6
Topcold 6 points ago +6 / -0

edit: found it. seem like they added a filter on that link. need to go to the source link here row 504 & 506 when sorted by date of borth

3
zardios 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not in the dataset that the link points to, but if you check the full dataset it's still there.

1
3sigma_gal_for_Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Make sure to change the date-of-birth filters on the upper right side. I had to change the range to include the 2020 birthday.

6
Choppermagic 6 points ago +6 / -0

6 month and 14 year olds? Dam, Hunter's dream demographic!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Dragofireheart 5 points ago +5 / -0

Jesus christ, the sheer hubris and laziness of Democrats

5
sjw_injection 5 points ago +5 / -0

How were they mailed and returned in 3 days? Because it was never mailed out.

Maybe we can catch them never actually mailing them out

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
IncredibleMrE1 3 points ago +3 / -0

OP u/bucky_the_wonder_pig, did you add this to the election fraud magathread yet?

3
hisnamewasjeff 3 points ago +3 / -0

SEND THIS TO TRUMP'S TEAM

DID ANYONE SEND THIS?

SEND IT!!

3
Landcruzer94 3 points ago +3 / -0

I downloaded the raw file and only found DOB up to 2002

3
bucky_the_wonder_pig [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have to set the birthdate filter correctly on the site to include post-2002 dates.

2
Landcruzer94 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did that too. 2002 to 2020 and the only thing that popped up on the filter was 2002 items, both on the site and the CSV data

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Dtom13 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same. There isn't any result for this on the website, and I pasted the exact link into my browser.

4
bucky_the_wonder_pig [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

You have to set the birthdate filter correctly on the site to include post-2002 dates.

2
Pat_Quinn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was looking at that database and it said people born in 1800 received mail-in ballots is this some clerical thing that was never updated, there is quite a few

1
TheGreatAmerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

"The reason some birth dates will display as 1/1/1800 is due to confidentiality reasons of the registered votes."

2
Nogozone 2 points ago +2 / -0

This just proves that when it comes to voter fraud, If you can think it then they fucking did it!

2
Green_Card_Holder 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would like to see the 6 month old signature!

2
repoman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone have access to vet records? Seriously...

2
HatnNewLognReqs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn. Should've registered my kids too

2
patriotblend 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shoot. A pede wrote a little program to scan through old//suspect/dead Michigan voters. I don't think kids were included in that dataset!

Dammit I need to learn to code

1
Ameronaut 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they're going to cheat, they could at least try to hide it

1
DingDongDitch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats love em young!

1
MagaCountry 1 point ago +1 / -0

of course democrats or NF

1
InterloperKO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those were in dog years, Bigot !!!

1
arandoperosn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does this remind anyone else of Sideshow Bob's mayoral campaign?

1
Bramble 1 point ago +1 / -0

How the fuck.

Look, even if this person somehow has the same name, and the same birth month as someone previously, there is no way this has happened THIS MANY TIMES to be a clerical errors.

A dozen instances I buy. Thousands I do not.

1
NewUser101 1 point ago +1 / -0

How exactly were they registered to begin with? There should be a paper trail for that; follow it to the source and you'll find much, much more.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
hisnamewasjeff 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hunter's campaign with the 14 year olds was more successful than we expected!