8749
Comments (1611)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
106
WinnerPlaysTCU 106 points ago +107 / -1

This feels big. Is this big?

80
codesherpa 80 points ago +80 / -0

This is fucking huge!

41
IncredibleMrE1 41 points ago +41 / -0

YUUUUUGE. Possibly Rosie O'Donnell sized.

12
MrFrog3D 12 points ago +12 / -0

As big as this is........

3
InTheArmsOfThePepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Probably more like Amy Schumer.

Let's save Rosie for the motherload

4
zeeshopper 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'D LIKE TO TAKE SOME MONEY OUT OF HER FATASS POCKET

4
Worlox 4 points ago +4 / -0

That’s a fat roll

13
Sumarongi 13 points ago +14 / -1

Amy Schumer!

48
deleted 48 points ago +48 / -0
35
mixednuts86 35 points ago +35 / -0

It's a bit step. That's not to say the votes will or will not be invalidated. But forcing this level of accountability has got to have them shitting bricks in PA.

5
veteran299 5 points ago +5 / -0

or they wont give a fuck which will piss of SCOTUS even more. :)

25
Mixxy 25 points ago +25 / -0

This is just one humble pede's opinion but I think we'll look back on this as the moment where we turned the tide.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
4
Mixxy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pray it doesn't get to that point, but what you should really fear is that if the courts don't step in, nobody will do anything. A violent solution is still preferable to no solution.

9
Viewer01 9 points ago +9 / -0

Presumably their goal was to create such a mess of things that it’ll be impossible to see which to count and not. Thus forcing scotus to either toss them all or accept.