8749
Comments (1611)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
67
bighomiebeenchillin 67 points ago +68 / -1

the logical thing to assume that if they ignored the court order, then the supremes could potentially just invalidate ALL mail in ballots in the state. i mean surely that’s the only possible option right? PA cant just say oops we forgot and then be allowed to just let the ballot count stand right? lmao

34
OwnaLib87 34 points ago +34 / -0

A states vote is cast by a states elector, selected by the state legislature. Maybe it would just go to them.

21
Sumarongi 21 points ago +22 / -1

That’s probably what will end up happening

18
shitPostingChamp 18 points ago +19 / -1

And then we will win, and mine salt for all eternity

10
Cswanger22 10 points ago +10 / -0

That salt could cure cancer and bring back the babies the left killed with MuH ChOice

5
Slowsuby 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have hypertension already just thinking about it.

3
KS-76- 3 points ago +3 / -0

We're going to need a bigger boat.

1
thunderstorm 1 point ago +1 / -0

If by salt you mean complete and utter chaos? Yes.

12
PN_OShea 12 points ago +13 / -1

And brother, if this gets thrown to the state legislatures, that's going to be a whole new world of fight

11
zestanor 11 points ago +13 / -2

It would just be the contested states. PA’s legislature is Republican dominated in both houses, so there would be no fight.

12
leakmouth 12 points ago +13 / -1

Never underestimate the power of Republicans to be bribed and blackmailed, stab Trump in the back, and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory

3
PN_OShea 3 points ago +3 / -0

Understood. I'm just finding the irony humorous.

It's either that or load more mags.

6
richmomz 6 points ago +7 / -1

It will be an uphill battle for the dems though since most of these swing state legislatures have Republican majorities.

3
PN_OShea 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh my heart just bleeds for them...

Cry me a river. They'll be lucky if we're not screaming for tribunals if we get through this.

TREASON

1
ThatOtherGuyBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

All but Nevada I believe

17
NewUser101 17 points ago +17 / -0

This is one way to get a contingent election.

15
Flcentipede 15 points ago +15 / -0

It reads like there was no court order, just guidance from the secretary that SCOTUS assumed would be followed when they made previous decision not to rule before election with the understanding any constitutional violations could be remedied later. So I don’t think they violated a court order, bu5 Judges don’t like to feel mislead so this could be significant.

13
Aluminoti 13 points ago +14 / -1

Go with whatever the count was up until the first observer was denied entry

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0