8749 BREAKING FROM SCOTUS: Justice Alito has issued an Order than any ballots received after after 8pm on election day in PA be segregated and secured - and if counted, counted separately. There is a petition pending before SCOTUS. Alito orders opposing side to reply by 2p Saturday. (twitter.com) posted 159 days ago by Greg-2012 (context) 159 days ago by Greg-2012 +8749 / -0 1611 comments share 1611 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (1611) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 51 ▼ – kag_patriot 51 points 159 days ago +51 / -0 They shouldn't be, but we're not the ones who disenfranchised them. They were disenfranchised the moment their ballots were tainted by poll workers. permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – HockeyMom4Trump 4 points 159 days ago +4 / -0 All the voters in America were disenfranchised if they allow fraud in our election permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Brave1884 2 points 159 days ago +3 / -1 So what happens when they tell us all votes are mixed? His order straight up says it’s not legally binding order. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – kag_patriot 4 points 159 days ago +4 / -0 They toss the votes they can't track, or they redo the entire election for the state. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – WowStrongWinning 3 points 159 days ago +3 / -0 Where specifically does it say that is not a legally binding order? Why would a judge intervene in a matter, if it what he said wasn’t binding? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Brave1884 1 point 159 days ago +1 / -0 Right at the bottom of the order. It’s linked up top of this post permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – pray_for_kekistan 1 point 159 days ago +1 / -0 Alito says the PA officials are claiming it's not legally binding permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – WowStrongWinning 1 point 159 days ago +1 / -0 No it does not. You have no clue what you’re talking about. permalink parent save report block reply
They shouldn't be, but we're not the ones who disenfranchised them. They were disenfranchised the moment their ballots were tainted by poll workers.
All the voters in America were disenfranchised if they allow fraud in our election
So what happens when they tell us all votes are mixed? His order straight up says it’s not legally binding order.
They toss the votes they can't track, or they redo the entire election for the state.
Where specifically does it say that is not a legally binding order? Why would a judge intervene in a matter, if it what he said wasn’t binding?
Right at the bottom of the order. It’s linked up top of this post
Alito says the PA officials are claiming it's not legally binding
No it does not. You have no clue what you’re talking about.