2462
Comments (73)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
RedBlue 3 points ago +8 / -5

So yeah that's why I'm kind of black pilled. Basically the entire time we're telegraphing what we want done while we wait on the court, they're just sitting there mixing in surprise ballots that can never be sorted out?...

9
Roadrash 9 points ago +9 / -0

Maybe you two should understand that a correction can’t be made for something that hasnt gone wrong yet. The fucking scotus can’t issue injunctions for shit that hasn’t happened, and lawsuits can’t be filed for crimes not committed.

4
RedBlue 4 points ago +4 / -0

So you're saying it's part of the plan to wait until they actually mix in harvested ballots or whatever - that's the only point at which you WOULD have a case. Okay, I get that. But again, what the fuck are we supposed to do if they're just mixing them into the stack of w/e bullshit? How do we get those out?

16
Roadrash 16 points ago +16 / -0

This reverses the burden of proof from what you think it is. The corrupt polling places must now account for everything according to legal timelines. They’re nowhere near smart enough to do that, no one is.

6
RedBlue 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can get onboard with this

6
MrWWonka 6 points ago +6 / -0

especially if they have mixed all the ballots from all dates together! good luck with that! Invalidated!

2
General_Kek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eli5 the reversing of burden of proof - perhaps I’m having trouble with terminology

2
KickingPugilist 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love you.

6
Mr-J 6 points ago +6 / -0

All the votes after election day will be voided