6306
Comments (417)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
176
Tookens 176 points ago +176 / -0

I would not bet against Sydney. She is no crackpot. She would not be saying this without having proof or utter confidence in a source that actually knows.

121
deleted 121 points ago +121 / -0
36
mixednuts86 36 points ago +36 / -0

Who? Ohhh.. bagpipe guy.

29
SpaceManBob 29 points ago +30 / -1

Don't be too hard on him, he's writing a very, VERY strongly-worded letter right now.

11
LaPastillaEscarlata 11 points ago +11 / -0

And we all LOOOOOVE those.

10
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 10 points ago +10 / -0

"Oh fuck, Barr is getting up. He's gonna do something!"

Barr furiously slams his fist down.

To Whom It May Concern,

This is gravely concerning.

Yours,

The Honorable William Fag Barr

6
Toys 6 points ago +6 / -0

Speaking of letters, I nearly shit a brick when Graham sent Trump's legal defense a letter worth half a million bucks. He could have saved himself some money if he bothered to do his fucking job in the senate, though.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
LiberalismIsTheVirus 17 points ago +17 / -0

I think it was Tuesday or Wednesday that Bannon said Trump wants to fire Wray and replace him with Powell. I could be wrong, but I think that's what he said.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
7
LiberalismIsTheVirus 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think they were proven true from the snowden documents. It even mentioned that Obama created I think. Someone sent me this earlier.

https://theamericanreport.org/category/home/the-hammer/

5
Tookens 5 points ago +5 / -0

FBI director doesn't actually require confirmation. It's more a courtesy than anything else.

15
OconusLurex 15 points ago +15 / -0

The way she says, "well, we've been trying to get their attention" was such a polite way of hinting at just how useless the DOJ is.

6
Toys 6 points ago +6 / -0

"We'll have to go through the federal courts, I guess" (or something to that effect). Not so subtle or polite, lol.

11
IncredibleMrE1 11 points ago +11 / -0

A pede can dream.

10
_Sully_ 10 points ago +10 / -0

Word on the street, FBI Director.

83
ShittRomney 83 points ago +83 / -0

She represents Michael Flynn. He knows all

38
MisterKag 38 points ago +38 / -0

Winner winner chicken dinner.

24
ShittRomney 24 points ago +24 / -0

Can't believe people forgot this

0
butte_weippe 0 points ago +5 / -5

isnt michael flynn anti trump now?

edit: was confusing him for michael cohen i think.

11
ShittRomney 11 points ago +11 / -0

In what world?

9
butte_weippe 9 points ago +9 / -0

i think i confused him for michael cohen

5
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nah Flynn is running with the Q crowd now lol

2
butte_weippe 2 points ago +2 / -0

i confusing him for michael cohen

2
Dashmoomoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Courtesy upvote. Flynn... for the win.

26
deleted 26 points ago +27 / -1
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
21
Toys 21 points ago +21 / -0

I'm a software engineer. I have been for nearly 20 years. This scenario they're trying to sell us makes no sense. Counting ballots is pretty easy. Scan paper, increment variable. That's about it. Adding the counts together is also simple addition. There's nothing beyond that. Reporting is likely a harder issue, but I mean Amazon handles far more transactions in an hour then this software handles in a single election so it's not that hard.

This is software that runs in a tightly controlled environment, on tightly controlled hardware, with tightly controlled inputs. We're not talking about software with millions of user interactions, where people can do stupid shit. This type of software environment is a dream for an engineer. There are no variables, and no human error, to worry about.

In short, if this "glitch" exists in a single county in MI, it exists in every state using this software. Also, this is not a bug. It's a feature. That's especially true if reports are accurate that this software was updated the morning of the election. Who the fuck in software would push an update the one and only day everyone in the nation is going to be using your software?

11
CornandSoybeans 11 points ago +11 / -0

China. China would push the software update.

10
NoahGav 10 points ago +10 / -0

if (vote == Trump) {

vote = Biden;

}

6
pithys 6 points ago +6 / -0

else { vote = Biden * 2; }

8
friendofno1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Imagine democrats modeling their election steal on a movie

7
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 7 points ago +7 / -0

They worship pop culture.

3
friendofno1 3 points ago +3 / -0

This sounds familiar, where have I heard this?

2
sackofwisdom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Somebody needs to deepfake this scene:

https://youtu.be/NnPBSy5FsOc

17
schiff_for_brains 17 points ago +17 / -0

She has access to Flynn’s network and security clearances. I really wasn’t taking a hammer and Scorecard too seriously but now that she’s talking about it those conspiracy theories hold a lot more water.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
Greatest_adventure 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think she's referring to pre-election ballots that were rigged to count for Biden by this surveillance software.

2
CornandSoybeans 2 points ago +2 / -0

What if yiu voted in person on Election Day for Trump, but I mailed a fake of your ballot in for Biden but it wasn't scanned till after your in person vote took place? Would it switch to Biden? Because if this is the case you wouldn't need to have very many mail in ballots canceling same day ballots at +1/-1 ratio.