27
Comments (8)
sorted by:
1
thebizkit23 1 point ago +2 / -1

He's right. What do you want him to say?

Until the evidence of fraud is made clear to us, it is what it is. Just wait till the evidence is brought to the courts.

1
tokenninja [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

What do I want him to say? I want him to say that he trusts Trump and the evidence provided thus far. I expect him to be ready to defend Trump with his mf life. Nothing less.

1
thebizkit23 1 point ago +1 / -0

No evidence has been made clear to us yet. Until then, all we can go is wait.

1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

What you want him to say is, essentially, "I am a blindly partisan hack. I have no judgment or sense of proportion, do not listen to me."

I submit that what he really said was far more persuasive.

0
tokenninja [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

You obviously are new to what’s going on.

1
BuffaloReaper94 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even worse, he's a one-eyed snake, and we all know what those do.

1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

What he said, two tweets:

If Trump loses, he loses. It was never an impossible outcome and we must accept the final results when it is over.

But the unfortunate reality is that there is very little trust in the process, where irregularities have been flagrant and transparency lacking.

It should not be partisan to suggest calmly that investigations occur and the court process plays out.

Americans need to be sure of the winner and loser. The winners should especially want that.


We spent 42 Million dollars on hostile, partisan lawyers to prove that DJT and his campaign did not collude with Russia.

Now, we should spend at least that much on hostile, partisan lawyers to find out whether the Democrats engaged in fraud.

1
IPreferDiamonds 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have doubted him ever since he appeared on SNL.