As a software engineer myself, I welcome the Twitter engineers getting hauled off. Me and the rest of us MAGA devs will go and fix that site and make it fair to use for everybody.
Could the monitoring be open sourced? Like each person would subscribe to a blacklist (or multiple) that would censor tweets according to that lists curators?
You mean what they're currently doing right now? I mean I suppose it's possible. I'm not sure I get what you're going for with this question but I think it's likely they have human moderators squashing tweets and trends.
If you're talking more about making Twitter a fair platform. Your description touches on how Minds.com does their jury system for monitoring content.
Imagine if you posted some low-energy BS here on .win
If we had a jury system, after some people reported the post it would be shown to 10-20 currently active users and you would hit a button that says "Post should be removed" or "post does not break any rules, keep post up".
This way you leave it to users to determine whether or not content being posted on the platform is acceptable.
But I'm not sure what's going on over at the inner workings of Twitter. I'm sure a fairly large chunk of their censorship is automated by machine learning algorithms with some human input on the side.
Split Twitter into 2 companies: Twitter and Karen. New Twitter would be an unmoderated backend. The only things that would be taken down would be blatantly illegal things like CP. Karen would be the current human moderator system.
Users wouldn't be forced to use Karen as their moderating service. They could subscribe to a different company as the moderator, or several companies as the moderators.
why just Jack? If you're gonna haul him off, you gotta haul off the engineers under him too.
As a software engineer myself, I welcome the Twitter engineers getting hauled off. Me and the rest of us MAGA devs will go and fix that site and make it fair to use for everybody.
Could the monitoring be open sourced? Like each person would subscribe to a blacklist (or multiple) that would censor tweets according to that lists curators?
You mean what they're currently doing right now? I mean I suppose it's possible. I'm not sure I get what you're going for with this question but I think it's likely they have human moderators squashing tweets and trends.
If you're talking more about making Twitter a fair platform. Your description touches on how Minds.com does their jury system for monitoring content.
Imagine if you posted some low-energy BS here on .win
If we had a jury system, after some people reported the post it would be shown to 10-20 currently active users and you would hit a button that says "Post should be removed" or "post does not break any rules, keep post up".
This way you leave it to users to determine whether or not content being posted on the platform is acceptable.
But I'm not sure what's going on over at the inner workings of Twitter. I'm sure a fairly large chunk of their censorship is automated by machine learning algorithms with some human input on the side.
I didnt do a good job of explaining my thoughts.
Split Twitter into 2 companies: Twitter and Karen. New Twitter would be an unmoderated backend. The only things that would be taken down would be blatantly illegal things like CP. Karen would be the current human moderator system.
Users wouldn't be forced to use Karen as their moderating service. They could subscribe to a different company as the moderator, or several companies as the moderators.