Is ACB going to back us up? I'm worried she's going to betray us lol, how come she didn't help us out with the PA case? Not trying to be a Debbie downer but I'm curious what you guys think.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Is ACB going to back us up? I'm worried she's going to betray us lol, how come she didn't help us out with the PA case? Not trying to be a Debbie downer but I'm curious what you guys think.
https://media.thedonald.win/post/DVSE7y3b.png
See new Tweets Tweet
John M. Reeves @reeveslawstl · 5h The below sentence from Justice Alito's order shows this is a very, very big deal. It is not a matter of just "preserving the status quo," as some legal commentators have argued. Quote Tweet
Hans Mahncke @HansMahncke · 6h "Until today, this Court was not informed that the guidance issued on October 28, which had an important bearing on the question whether to order special treatment of the ballots in question, had been modified."
SCOTUS usurped. Raises chances they'll throw all these ballots out. https://twitter.com/HansMahncke/status/1324885818213851138
If it comes to the court that Philly didn't segregate and didn't stop counting those ballots after 8pm, then that's a direct disobedience to a USSC decision.
At that point, if history is any indication, we're looking at a 9-0 ruling to throw out those ballots, not because it's good for Trump but in order to maintain the integrity of the highest court.
Yeah. This is a big fing deal.
I'm also super worried she'll try to recuse herself or not rule justly for the GEOTUS. She's so new I don't know what to expect. Hoping she isn't a RINO
Justices are supposed to be nonpartisan, so she's either an activist judge or a constitutionalist. Nothing we've seen so far would indicate she'd try legislating from the bench, or to allow the PA supreme court to legislate from the bench which they did. The only unknowns are things like intimidation, death threats, etc. that justices might receive from the Demonicrats. Hopefully the Supremes have really good security details.
She follows the constitution. As long as we have a clear case, she won't screw us
No
Please explain?
All you gotta do is Look at her children and how she got them. Yea I'm judging her
To my knowledge she adopted two children from Haiti and had five children with her husband, one of whom has Down's Syndrome. I'm not sure how we're supposed to judge her based on that, or what it has to do with how she'll rule on a clear-cut case of unconstitutional vote counting and/or fraud.
Just watch you'll see
LOL ok good point
I wish you'd offer an explanation. I sincerely hope you're wrong. If not... prep accordingly, I guess.
I hope I'm wrong too but I doubt it...
Y tho
She got a children with down's. The likeliness of that happening increases greatly with the woman's age. I know what it does to a woman, they feel guilty; she was probably destroyed. The only way forward with motherhood past that was adopting.
Seeing as Kavanaugh and ACB were two of the three lawyers arguing for Bush in Florida 2000, we’re good to go.
She is well known within the Catholic community, and if she does not do what is right for the country, then it means the soul of this country has truly fallen
Lol. We caught them cold. Dems are toast.
Lawyer here. If the question in PA comes down to whether ballots received after Nov. 3 are counted, I believed Alito, Kavanaugh, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Barrett will side with Trump.
I think based on Kavanaugh's reasoning in the pre-election Wisconsin opinion below, and Alito's decision in the pre-election PA opinion below, both decisions in which Gorsuch has joined, these three will back Trump. Thomas is a lock for the fourth vote, and I believe Barrett will follow based on her stated loyalty to Scalia's originalism, along with the fact that the other conservative justices, particularly her contemporary Kavanaugh and the staunch and wonderful Alito - have made strong statements in support of deference to the PA legislature.
Don't be fooled by biased dishonest media (but I repeat myself) opining about Alito's opinion in the Oct 29 PA opinion. These vipers want you to believe the Court upheld the merits of the state court extension of the ballot deadline- but it ain't so. Alito states clearly that the court did not have time to expedite hearing the matter. He explicitly stated, quote - "there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution." Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch agreed that the state court order should be stayed, but that would have required a fifth vote, but Roberts cucked, and Barrett recused. Once we have Barrett's vote, we have the majority.
Read Kavanaugh's opinion in the Wisconsin case. It is a brilliant explication of the importance of regularity and order in our national elections. He foresees the exact scenario we are living through now. Bottom line is deadlines in elections matter, state legislatures set election rules and cannot be overturned or modified by state courts. As for PA, the legislature made it abundantly clear in legislation that ballots received after 8pm on election day are not to be counted.
Read these opinions in full. They will give you hope.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a66_new_m6io.pdf (WI)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-542_i3dj.pdf (PA)
She has a lot to prove.
I am also worried
I'd imagine that GEOTUS foresaw this fraud, and that he appointed her with that in mind--she's a strict constructionist. Mark Levin made a solid legal argument today against the shenanigans in Philadelphia. As long as the President's lawyers can make that case persuasively I believe she'll rule in our favor.
I don't trust her.
But I trust Almighty God, and hopefully, the SC will not have to rule on this issue.