They used about 15 or 16 points on their new graph as opposed to the enormous number of data points on the first graph. It's the same highly suspect numbers, but they chose to make their graph significantly less detailed.
If you got tons of data, you want the most detailed ways of visually showing it to others. They do not. This reminds me of when you write a term paper over night and it's crap, but you put in a bunch of big words and toss in some quality facts to make it look like you spent a month perfecting it. I believe it's called "Bullshitting".
The graph in this post has data up to 11:11 of the next day. The 538 post was from 6:59 a.m. Is data for vote total updates available to the public by state? It must be for someone to have created this comparison gif.
Has anyone on the left provided an explanation for this? This seems incredibly damning. This didn't just happen in one state, it happened in GA, WI, and MI all in the middle of the night between 2 AM - 5 AM. Seriously, wtf?
Clara Hendrickson fact-checks Michigan issues and politics as a corps member with Report for America, an initiative of The GroundTruth Project. Contact her at [email protected] or 313-296-5743 for comments or to suggest a fact-check.
I call it a "Snopes Shuffle" based on the name Kansas City Shuffle scam.
It involves getting overly technical about the claim, or overly vague. Altering or replacing information to obfuscate in it, such as the Obama Presidential Painting, where they claim that isn't a big sperm on his forehead. (They use a very small, cropped picture of the painting and then compare it to the real life picture. They cropped out the head of the sperm. )
They do the same thing with "Are Nazi's socialists" (They claim its not real socialisim so no.) Or the "Democrats have tried to impeach every republican who's become president (Snopes claims this as false, because the democrats didn't try to impeach the republicans who didn't become president, and the ones that were attempted either the impeachment attempt wasn't really taken seriously or it was "bipartizan" )
GOOD FIND PEDE...what the literal fuck...all they did was increase the sampling time interval...THAT IS LITERALLY ALL THEY DID...congratulations on them figuring out how to make something less precise...I can do that too: Instead of 16 intervals of time-averaged accumulation including the origin, why not use 2...then it is a nice pretty line, straight from 0 voted counted to Joe Biden wins you bigot!
The fact that there is no difference in vote share percentage after the lead switches is telling. It is literally a massive, impossible increase and then just T + 0.6%.
It would be more believable if Biden had a much larger increase. It makes no sense that the early ballots would have massive gains for Biden and then just as suddenly as it was switched on it was switched off.
They are adding votes for Trump as well or they would show Biden soaring over flatlined Trump.
To manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.
Psychologists use the term “gaslighting” to refer to a specific type of manipulation where the manipulator is trying to get someone else (or a group of people) to question their own reality, memory or perceptions.
When explaining it to normies have them look at the rest of the graph. There are other times when Bidens votes jump straight up, but Trumps do at the same time implying they just dumped a ton of votes for both (although could still be tampered with). The dump near the end only Biden gets votes. That's impossible.
Also good to explain the sheer volume of that many votes.
150k would basically be medium uhaul worth of ballots. This is the collection of a couple towns of ballots; 1-3 small cities.. or a couple city blocks.
If you just grabbed 150k people form any of those things, do you think that you would ever get 100% of them being pro or against anything? Like literally anything. Even something utterly detestable will show some outliers, if anything for the lulz...
spread this far and wide.
this is a fake news debunk and shows the fraud as well. 2 birds with one stone!
Beautiful.
They used about 15 or 16 points on their new graph as opposed to the enormous number of data points on the first graph. It's the same highly suspect numbers, but they chose to make their graph significantly less detailed.
If you got tons of data, you want the most detailed ways of visually showing it to others. They do not. This reminds me of when you write a term paper over night and it's crap, but you put in a bunch of big words and toss in some quality facts to make it look like you spent a month perfecting it. I believe it's called "Bullshitting".
The magnitude of our victory has exposed the democrats cheating! Very stable genius confirmed!!
Im not seeing this gif spammed enough in their twitter feed.
How 1984 of them.
Everyone who gave up when the t.v. and big brother said that it was over don't know how big this fight is becoming.
Did you hear the latest news from the front?
CLEARLY A ANOMALY THERE, NO DOUBT!
Where is the "real data" sourced from? I have a friend who sent me the USA today article showing the other graph to try and prove me wrong.
538/Nate Silver
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpPL6oTZ/michigan-original-graph-showing-/c/
The graph in this post has data up to 11:11 of the next day. The 538 post was from 6:59 a.m. Is data for vote total updates available to the public by state? It must be for someone to have created this comparison gif.
They're claiming racism? Oh no; That has never been used as an attack vector before!
How ever will we dodge this 😨
Glitch in our systems! Fuck the media
Has anyone on the left provided an explanation for this? This seems incredibly damning. This didn't just happen in one state, it happened in GA, WI, and MI all in the middle of the night between 2 AM - 5 AM. Seriously, wtf?
I e, the same graphed numbers, but now only shown with hourly updates which smoothes out the transition. That's how you get a 'correct graph'.
Yep this is a smoothed curve done by signal averaging to hide the dump
sauce
https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/04/michigan-election-ballots-mail-absentee-hour-count-update/6161367002/
Clara Hendrickson fact-checks Michigan issues and politics as a corps member with Report for America, an initiative of The GroundTruth Project. Contact her at [email protected] or 313-296-5743 for comments or to suggest a fact-check.
Who at dfp should be fired?
Bravo on this.
By improperly framing the question, they discredit the truth.
Maybe we should call this a “snopism”?
I call it a "Snopes Shuffle" based on the name Kansas City Shuffle scam.
It involves getting overly technical about the claim, or overly vague. Altering or replacing information to obfuscate in it, such as the Obama Presidential Painting, where they claim that isn't a big sperm on his forehead. (They use a very small, cropped picture of the painting and then compare it to the real life picture. They cropped out the head of the sperm. )
They do the same thing with "Are Nazi's socialists" (They claim its not real socialisim so no.) Or the "Democrats have tried to impeach every republican who's become president (Snopes claims this as false, because the democrats didn't try to impeach the republicans who didn't become president, and the ones that were attempted either the impeachment attempt wasn't really taken seriously or it was "bipartizan" )
Okay this seems to be gaining credence if they want to just gloss over and hide it like this.
Really convenient. Now they can claim “clerical error.” still, enough for an audit!
Look at what I posted yesterday lol https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKb2Niq/common-core-graph-in-an-attempt-/c/
Basically the original data has way more data points and thus is more detailed and accurate, so they just removed most of those data points.
The Lügenpresse is going for a gold medal.
It's like they turned 4k resolution down to 144p.
"Here are the facts! Drawn with 12 dots of crayon so you know it's the real deal"
Why is Michigan the only graph out there? I want to see all the states so we can compare.
Lol, reminds me of that scene in "The Campaign".
"What if we took it on it's axis, and flipped it this way?"
UNDERSAMPLING.
Show more points - Back to elementary school Detroit "Free" Press
The media loves manipulation...
The decreased the resolution to smooth the curve.
Yes, they kept the fucking votes and tell us were crazy.
See you at the Capitol building today.
saved
GOOD FIND PEDE...what the literal fuck...all they did was increase the sampling time interval...THAT IS LITERALLY ALL THEY DID...congratulations on them figuring out how to make something less precise...I can do that too: Instead of 16 intervals of time-averaged accumulation including the origin, why not use 2...then it is a nice pretty line, straight from 0 voted counted to Joe Biden wins you bigot!
The old smoothing trick.
The fact that there is no difference in vote share percentage after the lead switches is telling. It is literally a massive, impossible increase and then just T + 0.6%.
It would be more believable if Biden had a much larger increase. It makes no sense that the early ballots would have massive gains for Biden and then just as suddenly as it was switched on it was switched off.
They are adding votes for Trump as well or they would show Biden soaring over flatlined Trump.
Has anyone traced the spike back to a precinct? We’re these a batch of mail-ins?
Gaslight, verb
To manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.
Psychologists use the term “gaslighting” to refer to a specific type of manipulation where the manipulator is trying to get someone else (or a group of people) to question their own reality, memory or perceptions.
Of course they're hiding this, they don't want people to know, BUT WE ALREADY KNOW
MAGA
When explaining it to normies have them look at the rest of the graph. There are other times when Bidens votes jump straight up, but Trumps do at the same time implying they just dumped a ton of votes for both (although could still be tampered with). The dump near the end only Biden gets votes. That's impossible.
Also good to explain the sheer volume of that many votes.
150k would basically be medium uhaul worth of ballots. This is the collection of a couple towns of ballots; 1-3 small cities.. or a couple city blocks.
If you just grabbed 150k people form any of those things, do you think that you would ever get 100% of them being pro or against anything? Like literally anything. Even something utterly detestable will show some outliers, if anything for the lulz...
Holy shit. Stay on this. One of the msm debunkings says these were taken back out. They obviously weren’t.