1183
Comments (42)
sorted by:
47
MAGA_VANGUARD 47 points ago +47 / -0

This needs a sticky

11
MAGAdadUSA 11 points ago +11 / -0

I second.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
SirWilliam 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was noticing this all night on election night. Vote totals going down in live updates.

32
Trumpfan1 32 points ago +32 / -0

All I can say to this is WOW! Corruption right before our eyes 👀...& on the Corrupt News Network!

12
deleted 12 points ago +15 / -3
6
2l84aa 6 points ago +7 / -1

Just want to play devil's advocate here.

They have 3K employees. If you put those people in the image next to all the prominent figures from cnn probably you would see the same number of blacks, same number of LGBT, the same number of [fill in with whatever group]. You are using their fake news tactics to push forward a narrative.

And I'm not even attacking the point the image is trying to make (I get the point).

Just sayin...

6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
5
Jester 5 points ago +5 / -0

Saved. Thank you for posting this

3
MasterOfIllusions 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now do the one with US congresspeople who have dual citizenship!

1
2l84aa 1 point ago +2 / -1

Those are a lot of sister companies who share content. That's corporatism in the publishing business. That's one thing.

What those images are doing is they are looking at the top 20/30 jews in a given corporation. Like a "jew almanaq of prominent figures"

Very different than saying there's only jews in prominent positions. It's just that you're only showing those people.

4
Cutter 4 points ago +4 / -0

naw... it wasn't corruption, just 560 voters changing their minds. All at once.

23
2l84aa 23 points ago +23 / -0

He claims that it's a direct feed from the voting computer. Is this 100% confirmed? Are we 100% sure that CNN doesn't have some intern typing it up into the pretty graphics and a mistake was made? Just want to be 100% sure.

We need good evidence 100% of the times and we don't want to be validating anything we are not 100% sure as it can be used to attack our efforts.

Proceed with caution that's all i'm saying.

12
Elladar [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

I agree, now that this has been exposed, it should be fully verified. (Obviously asking CNN is pointless because they will lie).

4
Pepe2016_ivotedfTD 4 points ago +4 / -0

CNN has no idea this is happening, they have nothing to do with it. The vote switch is happening someplace else. I just can’t believe the hackers were brazen enough to use the exact 560 votes for each candidate.

6
Plazma10 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've written the software before for these networks. The timing is way too overwhelming for CNN to master because all the data for all the large broadcast and cable networks comes from the same AP feed.

The TV crew couldn't handle this type of strategizing, it's gotta be done from there source AP feeds.

5
CalVotesMatter 5 points ago +5 / -0

He mentions "here comes an update from clarity"

Clarityelections.com redirects to scytl.us

You can duck results from clarity elections. I do not know how they get their data, but that would be the data shown in the gold box.

3
Veylis 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s my question as well. I never assumed CNN has a direct link into the tabulations software. Do they?

4
Elladar [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

They shouldn't, they just were reporting as it happened. I would presume, the gold box info was available to anyone. The one at the bottom was the CNN one.

2
wernerziegler 2 points ago +3 / -1

I doubt that there's a direct link.

10
montag 10 points ago +10 / -0

That snippet is from a longer video showing how insecure electronic voting systems are. Watch the full video, especially if you understand software infrastructure.

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpPMEfMk/get-in-here-expert-on-electronic/c/

8
2
Elladar [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks!

4
Txiribiton 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wow, anorher one, two days ago someone posted some screenshots and Trump had less votes at 8pm than at 7pm.

4
RPOZ28 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good work.

4
Bravo1 4 points ago +4 / -0

I am boiling! This is armed robbery

4
KnoxVegasGirl 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mods please sticky this.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
2
Elladar [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks!

4
snappus 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is insane!

3
kekkk 3 points ago +3 / -0

ELECTRONIC VOTE FRAUD

2
Maenard 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll check if no one has, but what did CNN's bottom tracker change to at the next update?

2
Elladar [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably to the same thing that the golden box showed. The steal happened at the golden box, not at CNN tracker. Tracker itself is 1 second behind the golden box. The cheating is happening in the golden box, not in the CNN tracker.

2
Maenard 2 points ago +2 / -0

The question is whether the next update on the CNN tracker also removed votes to match the box. Were the lost votes in the box reflected in CNN's tracker?

It would have to be on there if CNN's tracker and the box are linked an 1 second apart. 1 second after the box showed votes lost, the CNN tracker did not change to match the recent box counts, did it?

2
Ivleeeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

This isn't really evidence of fraud. It presents a suspicion. It's easily explained by a misattribution being corrected. Now it could be fraud. But you need evidence that this happened AND that hammer was being used.

2
hillaryforprison 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree that subtracting 1000+ votes from a republican seems odd.

But I don't believe that 'one area' of the screen is a 'feed' and the bottom ribbon is not. I think the entire page is CNN data and they can make the numbers and text say whatever they want.

2
KnoxVegasGirl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has the Republican in that race seen this?

2
FluffiPuff 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is huge - saving for posterity

2
JesusWept 2 points ago +2 / -0

STICKY THIS. Worth viewing.

1
Donkey_Schmonkey 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m not sure this would be hammer/scorecard. This seems more like some original CNN fuckery, a proprietary blend.

2
Pepe2016_ivotedfTD 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, watch the whole video. CNN has nothing to do with it.