1123
Comments (26)
sorted by:
27
nuhbin 27 points ago +27 / -0

what if the supreme court says the remedies for PA are a re-do or the count stands, but no audit and no recount?

I totally get your point, bit never say never

nobody knows what this looks like in the end

18
Au_contrarian 18 points ago +18 / -0

Theoretically if you don't segregate illegal ballots, there is no remedy but a new election.

3
league_of_fail 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem is, for much of the fraud that has been uncovered, there wouldn't be a way to separate all of the illegal ballots. Sure, you could catch the dead voter block the Dems captured, but the hundreds of thousands of late-counted ballots, especially those backdated by the USPS? Those have already spoiled the ballot population.

24
Conservativechick 24 points ago +24 / -0

I disagree - legally, a revote has precedent as a remedy for fraud - it is much more likely that the Supreme Court would consent to a revote than to flatly hand the election to Trump - although that would be great!

We have NOTHING to fear from a revote. Trump won, we know that. If there is a re-vote - with mandatory military observation and NO mail in ballots, then Trump will win by a huge margin, and it will be clear that fraud was committed.

They have done this in such a way that it is now literally impossible to know which ballots are valid and which are not. It is obvious to any thinking, rational person, that this is unacceptable.

Ive been saying either we accept the results of election night, 12:00am, or we re-do the election. By offering that as an option, you gain credibility, and place responsibility squarely on the shoulders of the guilty party.

10
Anti_Immigration 10 points ago +10 / -0

'Please give us a mulligan on fraud" you have to be retarded to want to do that. Because basically now they know the exact numbers they need

9
M3CJC 9 points ago +9 / -0

I mean I kinda want to cast my 3rd vote for Donald J Trump

8
45squared 8 points ago +8 / -0

I get the sentiment, but for states that had fraudulent votes mixed in (e.g. poll workers filled in the dates) there will be no way to separate those from legal ballots, so either the entire county is thrown out or a re-do has to happen.

5
GunTottinPatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have no problem with a "re-do" if its in person/ID only, well supervised and without those scam machines, national guard should be in charge of the election not political hacks

4
mercynurse 4 points ago +4 / -0

The date is set in US Constitution, along with dates for electors

Cannot have re vote

The system is designed to function and self correct

Trump won

4
45squared 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, if states don’t get their votes certified by deadlines, don’t they forfeit their electors? I don’t remember how that works in terms of 270 EC votes threshold. Would Trump be more impacted than Biden if key swing state EC votes are withheld due to not meeting a deadline? Dan Bongino spelled this all out in a podcast, but I don’t remember and wishful thinking that I wouldn’t have to. 😕

3
Dieselslacker 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have been saying, have every vote come get their ballot. Any left behind are bogus

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
4
SirPokeSmottington 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hope that's not everyone's opinion.

Republic or not, I am interested in the true vote.

But that's in-person voting, ink on finger, 1 day only, and only if you can prove you are supposed to be voting where you are voting.

EO a national paid holiday. No excuses.

1
VeritasSuperOmnia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that all you can do? Repeat yourself? Low IQ shill.

2
Jakefoy92 2 points ago +3 / -1

This. It’s ridiculous to ask law abiding, legal voters to redo what they did legitimately

1
Average-Joe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly

1
VeritasSuperOmnia 1 point ago +1 / -0

A redo is necessary. The fraudulent ballots were mixed with the good ones and Trump ballots were trashed. The only way to come back from that is a redo, not a recount.

1
Here_we_go 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need in person voting on paper ballots with ID and only mail ins will be from the elderly or infirmed with doctors note that is kept separate. And each vote to be checked by hand by 2 poll workers- 1 from each party Otherwise the mass fraud mail ins, long count times and electronic software fraud will reign again

1
CheekyBastard 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution is clear that state legislatures select the method for choosing electors. If the election in a state is fucked, it goes back to the legislature for a vote. See Florida 2000 for further info.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's no constitutional way to redo a nation wide election.

1
Icantalktoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is there is local elections too bud. It’s a cluster fuck.

1
TownHallBall 1 point ago +1 / -0

I appreciate your post pede. The gaslighting had gotten me down.

I'm back now. 4 more years

1
Emhunt_77 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely

1
love_and_peace 1 point ago +1 / -0

A re-vote would reveal the actual makeup of America and probably reveal a Trump landslide. If Trump wins through the courts, it will be 4 more years of "illegitimatcy" from the media.

1
MetalRiddle 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not asinine. That would be the best remedy to a fraudulent election. I know Trump won, but the best way to prove it would be with a properly monitored election.

0
Pepe2016_ivotedfTD 0 points ago +1 / -1

A re-do will never happen and shouldn’t happen. Stop talking about it.