I disagree - legally, a revote has precedent as a remedy for fraud - it is much more likely that the Supreme Court would consent to a revote than to flatly hand the election to Trump - although that would be great!
We have NOTHING to fear from a revote. Trump won, we know that. If there is a re-vote - with mandatory military observation and NO mail in ballots, then Trump will win by a huge margin, and it will be clear that fraud was committed.
They have done this in such a way that it is now literally impossible to know which ballots are valid and which are not. It is obvious to any thinking, rational person, that this is unacceptable.
Ive been saying either we accept the results of election night, 12:00am, or we re-do the election. By offering that as an option, you gain credibility, and place responsibility squarely on the shoulders of the guilty party.
I disagree - legally, a revote has precedent as a remedy for fraud - it is much more likely that the Supreme Court would consent to a revote than to flatly hand the election to Trump - although that would be great!
We have NOTHING to fear from a revote. Trump won, we know that. If there is a re-vote - with mandatory military observation and NO mail in ballots, then Trump will win by a huge margin, and it will be clear that fraud was committed.
They have done this in such a way that it is now literally impossible to know which ballots are valid and which are not. It is obvious to any thinking, rational person, that this is unacceptable.
Ive been saying either we accept the results of election night, 12:00am, or we re-do the election. By offering that as an option, you gain credibility, and place responsibility squarely on the shoulders of the guilty party.