You don't have to convince them now while the court cases are still not started.
I know it is hard to be mocked, dude, but you just have to organize your arguments and the receipts of election fraud much better, and avoid sounding like Alex Jones.
For example:
Keep away from the bits that are still not verified as of now e.g. QFS blockchain watermark etc.
Show them verified and proven instances of poll observers not allowed to observe the vote count. Surely, you can make them concede that is wrong.
If not, they are lost or you have bad argument skills.
Show them the verified Dominion voting glitch. Throw the question at them that if this same software is installed in multiple states, surely it is fair enough to scrutinize the results.
Once they have conceded that election fraud does exists, then you can start pointing out some questsions.
e.g.
Do they believe Joe Biden is more popular than Obama?
Do they believe it is possible for 138,000 votes to go 100% for Biden?
Even the conservative counties don't go 100% for Trump.
Why did other bigger states had no problem with counting votes?
Why did the voting count stopped for the "battleground" states?
Why is it every time Joe manages to take the lead over Trump it happened when people are sleeping?
Why is the number of mail-in ballots found keep on increasing?
etc..
Go watch some Charlie Kirk streams and pick up some of the arguments he is using, maybe that could also be helpful.
Oh man, I'm actually quite good at arguing. They just refuse to accept everything I say now.
I've actually already asked them multiple questions
The answers are usually:
No, but the hate for Trump is bigger.
Yes.
Florida had more people counting...
Oh shut up.
Oh shut up.
USPS.
Then we ditch the politics and start drinking beer.
Do you mean to tell us you are cuckolded and bullied? Your psyop is failing.
We won, dipshit, and now we have to fight.
Hahaha, relax dude. I'm fine, just wanted to tell a story.
Now screencap it and go put it on Reddit saying "Adding This To My Trumpster Salt Collection 🤣".
If you do not understand why we have no use for this bullshit, my hope is that I am helping you understand right now.
Bro, sending it to them right now.
I fully expect this. Confidence is key.... and sometimes less dialog is better than more.
Oh man, I totally wrecked them in 2016. They have the right to tease me.
You don't have to convince them now while the court cases are still not started.
I know it is hard to be mocked, dude, but you just have to organize your arguments and the receipts of election fraud much better, and avoid sounding like Alex Jones.
For example:
Keep away from the bits that are still not verified as of now e.g. QFS blockchain watermark etc.
Show them verified and proven instances of poll observers not allowed to observe the vote count. Surely, you can make them concede that is wrong. If not, they are lost or you have bad argument skills.
Show them the verified Dominion voting glitch. Throw the question at them that if this same software is installed in multiple states, surely it is fair enough to scrutinize the results.
Once they have conceded that election fraud does exists, then you can start pointing out some questsions.
e.g.
Do they believe Joe Biden is more popular than Obama?
Do they believe it is possible for 138,000 votes to go 100% for Biden? Even the conservative counties don't go 100% for Trump.
Why did other bigger states had no problem with counting votes?
Why did the voting count stopped for the "battleground" states?
Why is it every time Joe manages to take the lead over Trump it happened when people are sleeping?
Why is the number of mail-in ballots found keep on increasing? etc..
Go watch some Charlie Kirk streams and pick up some of the arguments he is using, maybe that could also be helpful.
Oh man, I'm actually quite good at arguing. They just refuse to accept everything I say now. I've actually already asked them multiple questions The answers are usually:
Then nothing you can do but wait until this is all sorted.