no, because there is a mountain of evidence of fraud and we don't need any ridiculous narrative out there that the evidence we have is related to watermarks.
The world hangs on a balance. It's just stupid to not investigate everything, no matter how ridiculous it sounds. If there's nothing to it, they're adults. They can handle rejection.
i agree there is nothing wrong with checkng it out.
But keep in mind, if it turns out to be a conspiracy, then Trump supporters would look like the "the boy who cried wolf", and would be do more damage than good.
I say, until more concrete developments come from it, focus on the proven election fraud e.g. voting glitches, poll observers not allowed to observe, dead voters, illegitimate voters. etc.
that's why people don't want to focus on it. there's NO proof of it at all. meanwhile, there are things that there ARE proof of, so the focus should be there.
Not necessarily that "more information is never a bad thing"
When Trump Campaign sets up hotline for reporting fraud, lefties are flooding it as well. This is distraction and consumes effort/ energy.
On watermark, there definitely is a watermark, but as confirmed by CISA, it is done at the local level. This means if the local election officials are corrupt, then they know exactly what this is, and would use methods that circumvent this.
For example, they would flood the area with excess valid ballots.
They have methods to harvest / buy those ballots.
So those ballots used would most likely be real ballots and the watermark won't help with that at all.
just don't want people acting like anything hinges on the existence of a watermark because it absolutely does not.
um no.... people can look all the want, but it's a waste of time.
if it's real, it's real and will be used. If it's not, it's not.
Why? Because you don't want to hurt their feelings if it turns out to be wrong? That's just silly.
no, because there is a mountain of evidence of fraud and we don't need any ridiculous narrative out there that the evidence we have is related to watermarks.
The world hangs on a balance. It's just stupid to not investigate everything, no matter how ridiculous it sounds. If there's nothing to it, they're adults. They can handle rejection.
It's called strategy. Do whatever you want, but don't expect other people to put any effort into something there's no evidence for.
i agree there is nothing wrong with checkng it out.
But keep in mind, if it turns out to be a conspiracy, then Trump supporters would look like the "the boy who cried wolf", and would be do more damage than good.
I say, until more concrete developments come from it, focus on the proven election fraud e.g. voting glitches, poll observers not allowed to observe, dead voters, illegitimate voters. etc.
that's why people don't want to focus on it. there's NO proof of it at all. meanwhile, there are things that there ARE proof of, so the focus should be there.
Not necessarily that "more information is never a bad thing" When Trump Campaign sets up hotline for reporting fraud, lefties are flooding it as well. This is distraction and consumes effort/ energy.
On watermark, there definitely is a watermark, but as confirmed by CISA, it is done at the local level. This means if the local election officials are corrupt, then they know exactly what this is, and would use methods that circumvent this.
https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol
For example, they would flood the area with excess valid ballots. They have methods to harvest / buy those ballots. So those ballots used would most likely be real ballots and the watermark won't help with that at all.