Guiliani should have come out like this was 9/11, because it is, TIMES 1000. This was soft, weak, and it HONESTLY seems like all we have is that they didn’t let us watch. He’s using words like “maybe” and “possibly”? If we’re not hearing at this point that they HAVE IRREFUTABLE evidence the Supreme Court will LAUGH at this case, total laugh. They’re not going to reverse an election for maybe’s. You talked about fraud for 6 months, now we’re surprised when it happened? GET SOMEONE IN FRONT OF A MIC THATS READY FOR WAR AND RALLIES THE TROOPS
Guiliani should have come out like this was 9/11, because it is, TIMES 1000. This was soft, weak, and it HONESTLY seems like all we have is that they didn’t let us watch. He’s using words like “maybe” and “possibly”? If we’re not hearing at this point that they HAVE IRREFUTABLE evidence the Supreme Court will LAUGH at this case, total laugh. They’re not going to reverse an election for maybe’s. You talked about fraud for 6 months, now we’re surprised when it happened? GET SOMEONE IN FRONT OF A MIC THATS READY FOR WAR AND RALLIES THE TROOPS