1858
Comments (35)
sorted by:
32
Whoopies_tds 32 points ago +32 / -0

Ding ding ding 👆

26
Mokkan 26 points ago +26 / -0

It’s to see who registered to vote and didn’t end up voting at all.

They then have a name, signature and it looks half legitimate

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
23
tiredofwinning2020 23 points ago +23 / -0

This.... I see no decent way of proving this kind of fraud...

I think the only way around this is to throw out any ballets counted after a certain time of the Election Day. Meaning we would go back in time to when Trump was clearly winning.

17
goodbeerbetterviews2 17 points ago +17 / -0

If we didn’t get to observe the ballot counting taking place....that is fraud. That is provable.

8
Jedibelle01 8 points ago +8 / -0

Michigan and PA both have very clear laws on this and any ballots brought in after the fact, are not to be counted OR are to be segregated and counted.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
iamherefortheluls 4 points ago +4 / -0

going to have to account on the fact that some people might lie. But I am sure most will be pissed to know their votes got faked.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
OldeHickoryHouse 2 points ago +2 / -0

What would an audit of anonymous ballots do for us?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
OldeHickoryHouse 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, but the ballots are anonymous so you don't know who cast the vote.

2
oh_hi_solidarity 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can check the voter registry to see if you voted or not no? So go through the registry and contact every individual, see if they voted or not

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
ztrich007 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, that method should probably work pretty easily

1
ztrich007 1 point ago +1 / -0

This should actually be pretty easy to prove, by showing a divergence between people claiming to have voted and who they voted for (which can be asked from them in a secret way through proper investigative procedures so as to maintain anonymity of the ballot) versus how they are on record as having voted. If the divergence is significant as it probably would be this would be enough to invalidate this batch of ballots.

11
coup13 11 points ago +11 / -0

It takes too much time. I bet they prepped way ahead of time and ran short.

Check people who died and those thag moved out of state recently and you'll find a ton of votes there.

11
DeplorableSpanishGuy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yep.

Now the problem is how do we figure out which votes are fraudulent and which are not.

4
kebabdrogo 4 points ago +5 / -1

Mixed in fraudulent ballots will get them all thrown out. Either redo or state legislature/electors decide outcome.

11
TearofLys 11 points ago +11 / -0

interesting and very plausible theory. Would explain why these places take so long to tally their vote compared to other places.

6
LowbloodHighEnergyRI 6 points ago +6 / -0

And why certain key states "paused" counting around 1 AM. Makes no sense...

10
PMSocks 10 points ago +10 / -0

You watch ... those thousands of ballots will not be in a randomized order.

Should be able to track as they get scanned into the system

2
rarepepe2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine they did a pull on ballots and sorted it on some field like name filled, filled them out and then counted them.

Quick check on any patterns could show fuckery. Best case is if they did it by address , then its no doubt

8
TRUMP420KUSH 8 points ago +8 / -0

I got an insane amount of text messages and calls from democrat organizations asking if I had returned my absentee ballot yet.

When I was in line voting, the two women, mother and daughter in front of me were 60ish and 94. When they swiped the 94 y/o's ID it said she had already submitted an absentee ballot and made her step aside to talk to someone else after her daughter started going off on them because she has never voted absentee before and didn't request it this time.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
makethemwatch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Im sure they were harvesting ballots up until the 5th if not later

4
Pepe_longcockings 4 points ago +4 / -0

This would reinforce the claim by the poll watcher during Giuliani’s press conf earlier - The guy who said he was kept from seeing much, but reported when he DID see something, he frequently noticed there’d be a box of ballots that had the same handwriting on every ballot

2
Kpstyles 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gotta know just how many to cheat by

2
fskfsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

They also had to wait to see the honest vote count, so they knew how much fraud they needed.

1
ztrich007 1 point ago +1 / -0

This man knows.

1
Deplorable2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

So what's going to happen if some mail in ballots show up from the people the cheating Dems voted for? God I hope this bites them in the ass

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dallasguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

They also sent all the election monitors home.

1
genghiskern 1 point ago +1 / -0

Classy.

1
chopz 1 point ago +1 / -0

and people didn't even do this, at least not entirely. An algorithm did it. People doing this process would take months to do and they did it over a short time