1825
Michigan will go red: Benford's law proves unilateral fraud in Detroit beyond a reasonable doubt (media.patriots.win) 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by mjwfour ago by mjwfour +1825 / -0
50 comments
50 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (50)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 38 ▼
– sleepwhenimdead 38 points ago +38 / -0

I totally agree but is there any way we can prove it and cancel fraudulent votes? Will statistics alone allow for an audit?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– mixednuts86 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't think so. I'm not a lawyer, but I feel like this would have to be apart of a broader case. The case would have to be focused around specifically when those votes were added, where they came from and who they went to. They'd need more detail around the ballots, and I think data like this is supplemental evidence. While mathematically improbable, impossible, I think there needs to be more to support a case like this.

I'd be interested to hear how the IRS has used the rule to litigate in the past as well as the election that was challenged using this method. This rule/methodology seems like it's the starting point of investigation. You're looking for patterns. Well, the patter in there, now what?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– wWBRoik6sceKP2 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is incredibly damning, but it feels like grounds for a warrant, not the smoking gun. It's basically the metal detector beeping saying you've found something, now go dig it up.

permalink parent save report block reply