If any pedes could PLEASE give me a source for the precinct data, I would greatly appreciate it. I have been running Benford's law against Biden's votes for hundreds of counties but I can't find precinct data.
This is what I used, and got different results from what most got. TBH I'm not sure if this data is only for the city or for the entire county, but it does have precinct-level data. I did do Benford's on Milwaukee and got exactly what others got, so I'm with you, I have no idea where this data is coming from.
Also, as a side note, I'm no statistician, but doing Benford's law for a large sample size of counties might just make suspicious results cancel out other suspicious results. The cheating is localized in a few dem counties and throwing in that data with other non-cheating data will probably eliminate the statistical anomalies.
The key takeaway from the graphic is that only Biden's votes violate Benford's law, as Trump's votes follow Benford's law to a tee. Benford's law will be used to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was voter fraud in certain areas (Milwaukee, Detriot, Philadelphia, and Allegheny). Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania will be red and Trump will get the corresponding 46 electoral votes.
I don't think that Benford's law should be taken as or interpreted as PROOF that fraud occurred, but it should be used as a solid indicator that it may have, enough to prompt a thorough investigation that will root out any proof.
If any pedes could PLEASE give me a source for the precinct data, I would greatly appreciate it. I have been running Benford's law against Biden's votes for hundreds of counties but I can't find precinct data.
https://www.philadelphiavotes.com/en/resources-a-data/archived-data-sets
This is what I used, and got different results from what most got. TBH I'm not sure if this data is only for the city or for the entire county, but it does have precinct-level data. I did do Benford's on Milwaukee and got exactly what others got, so I'm with you, I have no idea where this data is coming from.
Also, as a side note, I'm no statistician, but doing Benford's law for a large sample size of counties might just make suspicious results cancel out other suspicious results. The cheating is localized in a few dem counties and throwing in that data with other non-cheating data will probably eliminate the statistical anomalies.
You guys are the best. Thank you.
Exactly what I'm looking for as well.
The key takeaway from the graphic is that only Biden's votes violate Benford's law, as Trump's votes follow Benford's law to a tee. Benford's law will be used to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was voter fraud in certain areas (Milwaukee, Detriot, Philadelphia, and Allegheny). Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania will be red and Trump will get the corresponding 46 electoral votes.
I don't think that Benford's law should be taken as or interpreted as PROOF that fraud occurred, but it should be used as a solid indicator that it may have, enough to prompt a thorough investigation that will root out any proof.
great work but we have hardly scratched the surface. the red wave is real.
Saving this