3274
Comments (52)
sorted by:
98
deleted 98 points ago +98 / -0
62
2020REBOUND [S] 62 points ago +62 / -0

I mean.. a widespread challenge of Voter Fraud after an election?

I dream of that since I took the first red pill on voting! Wouldn't have happened if he won by some votes. This way they will never be able to defraud us again.(they will try ofc.)

43
Cakes4077 43 points ago +43 / -0

I would love this. It's widely known that fraud and election problems happen all over Democrat strongholds, but nothing gets done about it.

26
2020REBOUND [S] 26 points ago +26 / -0

Did you every experience anything like what is happening right now?

Monday more lawsuits.

19
Cakes4077 19 points ago +19 / -0

Never on this level, and IT IS GLORIOUS! If these lawsuits don't succeed, then we don't deserve this country or democracy.

12
Winged_Splinter 12 points ago +13 / -1

I don't want it to come to this, but even if the lawsuits don't succeed, all Trump has to do is carry on lawsuits until Dec 14th and the the house GOP will decide who wins the election.

7
uzi5v2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is this true? I’m not sure I follow.

16
Winged_Splinter 16 points ago +16 / -0

Yes. If the court choose to reject the Presidents request for a recount and his lawsuits continue until Dec 14th it will then go to the house to decide. While the GOP holds an overall minority in the House, we do hold a majority of state votes which is how the presidential election would be decided. If it comes down to that there will be 50 votes and we own the majority of those votes.

I don't believe the GOP would be brave enough to vote against Trump in that scenario.

3
Necrophagist-2018 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did this happen in 2000? Because I’m fairly certain it didn’t.

4
Weslowski456 4 points ago +4 / -0

No it didnt come to that If I remember correctly the supreme court said no more recounts after three. Al Gore then conceded on Dec 13

1
Winged_Splinter 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. It didn't get to that point. There was a recount and it ended there.

10
Bubbahax 10 points ago +10 / -0

If the supreme court won't upload the law, then there is no law.

3
Winged_Splinter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Honestly, the only way we lose in the SC is if cuck Roberts and one of Trumps new picks vote with him. I don't see that happening, but I also didn't think the left would commit fraud to this extent.

2
Bubbahax 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thomas with a chance to exact retribution on Biden. Kavanaugh with a chance to exact retribution on Harris. Alito pissed off that his legal orders have been ignored. Corrupt political operatives flipping the bird to the court. I can't even imagine the court would rule in Biden's favor on any of this. I guess we'll see if the Obama appointees have any integrity at all, because it ought to be 9-0 in favor of honest elections.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
Leenaraven 6 points ago +6 / -0

and this how the deep state wins and he is about to go over them big time over the next 4 years

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
38
2020REBOUND [S] 38 points ago +38 / -0

OK NOT NEW! THIS STATMEENT NEEDS TO BE PINNED TO THE TOP OF TD! THIS IS AMAZING! Where is it?

SOURCE:https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/statement-from-president-donald-j.-trump/

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
6
Bacontastegood 6 points ago +6 / -0

This! Trump's words need to be at the top every day all day untill it's over!

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
13
uzi5v2 13 points ago +13 / -0

Or he’ll be remembered as the man who single handily won election twice against a very powerful and corrupt system hell bent on seeing him fail. He had THAT much support they couldn’t even cheat enough to win! Just like everything else they do, this strategy will probably end up aging VERY poorly in the history books!

6
CaptJohnYossarian 6 points ago +6 / -0

No. The result will be the unmasking of the globalist plot.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
2020REBOUND [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah but more like another elicited TDS symptom cause them being exposed as cheaters will destroy their chances for years to come in various ways.

But the worst form them would've been a Trump landslide smooth like Florida was rolling out. A mandate that would`ve allowed Trump to go full MAGA. ..

2
thebigbear 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe we are overthinking this. Could this be a "cunning plan me lord" to force the republican controlled State legislators to institute Voter ID, no Mail in ballots unless Absentee or Military, election cutoff times for reporting, mandatory "AIR GAPPING" of voting operations, Mandatory Dem & Rep reps doing poll watching( no poll watchers= no tallying votes), no rule changes 3 months prior to election, Armed MILITARY to enforce rules on FEDERAL ELECTIONS, Armed Military presence at polling stations and the transportation and verification of ballot pickups and security (min 2 man/woman verification), and Total continuous video and audio monitoring of all actions within the counting area.

Hey, this is no different than the precautions when we were moving "toys" around in the B-52s that were on "Alert". Yea, think about it. There was a REALLY GOOD REASON to not cross that red painted line on the asphalt between an the free zone and an active loaded B-52 asset. Hint: There was no "warning shot".

WWG1WGA

2
enough_of_the_racism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly! I don’t know if this can happen, but I am hoping we get federally run elections for President, senators, and reps. Standardized rules for all states. When you count, how you can vote, etc. if states want to screw around with their in state elections then go for it, but when California messes with five house races and denies the house a Republican majority, they are disenfranchising every Republican voter in every state.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
11
cmonman 11 points ago +11 / -0

Joe cracks open another Ensure.

7
Winged_Splinter 7 points ago +7 / -0

I've heard that when the media declares a winner and they give their acceptance it becomes harder to challenge the selection. I don't believe that is even close to true, but it was said by some guest they had on newsmax. I don't see how the media declaring who won means anything and if you are running for the highest office in this country and don't understand how our elections work, you probably shouldn't running in the first place.

4
2020REBOUND [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

It depends if the courts are swayed by it or not. If not we win.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
3
AdeptTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Take no poisoners and let God sort them out****legally speaking*****

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
2020REBOUND [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

HEHE BOTH! Don't let your memes be dreams!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
redhot_alex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biden just got cancelled. Congratulations Biden, you fucking moron. You just made the absolute shit-ass wrong move in the history of the Democratic party.

1
MAGAbeast2016 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honest vote count or we move to more drastic measures the founding fathers demanded of us.

1
Trump-45 1 point ago +1 / -0

THAT’S OUR PRESIDENT!!!

-2
GrizzleFist -2 points ago +7 / -9

This is several hours old man, you need to stop being like the media and falsely stating stuff

10
2020REBOUND [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

ok buddy why is it not on top of TD? WTF?

This is the most important statement of the day!

9
GrizzleFist 9 points ago +10 / -1

It was for an hour or two I think, news is fast and if something is more than 2-4 hours old it usually is unpinned to make room for newer things

7
2020REBOUND [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

true. It's still saturday and people are in and out and not up to date. This is a huge statement everyone needs to read for the day! I see a lot of depressing comments.

I'm HYPED after that statement!

3
GrizzleFist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fair enough

2
Winged_Splinter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldn't worry about that. Things like this that have made it to the top will still be easily found when you switch tabs to rising. In other words, if you weren't here for the day and wanted to see what was trending previously, go the rising tab and you'll see everything in there.

5
TakingCoatsWIN 5 points ago +5 / -0

How the hell is this "falsely stating stuff"?

It's from TODAY!!!!

Is Trump's statement only "new" withing the first 10 minutes and then anyone posting it as new, on the same day, is making a fake statement?

I've been posting here all day and I even missed it until now.

3
GrizzleFist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Relaxed, was just saying that it was false in that it isn't 'new'

3
TakingCoatsWIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah i know, that's what i'm objecting to, lol.

It's not false in that it isn't new though, it is NEW. I believed you at first and thought it might be something from the 2018 midterm elections and then i saw it was from TODAY!

That means it is new. It's something you have already seen, but it's still new.

1
GrizzleFist 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see, alight I concede my point.

2
TakingCoatsWIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's all good brother.

We do have to be vigilant for fakeness here.