8722
Comments (685)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
2terms3scoops 3 points ago +5 / -2

the benfords claim is weak, I ran the numbers on the 2016 election yesterday and the trend for Hillary was essentially the same, the votes per ward doesn't span enough orders of magnitude to properly use benfords, I can upload the graphs if anyone is interested. There was certainly high levels of fraud in Milwaukee but it'll be easier to prove with the freakishly high turnout the benfords.

Edit: Graph and Code

6
PleistoceneBeasts 6 points ago +6 / -0

There was a reason Hillary didn't ask for recounts then...

1
2terms3scoops 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish it was because of clear fraud but benfords doesn't mean much when all the counts are in between 100 and 1000, it just mean Hillary/biden tended to get about 4/600 and Trump tended to get 1/200 in the wards in that particularly county