Some people have been posting an academic article on how this law has been deboonked. Don't let this confuse you, the article was heavily criticised by other papers.
Milwaukee was stolen don't get me wrong, but Benford's law really doesn't apply here. Benford applies to natural numbers. Milwaukee election wards are artifically designated with a narrow range of voters. Biden's and Trump's charts both perfectly reflect a 70-30 split of the median ward size.
Some people have been posting an academic article on how this law has been deboonked. Don't let this confuse you, the article was heavily criticised by other papers.
Benfords law has been reboonked, effectively.
Milwaukee was stolen don't get me wrong, but Benford's law really doesn't apply here. Benford applies to natural numbers. Milwaukee election wards are artifically designated with a narrow range of voters. Biden's and Trump's charts both perfectly reflect a 70-30 split of the median ward size.
Explain to me then, how do Clinton's numbers in 2016 perfectly check out? Trump's numbers this year, as well as all other candidates, also check out
They donβt check out, check my post history for the chart.