4651
Comments (183)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
anton1k 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shapiro is elitist, maybe a conservative elitist, but he never was one of us. Just like the snob Ann Coulter - she is on the other side of the Hollywood snobs, but she absolutely wants to be the establishment, so that the roles are reversed, but that is the only difference. Our movement is counter-elitist. Shapiro may be fun to watch when he presents some conservative arguments, so watching the "best Shapiro moments" is the best you can get. I would not go to him for daily political commentary - the timing of his show is not great, it is always obsolete information by the time you listen, he is boring, and also he is not a great inspiration. I remember listening to his show a few times during the early stages of Covid, as he was shitting his pants, that is never fun or productive to listen to.

Tim Pool is ok so far, in my opinion, if you can tolerate his rants or imminent civil war predictions. He is informative, at least, you don't have to agree to all his commentary.

Rogan's shows could be interesting to listen, but I wouldn't trust the guy, I would not want a friend like him. Maybe a neighbor who comes over for BBQ and has entertaining stories to tell, but I would not trust him to rely in him as on a friend. The same for Rubin, only that Rubin's show is not as interesting as Joe's. I don't like how these guys threw Stefan Molyneux under the bus. They invite him and talk to him as if they can trust each other, but later when it is politically inconvenient, they refer to him as "that Molyneux guy". I would not have problem with them if they were not too warm to him in the first place. No, Rubin is in this for the money, Joe is for the money and for his ego.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0