679
Comments (21)
sorted by:
18
AintSeenCrazyYet 18 points ago +18 / -0

Why use these machines at all. Simply hand count and hand record the ballots with poll watchers from the major parties there and close by to monitor and object to any ballots that appear dysfunctional. It worked for hundreds of years before computers.

7
COnDEMnED 7 points ago +7 / -0

I agree with the hand count and machine recount, by a different counting company, but only after the ballots have been audited, and the National Guard does the counting.

Let’s really see the type of fraud we’re looking at here.

3
mellestal 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the only thing that's really needed is the National guard to secure the room....

Anyone entering or leaving the area is searched (strip search if necessary), the door is locked and an armed guard standing ready.

Now you can no longer bring in a box of votes without it being logged in at the very least. Can't sneak it in in your lunch box.

Edit: Every single ballot box should be signed by atleast 2 poll workers selected by and from each party (4) as well as the head poll worker(s) from each party at the time the box is sealed.

Hell I'd just rent out a small hotel, lock the place down completely and have the counters stay for the night(s). Use their ball room or conference area for the counting.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
AintSeenCrazyYet 4 points ago +4 / -0

It operates on the keep it simple stupid process. Everything is above board and there is not "mysterious" code that can be hacked or quietly written to shift votes one way or another that is undetectable. It worked for centuries but we now need electronic tabulating machines? Please.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Loiuzein 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great now I have to go put the gun back to sleep. I just got her settled down and now she's firing double-aught all over. Ugh.

3
mixednuts86 3 points ago +3 / -0

Computers make everything more simple. Including cheating.

13
COnDEMnED 13 points ago +13 / -0

If it keeps happening, it’s not a glitch, it’s a feature.

9
Bonami 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is not a glitch, this is a feature and there are a lot more features to this software. This video describes some capabilities: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=youtu.be

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
Red_Privilege 3 points ago +3 / -0

As a software engineer, I won't play any software based gambling device. It's far too easy to parameterize logic and algorithms in order to skew results. These are not glitches but well thought out features. We must demand source code for review from a device sitting on the floor that was used election day.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
easedel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its a glitch when caught and want to prevent investigations.

If not caught, its a feature only a few know of

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
donotclickjim 2 points ago +2 / -0

Another?

The NPCs in the Twitterverse keep telling me it was just an isolated human error and not a computer "glitch"

2
Sanctii 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the word is feature, not glitch.

1
NYC_Deplorable 1 point ago +1 / -0

So how many counties total is that now?

1
easedel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure just a glitch....even though it happened back in 2018 and Warren and Klobauch actually brought it up when questioning H I G McCarthy about their financials and such

Link comes up funky so try the shortened link if it doesn't work

https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/H.I.G.%20McCarthy,%20&%20Staple%20Street%20letters.pdf

shorturl.at/exJQR

1
Slim 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, they specifically mention Pennsylvania elections being cheated.

“And, just this year, after the Democratic candidate's electronic tally showed he received an improbable 164 votes out of 55,000 cast in a Pennsylvania state judicial election in 2019, the county's Republican Chairwoman said, " [n]othing went right on Election Day. Everything went wrong. That's a problem.”

We should get Warren to speak out about the improbably results this election too.

1
Espot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this the third “glitch” in Michigan??