Wikipedia removed the election fraud section in the Benford's Law article earlier today!
(media.patriots.win)
🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by TurboLover69
+1631 / -0
Comments (33)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
Front
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
they're the first perpetual motion devices, propelled by huffing their own farts.
Wikipedia is heavily funded by Clinton and even Soros groups these days. They removed their Neutral POV policy years ago and one of the co-founders was extremely critical of them for doing that. Now Google uses the articles on news sources to rank their trustworthiness. Thus Breitbart is labeled "far-right" and no amount of effort to change that label works because some editors absolutely dominate the ability to fix them. The result is that Google buries Breitbart links in search results. Meanwhile, edits critical of left wing news sources is futile because the edits are removed instantly. Even the wikipedia article proclaiming that the Hunter Biden laptop was a "false" "conspiracy theory" was locked up and loaded with disinfo to try to discredit it.
Wikipedia was begging for money in their site once. I guess they got the funding, but it came with a cost.
I used to donate to them, back when the neutral POV thing was in existence. It's so sad too, because Wikipedia was once a great resource.
Why I would never give them a fucking penny.
their can be only one
Surely the people who do this feel a bit like Stalin.
We are over the target, gentlemen!!
Add it back!
They've locked the article from editing.
Edit the talk page.
Put it back!!
Article is locked from editing.
Libs delete info on mathematical laws. Who are the science deniers now?
This is communist behaviour. Fuckers need to be held accountable.
They are getting scared!
Facebook is going hard after the Bernard stuff on Biden too. Attaching misinformation labels and prevent posts from being shared.
Wikipedia calls the social network Gab a "safe haven for extremists including neo-Nazis, white supremacists, the alt-right...and anti-semitism." I guess that's what they call anything that doesn't censor free speech.
They are completely unreliable for anything remotely political and it seems criminal the way search engines promote Wiki's biased content.
Yes, what did it say before they took it out? That the Benford’s shouldn’t be used for voting? But, it should be. There’s nothing wrong with using it in voting except in certain circumstances, which, none of those occurred to invalidate it
What did it say about election data before?
And this is why I always happily ignore wikipedia cries for donations
Use https://infogalactic.com, its based
Wikipedia operates exactly as the ministry of truth did. Scrubbing and removing sections daily, conflicting accounts, people huddled in front of machines rewriting history
But it does not remove it from court precedent...