https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1604808607771m.jpg
Okay this is it lads.
I was here yesterday late night/early morning 2-3AM making these graphs. As promised I included Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Arizona
I got all the information from the official Secretary of State websites from the respective states. Voter turnout was calculated using Total Votes/Registered Voters
INB4 That's now how you do it
Yes it is as explained in
https://www.fairvote.org/measuring_voter_turnout
Anon's kept referencing this academic paper last night
https://www.pnas.org/content/109/41/16469
to show evidence that voter fraud may happen. Again this does not prove it but it says "IT IS A LIKELY POSSIBILITY IT DID"
As you can see in the graph this is clearly happening in the Swing States.
Georgia fucked up HARD and had over 100%+ voter turnout.
Which is probably why this tweet was made
https://twitter.com/GaSecofState/status/1325206123784228865
Other anons are looking into Dominion Voting Software. I will be transparent and give you my excel file so you can take a look at the data yourself.
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=50076791297889045412
I'll make this thread again later tonight when the shills aren't so active to get wider reach.
Also just adding this too incase you are not convinced about Georgia.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/same-day-registration.aspx
Georgia DOES NOT have same day registration.
MI and WI yes.
I also added a Histogram to showcase the distribution of voter turnout to the graph. As you can see it does not follow a normal distribution as you'd expect especially for a data set this large. It is bi-modial.
Godspeed.
https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1604808607771m.jpg
Okay this is it lads.
I was here yesterday late night/early morning 2-3AM making these graphs. As promised I included Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Arizona
I got all the information from the official Secretary of State websites from the respective states. Voter turnout was calculated using Total Votes/Registered Voters
>INB4 That's now how you do it
Yes it is as explained in
https://www.fairvote.org/measuring_voter_turnout
Anon's kept referencing this academic paper last night
https://www.pnas.org/content/109/41/16469
to show evidence that voter fraud may happen. Again this does not prove it but it says "IT IS A LIKELY POSSIBILITY IT DID"
As you can see in the graph this is clearly happening in the Swing States.
Georgia fucked up HARD and had over 100%+ voter turnout.
Which is probably why this tweet was made
https://twitter.com/GaSecofState/status/1325206123784228865
Other anons are looking into Dominion Voting Software. I will be transparent and give you my excel file so you can take a look at the data yourself.
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=50076791297889045412
I'll make this thread again later tonight when the shills aren't so active to get wider reach.
Also just adding this too incase you are not convinced about Georgia.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/same-day-registration.aspx
Georgia DOES NOT have same day registration.
MI and WI yes.
I also added a Histogram to showcase the distribution of voter turnout to the graph. As you can see it does not follow a normal distribution as you'd expect especially for a data set this large. It is bi-modial.
Godspeed.
How
https://protectthevote.com/
halfway down the page
ALL PEDES: Copy and submit text below to https://defendyourballot.formstack.com/forms/incident_report
begin text:
Below is a copied forum post from 4chan with suggested evidence of MATHEMATICAL/STATISTICAL proof for voter fraud in WISCONSIN, GEORGIA, and MICHIGAN.
https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1604808607771m.jpg
Okay this is it lads. I was here yesterday late night/early morning 2-3AM making these graphs. As promised I included Wisconsin, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Arizona I got all the information from the official Secretary of State websites from the respective states. Voter turnout was calculated using Total Votes/Registered Voters
INB4 That's now how you do it Yes it is as explained in
https://www.fairvote.org/measuring_voter_turnout
Anon's kept referencing this academic paper last night
https://www.pnas.org/content/109/41/16469
to show evidence that voter fraud may happen. Again this does not prove it but it says "IT IS A LIKELY POSSIBILITY IT DID" As you can see in the graph this is clearly happening in the Swing States. Georgia fucked up HARD and had over 100%+ voter turnout. Which is probably why this tweet was made
https://twitter.com/GaSecofState/status/1325206123784228865
Other anons are looking into Dominion Voting Software. I will be transparent and give you my excel file so you can take a look at the data yourself.
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=50076791297889045412
I'll make this thread again later tonight when the shills aren't so active to get wider reach.
Also just adding this too incase you are not convinced about Georgia.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/same-day-registration.aspx
Georgia DOES NOT have same day registration. MI and WI yes.
I also added a Histogram to showcase the distribution of voter turnout to the graph. As you can see it does not follow a normal distribution as you'd expect especially for a data set this large. It is bi-modial.
Godspeed.
:end text
Done, although I was curious what I was supposed to put in for Ballot Station, County, and State.
Here's the image backed up so it isn't on 4chan (too transient for reliability in longevity).
Get it to project veritas and I'm sure James will be able to get it to Rudy G.
I just emailed Veritas.
This is legit! Thank you for your hard work!
Can you please explain this to me like I'm 70.
Unexplained spikes, literally incomprehensible spikes, fake votes are the only logical explainable reason. Now you understand why the "mail in" was pushed so hard. You can go to the grocery store, but can't go do your civic duty in person?
As I read it - distributions on such charts should be a single round or elongated blob in case of fair elections as there are natural statistical fluctuations between how people vote and how many of them vote in each individual voting precinct.
In top left corner you can see distributions of past elections from other countries - e.g. Czech Rep, Poland, Spain are examples of "good" distributions. On the other hand Russia '11, Russia '12, Uganda - are examples of rigged elections, where you can see main normal blob and kind of tail and another pronounced blob in top right corner (which means several voting precincts use fake ballots to acheive almost 100% voter turnout and virtually all votes cast for winner)
On the right is main chart which clearly shows abnormality because it is 3 very narrow groups rather than single big roughly round-shaped blob. This actually means centralized state-level cheating.
This guy knows how to rig elections.
Haha. I actually read quite a lot about Russian elections. They are rigged but differently, because voting system is different as well as it's simple majority vote. BTW someone just posted this - related - https://thedonald.win/p/11PpU6Jurv/wapo-used-benfords-law-to-show-p/c/
Thanks Vlad.
and that's how one might go about rigging an election.... umm so a friend told him.
I looked at it and even if you just look at Trump's numbers, they are elongated. I wonder if that is because they were throwing away Trump ballots.
They took every avenue of cheating this time. Throw away Trump ballots, stuff the ballot box, flip votes with electronic machines, disenfranchise voters with fake polling, USPS backdating ballots and throwing away ballots.
It may not have been coordinated, but the narrative the past four years made every D from top to bottom simultaneously say "it's ok to do this"
Hey there buddy, I see your cabinet just resigned and you're looking into constitutional reform. I was wondering if you'd like to come over to America and try your hand at working for the Democratic National Committee and the Center for American Progress. We could use someone with your talents.
P.S. Sorry about the false accusations over the past four years, you know how it can be.
Sincerely,
John Podesta
bro i'm mid 20s and dont get it
NPC - NO!! You can't just use numbers to prove widespread fraud! There's no evidence. We hid everything!!
Math pedes - HAHA!! Statistical regression analyses go BBBBRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!
Look at each color individually, as a "blob". When the centre of the Biden blobs is lower, how can he win? Well, with a few counties with 100% turnout - when the centers of the blobs are ALL lower than Trump. It's highly improbable for this to occur in one state, but in all... this is close as you get to a statistical proof of fraud.
Our fellow 'pede looks to have come up with the goods here.
ES&S also needs to be looked at. They control 60% of the market and sold part of their business to Dominion in 2010. Significant history of fraud in the early 2000s. Partly owned by Chuck Hagel and just last year, they were accused of audit issues in PA. I'm interested in seeing what shenanigans their internet connected machines were doing. Https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_Systems_%26_Software
ES&S caught in Wisconsin! Posted an hour ago on twitter https://mobile.twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1325550738525851648
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/nov/26/philadelphias-voting-machines-challenged-in-federa/
They've also had issues in SC. https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-state-sunday/20201101/281582358138081
And in Dallas TX, during the primaries, suspicious vote tallying happened with ES&S machines.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/03/08/sketchy-44-dallas-county-precincts-were-not-included-in-super-tuesday-results-election-officials-request-recount/
Found another issue with ES&S! https://www.vice.com/en/article/3kxzk9/exclusive-critical-us-election-systems-have-been-left-exposed-online-despite-official-denials
Posts like this make me more and more depressed. Shit like
"Again this does not prove it but it says "IT IS A LIKELY POSSIBILITY IT DID"
Doesn't matter whatso-ever if it can't be proven. Moron left already think they won, WE NEED ACTIONABLE PROOF. WE'RE LOSING GROUND WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT
Yup, they're going to roll over on their bluff very quickly. They bluffing for the presidency, we just gotta call them out.
What their real goals here are:
Yup, they likely intended to isolate fraud to the software, but have been supplementing like crazy with other traditional forms of fraud, particularly once even all of that failed on election night.
Once these minions start getting arrested on traditional forms of fraud, we'll have a nice legal to slap in the big players.
Learn stats or listen to those who understand. There is no such thing as a certainty in stats.
But this is pretty fucking close
We don't need proof if we quit being pussies and relying on courts to do all our work for us.
If we had the same balls our forefathers did we'd have resolved this issue ourselves already.
The point of these statistical dives is we can go down to the exact fraudulent precincts or counties and audit those.
Recounting costs money, very expensive to do an entire state. A court can easily order a tiny recount focused on where fraud is most likely to occur.
Stats narrow the focus, auditing will expose it. Drives to audit are proceeding well.
ELI5:
the graphs should look like lumps of blots
when there is fraud. it looks smeared.
meaning some group took the 'organic data' and manipulated it to their desired result
in OP graph you can see how theres all this extra data on that 'smears' for biden
way to go data pedes!
EVERYONE SUBMIT TO https://defendyourballot.formstack.com/forms/incident_report NOW
Somebody tell me what all this shit is
We have the best autists. Tremendous people. Absolutely incredible. Believe me.
They are beautiful people. You can ask anyone. This is why we WIN. Other sites have autists that are suckers and losers. Probably some are in antifa, I think. SAD.
The x and y axis don't make sense to me. Seems the y axis units should be multiplied by 100. The x axis units don't seem to make sense. 1.8% max turnout?
What is max turnout? 100% is the 0 line probably (i haven't looked at it) but I stats. Even so, some of these maths are above my patience level
I'm also confused by the same thing. I don't think this actually shows anything to be honest. I can't see the colors clearly, but each blob seems to be the data from a state.
If you believe that the distribution for each state is different, than this graph doesn't really show anything at all.
nice. btw it is spelled 'habbening'
hapbning
hadbpning
That's awesome. By any chance do you have your data in a spreadsheet or something I can use? The paper actually developed a model that ESTIMATES the amount of fraud using statistical inference.
If I got the data I could probably compute the posterior probability of fraud based loosely on the paper's model.
u/Trumanblack can you provide this in a resolution that's from at least the year 2000?
Could you please share the code e.g. via GitHub or describe methodology in more detail so we can reproduce?
Gather all the mathematical evidece, archive it, showcase it in a easy to understand form.
Don’t forget about the incredible statistics of mail voting, a major red pill
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's a lot of work. :)
We need stop looking at "states" as a whole and start looking at "counties" individually within the problem states. The problems are often county specific.
The polls were not packed in MI and WIS so same day registration was not going on in a massive way.
WAIT... WAIT... WAIT... Just wait one darn second. Some anon gave me this equally as unreadable graphic that looks just like OP except that Georgia averages 70% voter turnout. We're really onto something and I dont want to fake news my fb frens. Who am I to believe, Anon or Anon?
https://ibb.co/Hx2b4Cm
Saved
Brilliant!
BUMP
This is the smoking gun