100% agree. Even in the worst case scenario, a bug like this, if it got into a major election before discovery, it'd not only invalidate the whole election (...hmmm!), but it'd have to be fixed as the absolute highest priority and certainly before the next election.
And yet, I read somewhere on here that this problem's been in play since 2016 and was documented sometime in 2018.
Oh, I'll add that even human error wouldn't skew towards one candidate exclusively. Thus, intentional "feature" or else an intentionally exploited vulnerability (fraud).
100% agree. Even in the worst case scenario, a bug like this, if it got into a major election before discovery, it'd not only invalidate the whole election (...hmmm!), but it'd have to be fixed as the absolute highest priority and certainly before the next election.
And yet, I read somewhere on here that this problem's been in play since 2016 and was documented sometime in 2018.
Oh, I'll add that even human error wouldn't skew towards one candidate exclusively. Thus, intentional "feature" or else an intentionally exploited vulnerability (fraud).