613
Comments (73)
sorted by:
61
deleted 61 points ago +66 / -5
30
ArizonaIceMonkey 30 points ago +31 / -1

I wouldn't assume Gen. Flynn follows larps on twitter.

6
FuckRioters 6 points ago +7 / -1

I follow all kinds of people, doesn't mean I have the ability to know if they're all legit. Even some of the people I mostly trust do exaggerate sometimes.

I've seen way too much "it's happening" to get excited.

4
ArizonaIceMonkey 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ain't that the truth. After all the shit that's been pulled over the last four years.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
7
ArizonaIceMonkey 7 points ago +7 / -0

Check out the twitter feed.

13
deleted 13 points ago +17 / -4
12
ArizonaIceMonkey 12 points ago +12 / -0

Speaking from experience?

16
deleted 16 points ago +18 / -2
11
ArizonaIceMonkey 11 points ago +11 / -0

Ok I have no idea about any off this. I find it odd that a presumably member of the 82nd airborne who is followed by I'm assuming the General Flynn would be playing juvenile games suggestive of something so serious in a time like this.

2
Aisle-is-closed 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not to say a SCIF can’t have communication outside of itself. You are correct that it is a sectioned of area with limited to no outside contact. However, there is room for the possibility that a highly specific and fully secured line of communication from somewhere else was accessible inside it.

2
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can confirm. Uncle is glowie. No internet and cable in a sciff.

16
GunTottinPatriot 16 points ago +16 / -0

Wouldn't be surprised if this disinformation is coming straight from the CCP/DNC to keep us distracted from fraud evidence collecting, they said in the next few days arrests are coming, if no arrests than I don't wanna see this posted again please

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
Sum9 [S] 7 points ago +9 / -2

Larp? Can you explain?

5
rubmewithbeer 5 points ago +5 / -0

LARP = Live action role playing. Like a renascence fair.

He's saying the person on twitter is LARPING possibly for attention who knows, basically it's a fake reality

1
Sum9 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh God, I will hate that many forever if he was just buttering the Infowars staff with false hope. -_-

I will apologize to everyone if this turns out to be a lie.

Sorry ahead of time guys! I want this to be true but lets all pray that goodness and God's righteousness prevails.

4
Lenny_Kravitz2 4 points ago +8 / -4

I am not convinced about HAMMER and SCORECARD bit. I need more evidence that those systems were used.

9
chopz 9 points ago +11 / -2

By the time you get the evidence it is too late. it was reported on extensively way the fuck back in 2009 and brought up again after the last Kentucky Gov. race.

Detection is done in real time otherwise all you have are indications of fraud.

Someone like Powell probably wouldn't even mention something that exists that completely ruins American trust in our entire voter system.

I'll never vote again on a voter machine. If I get a vote at all. At this point I want a certified fucking receipt handed to me that my ballot counted but even then I don't know.

Our election system has shattered.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
36
deleted 36 points ago +41 / -5
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Bonami 3 points ago +3 / -0

But could you?

26
deleted 26 points ago +30 / -4
19
Bonami 19 points ago +19 / -0

And he can calmly explain the room was used for govt business specifically to track an insurrection.

7
1337Gandalf 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law. Its main provision prohibits civil service employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president and vice president, from engaging in some forms of political activity. It became law on August 2, 1939. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico. It was most recently amended in 2012.

1: Doesn't apply to the President.

2: He was watching the fucking news on his tv in the home portion of the white house...

This is ridiculous.

2
Demonrat2020 2 points ago +3 / -1

Thank you!

20
Spez_Banned_My_Cat 20 points ago +22 / -2

I want this to be true, but like all potential Larps, assume fake until I hear it from Trump or Giuliani

16
K-Harbour 16 points ago +18 / -2

Totally fake picture!

Cute, however!

Nice shadows those chairs cast.

Nice plants!

9
Kyro5411 9 points ago +10 / -1

Windows 8!!😂

8
Bonami 8 points ago +8 / -0

It is the renderings done by the architectural firm that did the space. Maybe no photos of it are allowed?

10
magamagashii 10 points ago +10 / -0

I can assure you no photos are allowed. No cameras, no cellphones, no USB drives, nothing that can store data. Including smart watches...nothing with a microphone, etc.

And the real deal is probably significantly different than what we see here--its just a conceptional rendering.

4
Stickybedel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can confirm 100%

Usually VERY bland...

Most, you can't bring smart phones on campus, or even in proximity to the SCIF.

1
Bonami 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you saying this room is for internal WH IT functions? Or is it a high security monitoring room for any and all communications, which to me makes more sense.

1
magamagashii 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, a SCIF is a secure area where you can handle our nation's top secrets. It's just a very secure area with strict access controls. Nothing too cloak and dagger about it and nothing to blow out of proportions.

1
Bonami 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was assuming it is a secure communications area, which would mean they could watch the election in real time and catch the use of SCOREBOARD software, the changes are done in mili seconds and are undetectable unless you can access the underlying program, which I assume Trump and co can. The room would have been used to document the steal IMO

9
BadgerPuncher 9 points ago +11 / -2

Who the fuck is Tom Graham and can he back this up?

Seems like bullshit.

7
NoCoincidence 7 points ago +7 / -0

A twitter account followed by General Flynn posts a video featuring Dr Charlie Ward telling us it was a sting.

Dr Charlie Ward featured in a group chat with Mary Fanning.

Fanning authored the article mentioned on Bannon's Warroom with General McInerney.

Flynn's attorney has already discussed Hammer / Scorecard via Fox Business.

Please oh please let this be it.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
NoCoincidence 3 points ago +3 / -0

It would seem so. It was just nice to see Flynn's attorney stump Dobbs and Fitton, they really didn't know what to think.

Flynn himself has mentioned the Dominion machines, so cybersecurity is becoming an important theme.

spez: Not blueballing myself over "arrests". But man I want to believe.

5
BadgerPuncher 5 points ago +5 / -0

Are we sure about this...

3
Techsan 3 points ago +4 / -1

No

3
Jmk1970 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm not sure one way or the other but rember he was going to spend election night at Trump D.C and he abruptly cancelled it just a few days before the election. Did he every give a reason?

3
brownguy 3 points ago +4 / -1

Can someone please explain this to me like I'm AOC

5
UhtredRagnarok 5 points ago +5 / -0

This suggests Trump used epic tracking software to observe and log in real time all computers that tabulated and stored election results, if so, Trump has completely exposed the deepstate and it will be impossible to deny, actual justice could actually be delivered.

It sounds too good to be true but God I hope it is

3
Optigrabz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Evidence of the crime..... but can it point directly to the criminal? My worry is that Russian interference will be blamed for any impropriety.

2
UhtredRagnarok 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've read shit Pelosi and Feinstein were owners of the companies that managed this shit?

1
Sum9 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

From what I understand Blockchain is so secure it is impossible for an outside hack to manipulate the evidence it gathers. Quantum level encryption and shit.

Sorry, I'm not a tech nerd. Just repeating things I've heard.

3
Theyreallinonit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone already archived this twitter post 30 minutes ago, your a legend..

https://archive.is/hPIqh

2
WEWONTQUIT 2 points ago +3 / -1

THIS IS GOING TO BE ONE OF THE BIGGEST WEEKS IN THE HISTORY OF THE USA!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
bigntazt 2 points ago +3 / -1

Really wish this was true, but if it sounds too good to be true.....

2
namaste_trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

hope its 100% true!!!

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
tech87 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSKk7YSM768

Bad video, but same type of "sting" operation?

1
DJ_Trump2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

Hope it's true, but the fact it's being talked about by some British guy that doesn't work in our government makes me skeptical. How would he get clearance for such a thing?

1
kornesque 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doubt. But hoping - I'll believe it when Trump tells us.

1
HiGloss 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right.

Who's this twitter account...never heard of him.