253
posted ago by americanzoomer ago by americanzoomer +253 / -0

I always knew he was a grifter, but now he’s basically blackpilling everyone and saying that there is not enough time to expose fraud before the inauguration. he’s now telling people to give money so they can help campaign for the Georgia senate runoff. Everything is a grift for these people.

Comments (53)
sorted by:
39
deleted 39 points ago +39 / -0
16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
5
CitizenPlain 5 points ago +5 / -0

That sounds out of character. What is his beef? The team is doing everything they can. No one has more on the line than Trump and his family.

The fraud is too blatant and open to succeed. Trump will have 4 more years.

1
EdisonHwy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crooked judges (think Sullivan) and their ilk will run-out the constitutional clock, IMHO.        /#sad_face

2
BidenHunter 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's up & down like a manic depressive. Too much coke.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
TakingCoatsWIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cernovich has been fighting for Trump since the election steal even was at an election place in Arizona rallying people. Don't know if he's cucked out since then.

I put Charlie Kirk in the Ben Shapiro camp. A globalist neocon.

30
magabirdlady 30 points ago +30 / -0

Seriously all these Charlie Kirk types people are here because of President Trump. Nobody will care about their podcast if POTUS goes. All of them!

4
polyking 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. No one is there to listen to them wax "intellectually" about conservative values. They think they're like Jordan Peterson or something. They're ideas are neither original or special.

26
BaritoneAssoluto 26 points ago +26 / -0

Steve Bannon called him out on his show a few days ago and I expected it as soon as I saw him years ago. Tree of Life also called him out too (and she called out Candice for her website where she had a database that AOC and former Obama aides are making to track us Trump supporters but only for those who said "hate speech".)

13
Vizrahen 13 points ago +13 / -0

Candice was a default liberal, I believe that the criticism against her website is what got her into politics in the first place.

Just like Ian Miles Cheong was on the woke side of gamergate, but ended up on the conservative side afterwards.

23
flopperdog 23 points ago +23 / -0

He'll be singing a different tune very soon

21
Strike_Eagle784 21 points ago +21 / -0

Well, that, and he's saying that "Republicans didn't do enough". The voter fraud is so immense that there was probably no chance of legitimately overrunning it in the states it occurred in. It's all up to the courts now, and I imagine that was Trump's plan from Day 1.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
15
maybyte 15 points ago +16 / -1

I never listened to the reactionaries and grifters, but I hope this makes everyone stop following them and Fox. Newsflash: As long as they keep their millions and live in their own ivory tower they give 0 fucks about you or this country

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +5 / -4
3
japandude 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I was wondering the same. Tucker's post-election tone seemed different.

15
IGfodder 15 points ago +16 / -1

Not enough time? The investigation literally started on 5th. How can we do it any earlier than that? Plus with how fast information is coming out I wouldnt be suprised if this was over by the end of the month. Kirk is a dumbfuck.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
4
VTubersAreWorthTheSi 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is he the same idiot who didn't know what the different farming designs were.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
polyking 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think that was Kyle Kulinski who didn't know what farms looked like.

https://www.mrctv.org/blog/populist-left-youtuber-mystified-sight-farms

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
Sigma 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yep. That's the case with pretty much all politicians and "personalities".

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
4
MrFrog3D 4 points ago +6 / -2

Huh? I only know his tweets but he has not said Biden won, and says he wants more people to support President Trump. Very confused by all these Kirk and Pool are cucking posts.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
pyre2001 2 points ago +2 / -0

A couple of days ago he did a whole podcast on all of the fraud happening. Which is more than almost anyone on Fox.

4
nanowerx 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm no fan of Charlie by any means, but his last few Tweets about Trump are saying "every legal vote counts" and telling people to take note of the Republicans who aren't backing Trump.

Doesn't look like he is pushing a concede at all.

0
dominion-bot 0 points ago +1 / -1

Expect more back-pedaling where that came from.

3
GodfreydeBullion 3 points ago +3 / -0

He always gave me the Willie's. Fuck him and his tiny face.

1
BidenHunter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Name checks out. Hunchbacks for Trump!

2
BidenHunter 2 points ago +2 / -0

The guy has always been a fake. And he looks retarded, so...

2
DirtyWilly 2 points ago +3 / -1

I've watched all his coverage from every night. He didn't basically say there's not enough time...

Here if you want to view it. https://youtu.be/ZlQf6C2OVvk?t=3209

4
Monny 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's absolutely not cucking like this guy said.

I listened to him tonight and he is by no means backing down. He actually remains quite hopeful.

Never listened to him before these last couple nights

2
Smubbs 2 points ago +8 / -6

I was watching him say this and I didn’t much like it either. But he’s not wrong . We have like 2 months to build the biggest fraud case in world history

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
2
vicentezo04 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, nowhere in the Constitution does it say we have to appoint electors based on questionable vote counts. This is why people need to call their R representatives and tell them to stop this nonsense.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
rn10950 2 points ago +2 / -0

He has Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell. He will be just fine.

1
Magafactured 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not contradicting you, but my understanding was that Joe Biden had several times the funds available to Trump during the election.

And if Trump is now going against the Biden fags in court, he now has more money than his opponent?

No blackpills here, it’s just a to do list for me - looking for some quantifiers.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
AUGUSTO_PINOCHET 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck Charlie Kirk

1
mwoley63 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not defending his cuck status but that is an important race that we need to win, regardless if GEOTUS wins or not.

With that race won GEOTUS reaches God mode in his second term.

1
Aeronomer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have zero respect for him or Candace Owens. They both threw Dave Rubin under the bus for a photo op with Kanye. Told me exactly who they are.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
_Cabal_ 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's very easy to tell who is who.

Take any name. Think about who they were before Trump, and who they've been since Trump.

If you find they were relatively nobodies, or small time before Trump, and are now very popular since attaching themselves to Trump. That's your first clue.

But that isn't necessarily enough to be certain. This applies to A LOT of people, after all.

So, they've clearly gained. But have they sacrificed? Has their sacrifice compared to their gain? That's your second clue.

Chances are, most of them have gained more than they've sacrificed, if they've sacrificed anything at all. And remember, if it was easy to do for them, it wasn't a sacrifice.

But maybe we still need a bit more, to be sure.

Third and fourth clue. Were the anti-Trump, anti-Conservative, and anti-America First before Trump won? And are they folding like a lawn chair now?

If the answer to all of these clues is yes, then you have yourself a full house of faggotry.