7022
Comments (710)
sorted by:
468
Mother_of_gains 468 points ago +471 / -3

Decent read

630
Frick_The_Dems2020 [S] 630 points ago +631 / -1 (edited)

People forget the msm and powers that be tried this shit in 2000 by declaring Gore the winner only to have the SCOTUS overturn it in GWB favor. President Trump has a great case and I expect there will be thousands of Biden votes tossed out.

Edit: This is the top comment on a Sky News Australia YT video..."Here in Europe people are talking about how utterly disgusting all these listed frauds have been...the entire world knows this was everything BUT an honest election"

445
getkek 445 points ago +448 / -3

I feel it's perhaps millions. Our red wave caused them to not only stuff ballots with mail-in fraud, but also shift our legit votes from Trump to Biden in an attempt to eat trumps historic lead causing the crazy 100-200% voter turn out scenarios across counties.

They have been exposed.

241
MemeSoldier 241 points ago +242 / -1

My only concern here is, I don't trust PA to separate the after-8PM ballots with integrity

If there is fraud in the first place, how can we expect them to do this part honestly? I mean you have ballots in Michigan arriving after the deadline that still counted (against state law)

175
deleted 175 points ago +175 / -0
140
Red-in-Tooth 140 points ago +140 / -0

Only option then is to toss them out! There should be an electronic and or paper trail of some kind leading up to those hours. If the damage is that bad - because it probably is - basically chuck everything after that period and suddenly Donald Trump wins again. Really weird how that worked out, isn't it?

64
deleted 64 points ago +64 / -0
78
ProdigalPlaneswalker 78 points ago +78 / -0

I don't always recommend Dosqualis.

But when I do, it's because they cheated.

Stay MAGA, my friends.

47
deleted 47 points ago +47 / -0
35
DonJr2024 35 points ago +35 / -0

I said revote but you're right. If one county can be shown to be completely untrustworthy, just lose its results. By a funny coincidence that would win it easily in 4 or 5 states (tossing one single county).

26
Nibba 26 points ago +26 / -0

Totally agree. They were pushing for early voting, so the people voting early should have been doing exactly that. Voting early. There is zero excuse for those with mail in ballots to turn them in even on Election Day. I knew I wasn’t going to make it to the polls on Election Day so I went downtown and voted early so my vote was in on time and ready to be counted on time. This entire thing is a total scam.

6
Southern_Belle 6 points ago +6 / -0

In 2016 I voted in Denver with a mail-in ballot.

I did not put it back in the mail; I drove to the polling site on election day and handed it to a poll worker who tossed it in a large container. There was a drive-thru just for this.

They also included a tracking number so you could go online and check that your vote had been registered.

This time, however, I voted in NC. Went in person, used the voting machine. Taking no chances.

6
Pederrr 6 points ago +6 / -0

My employer gave everyone paid time to vote early. Early voting was around for weeks. If "Trump killed the economy because covid" and everyone is without jobs, they had ample time to vote early. Unless you're work weeks are 30+ days, there's NO EXCUSE for late votes

16
Returningtogod 16 points ago +16 / -0

I agree that the only remedy in this case is to cancel out every vote that cannot be legitimized. The only way this fraud will ever stop is if the citizenry is disenfranchised because of it and they vote these people out of office. Otherwise, it will continue forever.

5
itpeeswhenibern 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you. Forward all complaints to the DNC for getting your vote thrown out by not following the rules.

2
winsome 2 points ago +2 / -0

Certified.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
7
Mobmando 7 points ago +7 / -0

Have they even kept them separate?

81
BACONndEGGS 81 points ago +81 / -0

Once you lose the chain of custody on the ballots and cant validate them. The only thing to do would be toss them. Unfortunately, some legal casted votes might get tossed but that's the fault of democrats

57
RighterThanU 57 points ago +57 / -0

This is going to be the argument ... “can’t toss these votes because there are some legitimate votes in there”. The obvious issue is that if you include illegal votes in order to count the legal ones then those legal ones get cancelled out. Legal voters would be disenfranchised either way so they should all be tossed.

42
stormcloud 42 points ago +42 / -0

Legal voters should be pissed as hell at the Democrats for doing this to them and remember it at election time from here on out.

23
Mr-J 23 points ago +23 / -0

Votes after election day are actually not valid per constitution. This will be brought up in the supreme court.

21
DonJr2024 21 points ago +22 / -1

As someone else said, you have to disqualify counties where the fraud has made it impossible to sort out. Just toss out everything they counted in Philly and Detroit, etc.

That is the perfect punishment because it punishes the side that cheated, clearly!

19
BACONndEGGS 19 points ago +19 / -0

yes, that will be their argument but it's the fruit of the poison tree kinda thing, By dems adding tons of fake ballots to the legit count they destroy the integrity of the real ones, now they all must go and the blame is at the feet of the democrats.

6
VetforTrump2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not legit if they are late

16
VetforTrump2 16 points ago +16 / -0

Doesn't matter. ANY VOTES AFTET THE DEADLINE GO. TRUMP ALREADY WON THE PRE DEADLINE COUNT the state is his the people

-16
deleted -16 points ago +4 / -20
18
MuhSoy 18 points ago +18 / -0

Democrats were willing to change the rules over MUH COVID and didn’t care to imagine the sort of mess that was being created - as if our voting systems were already reliable.

27
Worldtraveler0405 27 points ago +27 / -0

Didn't PA ignore Alito's 1st order and had to issue a 2nd one?

6
RallyinStJohnsWood 6 points ago +6 / -0

Shit, what's next ? A strongly worded order ?

Stand the fuck by, people !

10
ColoradoTrumper45 10 points ago +10 / -0

You do realize that arrest orders are in fact, "strongly worded letters" signed by judges.

24
ProudWhiteMan 24 points ago +24 / -0

Nope they stopped after counting the election vote than started counting mail in votes, since they willingly fucked up their numbers they cancel all the ballot votes from counties that cant materialize those votes. There you go, you don't reward people for breaking the law

5
Tobin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Realistically if we know the rough number of ballots that showed up late in PA, since they would all be coming from the mail in pool anyway it would still break in our favor most likely.

52
Ballind 52 points ago +53 / -1

Pa needs to have a full revote because the chain of custody was broken when Republicans were removed from the election centers

52
WhiteTrashJesus 52 points ago +55 / -3

Revote isn’t fair. Just void all the absentees

65
Scotty1954 65 points ago +65 / -0

Voiding ALL the absentees is exactly what PENNSYLVANIA law says to do per Alito;)

19
WhiteTrashJesus 19 points ago +21 / -2

Well he said to separate them but yeah either void them or if its possible to accurately audit them

22
Bluestorm83 22 points ago +27 / -5

Revote is the most fair. In person, with ID. Every single PA Citizen will be allowed to vote and vote once. Everything fake will be precluded. Have the National Guard or other servicemen do the count, overseen by observers from both parties. Everything on the up and up.

11
VetforTrump2 11 points ago +11 / -0

Revote is not fair. Trump already won. It is fairer to just give him the state as cheating is occurring Nd only occurs when the otherside is losing. They admit they lost and conceded the minute they cheated

7
WhiteTrashJesus 7 points ago +9 / -2

Ok so how do they get the word out and make it happen soon enough?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
ColoradoTrumper45 5 points ago +5 / -0

A revote might scratch your notion of fair, but it is not included in the Constitution as a considered remedy, and for good reason.

The point of having elections is to best ascertain the will of the people. If the ballots of a jurisdiction are shown to be tainted by fraud, or destroyed, damaged, or compromised in such a way that the clear signal of that will is lost, then the procedure is to effectively revert to a previous save state.

That is, to place the selection of presidential electors into the hands of the seated legislature membership. Thus the broad will of the people of the State is still knowable via their representatives.

This solution avoids the attendant risk of holding a do over in a compromised jurisdiction.

2
commies0ride0free 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now do this for every election ever. I’m in

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
12
DonJr2024 12 points ago +12 / -0

Void absentees or simply cancel all of Philly's votes.

30
Frick_The_Dems2020 [S] 30 points ago +30 / -0

I think this will be a catalyst for getting votes tossed out. The fact that Republicans were prevented from watching the counting is illegal and those votes will probably be tossed out.

26
540k-Again 26 points ago +26 / -0

[Redpill]: Ballot chain of custody is broken when ballots leave the polls (aka mail, absentee, etc.)

Redpill: Redo elections can occur for non-Potus contests; bc there is no such thing allowed in the US Constitution for POTUS/VP, bc the Electoral College wisdom of the Founders whom knew this kind of cheating would occur. It's the State's legislatures who decide Electors. Which is why all these fraud totals only matter for non-Potus/VP. DJT/Pence already won 270+ Electors.

24
betweenthelines_mn 24 points ago +25 / -1

revote is NOT fair. Toss the whole state, arrest all the Philadelphia election workers that were left after the Republican poll watchers were thrown out. 1 year in jail for the worker bees, and 10-15 years for the supervisors. Until we get serious about following voter law the cheaters will cheat.

20
MemeSoldier 20 points ago +20 / -0

Not sure how that would play out right now. Many trump voters don't have td.win and might be feeling demoralized right now. There is NOTHING coming out of the MSM that gives any sign of hope.

Actually, a new election, a possibility of a second-chance would get everyone excited again. I'm already sick of Biden's rhetoric. Textbook establishment puppet politician

9
MuhSoy 9 points ago +9 / -0

A new election would be the best damned thing ever.

8
VetforTrump2 8 points ago +9 / -1

We do not vote twice period. The state is trumps and everyone knows it period. Give it to him or meet us behind the school at 3pm and we will fight it.out. period. We won and they can have it if they beat us at war. This way, either them or us will have it all with out the nuisance of the other being around after. I'm willing g to cast it all in and finish them or us for good.

4
anon1011101 4 points ago +4 / -0

The way I see it, the burden of proof is on Biden to prove he won the election fairly.

37
GenerallyRight 37 points ago +37 / -0

Especially when PA already defied the first court order! That ought to be punishable in itself and cause all questionable ballots to be tossed. Otherwise it disenfranchises the legitimate vote. You know?? The legitimate vote?? Remember us, SCOTUS???

25
MemeSoldier 25 points ago +25 / -0

That's the thing, what's the punishment when you ignore a SCOTUS ruling? Hopefully SCOTUS finds a way to resolve this

10
HatnNewLognReqs 10 points ago +10 / -0

Thats exactly what I want to know... what good is a scotus ruling without the muscle to back it up

4
ScreamingEagles 4 points ago +4 / -0

Where are the U.S. Marshals? They are the enforcement arm of the Federal Judiciary. They can arrest them all.

Throw out all Philly votes. You can't cheat and get a do over. NO REVOTES! You forfeit ALL votes for that jurisdiction, Democrat and Republican.

9
SirDonaldJTrump 9 points ago +9 / -0

There are contempt of court laws, but they are small fines and jail terms.

PA didnt jut ignore SCOTUS by the looks of it, they also ignored orders of PA supreme court to allow wGOP watchers in

However, PA SOS will claim they did no such thing, and they didnt ignore SCOTUS.

They have fraudulently separated both in person and mail in votes that came in after 3rd, but have switch the boxes. So now a lot of in person votes are labelled arrived after 3rd. If those late ballots are disqualified, the pro Trump in person ones will be disqualified

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
ClarenceBeeks 4 points ago +4 / -0

Then the whole vote is out. State legislature decides

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
15
deleted 15 points ago +16 / -1
9
Rreidy8286 9 points ago +9 / -0

Exaclty what ive been saying. Noones watching them so whos to say where they put the shit. They obviously think the american ppl are to spineless to demand action. If the supreme court doesnt do it the ppl will.

76
coinneach007 76 points ago +77 / -1

The Dems were prepared to cheat to manufacture a 2-3% swing in fraudulent votes. The President Trump voters provided a 5% margin that they panicked and had to blatantly cheat to make up. This should be an easy win to prove the fraud.

Now we need to go nuclear and prosecute ALL the fraudsters to the FULLEST EXTENT of the LAW.

37
deplorable-sc 37 points ago +37 / -0

The Democrats believed their own narrative, that DJT is not a popular president. Their polls were manufactured to reinforce this perception and the media is the echo chamber. The Democrats were prepared for small scale voter fraud in Mi, Wi, Pa Az and Nv to deliver a Biden win. I believe NC and Ga were Plan B. The Democrats were NOT prepared for a Red Wave, they never believed it; they believe their own lies. The large turnouts on election day for DJT has forced them to continue manufacturing ballots in quantities that look reasonable between the candidates. Remember, this was supposed to be over by Wednesday. Instead, Democrats had to dump hundreds of thousands of fake ballots in quantities of 100% Biden to keep up with actual votes for DJT. Hang in there!

18
Raposa 18 points ago +18 / -0

I was sad that even when this is all over and Trump is in office, we could never know the true popular vote count, but it sounds like we have at least a close estimate of how far ahead Trump would’ve been (depending on how many ballots for him were trashed or burned).

8
RallyinStJohnsWood 8 points ago +8 / -0

How many votes were flipped digitally might be unknowable.

Add that in.

7
Mrwrn2010 7 points ago +7 / -0

Every state/county that uses Dominion machines should recount/audit by hand. Wouldn't that clearly show the flips? Are there logs on those machines is the question

3
ClarenceBeeks 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep they believed their own suppression polls

3
donkeebs 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's kinda surprising how close ALL of the swing states are. As of the Google right now (to prove my point by using a biased source), Biden's leads in the swing states are:

GA - 10k (16 EC votes) WI - 20k (10 EC) AZ - 20k (11 EC) PA - 41k (20)

That 90k vote difference, plus finally calling AK and NC, would push Trump to 289 electoral college votes. That's a 57 EC vote swing

28
BSnatch 28 points ago +28 / -0

Ya, what were the final numbers on the popular vote? President DJT killed it by 1/2 million but they are saying pedo jo got 7 million more votes than obama did? Obviously does not add up

21
DonJr2024 21 points ago +21 / -0

I believe strongly that the Dominion software flipped millions of votes over to Biden away from Trump. There is no way Trump got the highest non-white vote for a Republican in 50 years (or however long it is) and on top of that, we had the highest turnout ever by far and he "only" beat Obama's total by half a million votes. No way.

17
BSnatch 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yes. In PA alone, the president was up by 700 THOUSAND VOTES. Thats almost 3/4 of a million just from one state. Add detroit and milwaukee in and you are easily at over one million fraudulent votes that went to pedo jo

13
SirDonaldJTrump 13 points ago +13 / -0

Philly up by 700k? I believe Trump was up by 790k in the whole of Pennsylvania at one point before the mid night shenanigans, not in philly alone

26
540k-Again 26 points ago +26 / -0

No the Dems cheated in 2018 by 15-20% in CA. So that's how the Dems stole every House Seat that touches the Pacific Ocean, including Republican Orange County. If a district wasn't +20% Republican it was stolen with post election ballot harvesting (law put in by the stolen CA legislature by the commies).

Places with postmark nonsense, cheated way way more than 2-3%. The voting machines alone do 3% +/- cheating easy.

This Republican Landslide is what caused Dems to have to put up those bogus Expand the Total Vote numbers to whatever size was required to get ahead. Either way, Dems lost bigtime, their cheating is not going to be ignored like 2018 (or all the years before too).

12
ClarenceBeeks 12 points ago +12 / -0

CA 2018 should have been a national scandal and investigated

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
8
MaxineWaters4Prez 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes! Otherwise this will happen again and again.

26
DOTR_KAG 26 points ago +27 / -1

Agree. They tossed legitimate votes, sharpiegate, provisional ballots at the polls when people brought their absentee ballots to drop off, etc. They suppressed the physical vote PLUS hammer and scorecard which would be a 6pt swing TO TRUMP. I bet he received closer to 80 million REAL, LEGAL votes. They cannot rig this election without destroying themselves. And they just couldn’t stop themselves because the lie they have been telling is so big they had to go all in or they were done anyway. They could have slithered away and fought 4 years from now, but they were so sure we would roll and now they have exposed what Biden let out of the bag - largest voter fraud organization in the country. And now the voting process will be cleaned up and they will never win another election - anywhere. Not in CA, MA anywhere. Because they have been holding us under their thumb for decades as Guliani stated yesterday about Philly. Game is not just on, it has already been won.

8
MuhSoy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Careful, Chris Krebs of CISA has declared the Hammer & Scorecard thing to be total BS.

He’s suspicious, but then again nothing came of “muh watermark”.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
ClarenceBeeks 4 points ago +4 / -0

We don’t need either of those 2 things to be proven to win

26
deleted 26 points ago +29 / -3
18
Wishiwastrumpswife 18 points ago +21 / -3

Rumor has it the national guard is there to supervise. They’re keeping everything quiet right now, Trump doesn’t want the enemy to know his next move. He’s the chess master.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
66
IvIA6A 66 points ago +66 / -0

That's why they're rushing to declare Biden the winner. The longer it's in the public's perception that Biden won (he didn't), the harder it will be for Roberts to resist his leftist cuckery.

29
TampaMAGA 29 points ago +30 / -1

But we don’t need Roberts now. Thank god.

16
-FredBear- 16 points ago +16 / -0

As long as ACB gets involved. If she doesn't it could be a toss up.

32
TampaMAGA 32 points ago +32 / -0

ACB said the reason she recused herself from the PA ruling is because she wasn’t a justice when the case started. She WAS a Supreme Court justice when the election started though!

7
HatnNewLognReqs 7 points ago +7 / -0

what? When did the case start?!

6
TampaMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

It hasn’t. I’m talking about her getting involved with the SC decision to allow PA an extension receiving ballots

12
TrumPanda 12 points ago +15 / -3

he might pressure ACB to recuse tho the fucking cuck

14
VA_MAGApede 14 points ago +14 / -0

What is the United States Constitutional precedent for a seated Justice of the United States Supreme Court to recuse?

11
TrumPanda 11 points ago +11 / -0

IDK but iirc acb said in hearingwhen asked if she would recuse on election dispute that she would consult with her 'colleagues' which includes chief cuck roberts

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
8
fapoo 8 points ago +9 / -1

but wasn't roberts involved in 2000 bush gore debacle?

It might be a 6-3 decision

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
10
TrumPanda 10 points ago +10 / -0

It might, but it all depends on how strong a case we present and the evidence.. if the case is weak, even thomas may have a hard time justifying a win for us

If its strong and compelling, even cuck roberts will side with us

4
Friar_Pede 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOL

9
WhiteTrashJesus 9 points ago +10 / -1

Theyre gonna be super pissed and imply the will burn down the judges’ houses, thats my only concern

11
SirDonaldJTrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

Judges dont live in Chicago lmao...Judges especially SCOTUS rule on controversial issues involving rich, powerful people and Im pretty sure they are well protected , otherwise every thug will be trying to kill judges for sentencing them

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
basedBlumpkin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Supreme Court Justices have protection details

1
WhiteTrashJesus 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's true, and hopefully if they kick it back to the state legislatures those people will also be protected

3
IvIA6A 3 points ago +4 / -1

You do if he drags Kavanaugh left. They were the ones that declined to take up the case to begin with, before the election. Now we have a massive problem.

7
SirDonaldJTrump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not Kavanaugh, only Roberts and the other bunch of leftists on the bench. It was 4-4.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
14
Vests123 14 points ago +14 / -0

Also getting the world leaders to come out and congratulate Biden is providing another angle to their illusion that creepy won. I'm wondering if many received phone calls advising them to come out with their congratulations?

57
VoltronGreen1981 57 points ago +57 / -0

They didn't have to contend with how widespread and accessible digital communication is now. Which is what is going to make their pathetic charade fall apart rapidly.

28
Dereliction 28 points ago +28 / -0

Or how defiant we'd be to their fraud.

17
MuhSoy 17 points ago +17 / -0

Just had to tell the missus this. She was discouraged that all the corporations were calling it and her stupid work friends were gloating.

I said in 2000 all people really had was newspaper. Now we’ve got Tweets, memes, and video: EVERYONE can be a journalist.

10
Dereliction 10 points ago +10 / -0

Better tell the missus to make preparations. Could be dangerous when all that gloating turns to salt.

12
MuhSoy 12 points ago +12 / -0

She was told just days ago by a co-worker: “I’d rather have a man accused of child groping than a known racist!”

YASSS KWEEN SLAY bc we all know thoughtcrime is way worse than victimizing kids.

8
Italians_Invented_2A 8 points ago +9 / -1

It's so fucked up that people are so terrified by the word "racist". What is a racist anyway? Someone who doesn't like other races?

Who gives a shit? Only in peak clown world could a racist be put in the same level of social rejection as a pedophile

6
RallyinStJohnsWood 6 points ago +6 / -0

thoughtcrime is way worse than victimizing kids

No, you have it wrong. The defense is not "pedophiles are worse than racists".

It's "Trump's not a racist, nobody called him that until he told Hillary she'd be in jail."

2
Dereliction 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure, but fictitious thought crimes are genocide.

40
Friar_Pede 40 points ago +44 / -4

Gore and Bush were the same candidate.

36
deleted 36 points ago +36 / -0
18
Friar_Pede 18 points ago +24 / -6

Creating the illusion of a difference between the two was the point. But I see what you're saying.

Trump will win

14
doug2 14 points ago +14 / -0

They were certainly different lol. Both members of the order sure but had different views on very critical matters such as the color of the ovals drapery

8
Friar_Pede 8 points ago +8 / -0

Literally tens of billions of lives were at stake.

11
IAmTheSenate 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nah, Gore wouldn't have appointed Alito

13
Friar_Pede 13 points ago +13 / -0

One of Bush's major regrets in his legacy.

10
IAmTheSenate 10 points ago +10 / -0

Kek

He made up for it with Roberts tho. Fuckin cuck

4
FreedomBullets 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's a hot corner of hell waiting for Roberts. May he go there sooner rather than later.

4
Returningtogod 4 points ago +4 / -0

McStain is keeping it warm for him.

3
SirDonaldJTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is there a bunch of anti-conservative decisions that Roberts has given? I read some of his recent judgements, they seem to tow a constitutional line and not exactly biased, but I dont know all of his judgements. But based on the recent ones, if the constitution has something written down, he has tried to hold that line.

7
IAmTheSenate 7 points ago +7 / -0

Oh God where to start?

Biggest fuckup was Obamacare. NIFB v. burwell

Bostock v. Clayton County comes to mind

Among others

3
Italians_Invented_2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

Roberts is a traitor. To not completely blow his cover, he rules with the Demonrats only when he's the swing vote.

There was one instance, the Louisiana abortion case on hospital admission privileges I think, that Roberts voted with the Democrats...in spite of he himself having voted conservative on a very similar issue before. But the first time he didn't matter, the second he did, so he flipped

38
Tellsyouhow 38 points ago +38 / -0 (edited)

The sad thing is that all states were affected if dodgy voting machines were deployed there. Trump gets more votes in history yet sleepy Biden gets more? Even if most were anti Trump votes there's no way those popular vote figures are accurate.

21
doug2 21 points ago +21 / -0

I don't think this is our strongest case. Mass mail in ballots made this a gaurenteed record turnout. It's about the statistical anomalies in only the counties that shut down for no reason at 4 am lol.

2
wampdog29 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. I keep thinking about that as well. The mail-in voting allowed for A LOT more voters. I still think there's fraud there, but really no way to prove it.

46
Moltar 46 points ago +46 / -0

What will Monday bring?

77
Deadpool 77 points ago +77 / -0 (edited)

Monday will bring a “surprise” dry fisting up the rear of all media and tin foil hat liberals. I foresee that by weeks end they will be as raw as Barry after Big Mike gets done with him. The levels of salt will be so glorious, that maybe then I will be close to being tired of all the winning. 🤣👌

29
KingMoonRacer 29 points ago +31 / -2

I agree. POTUS is generally very good at concealing his hand but also loathe to do so when it affects the market.

Unfortunate wildcard is law enforcement— which throughout this presidency done zero that would impact any establishment politicians.

And that has me worried.

25
Deadpool 25 points ago +25 / -0

The media, your neighbors, family, friends all need to see HOW many of us there are. That’s what Trump needs from us. Law enforcement has been pussies dealing with crowds. So show them a real crowd. We aren’t granola eating vegans and we aren’t looting hood rats with pants around our ankles. Good law enforcement is on our side. Our problem has been with “upper management” in law enforcement. Scare them with our size and commitment to PDJT

27
BSnatch 27 points ago +27 / -0

Yep. This election has shown that we are actually the majority. I have no doubt we won the popular vote and electoral college

15
TarHeelMAGA 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yep! That’s why we need mass rallies! People need to have a few days notice, though. If we show out in the millions, across the country, it will open a lot of these retards on the left’s eyes! I have NO DOUBT NOW that we are the majority and took the election, including the popular vote! Now is not a time to be scared.....we need to get out and make ourselves visible! Mass rallies need to be held!

-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
6
K-Harbour 6 points ago +6 / -0

DJT is giving media billions in fresh advertising revenue over an extended period of time......they will milk the changing fortunes of Biden for all it is worth.

The last thing the media wants is for this to be over.

11
MaxineWaters4Prez 11 points ago +11 / -0

I ain't no ways tired of winning.

49
xzibit_b 49 points ago +49 / -0

Rudy Giuliani said they will file the federal lawsuits on Monday

43
ShillsBTFO 43 points ago +43 / -0

Hopefully and finally, some action.

36
jarvis 36 points ago +36 / -0

The markets are going to nose dive.

There's a reason they waited until Saturday to announce this bullshit.

26
Pedeville 26 points ago +26 / -0

good time to buy stock then since after trump is confirmed it will rise as fast as Biden’s vote count when he’s not leading

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
12
MuhSoy 12 points ago +12 / -0

I don’t care about their claims anymore, and I’m sure you don’t either. They want to put us on re-education lists.

11
MaxineWaters4Prez 11 points ago +11 / -0

Isn't it funny how when people put their money on the line, they know Trump is the real deal and democrats are going to ruin everything.

All the social media morons don't mean shit, there's nothing spent and nothing to lose.

6
Burrito_Bandito 6 points ago +6 / -0

time for another v shapw recovery then

6
-FredBear- 6 points ago +6 / -0

If they do take a nosedive it's a pretty telling factor that people do not believe that Biden won, or at the very least they do not trust this election.

10
FuckCommies 10 points ago +10 / -0

The Chinese markets crashed hard around 2 am when we went to bed with a commanding lead. When they started the fraud three hours later they skyrocketed. Think about that.

3
Italians_Invented_2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately not...if it's a contested election the markets will go down simply because they know there won't be a smooth transition of power.

But who gives a shit about the market: we're talking about the future of the United States and the future of the entire world.

16
StrangeLilFella 16 points ago +16 / -0

A goddamn fire podcast from Bongino. I got the feeling from his Friday show that he's contemplating telling Fox to fuck off after that awful AZ call, now they called the election...

Even Jesse Watters is going off on Parler.

1
CommieCucker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any links? I'm not on Parler

12
MemeSoldier 12 points ago +12 / -0

Best on the subject I've seen

7
MAGAsoyboyslayer 7 points ago +8 / -1

There could be multiple angles here. Watermarks might just be counter intel to throw us off like the fake links to submit voter fraud is. I heard alot of spamming calling the voter fraud hotline.

This democrat machine is pure evil and has rigged elections since the 1800's.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
MAGAsoyboyslayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe or maybe not. Only time will tell. Hope he is right.

5
Gumnut 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think I’m aging more quickly

285
SaintPablo 285 points ago +286 / -1

This article outlines what many simpletons are missing: Trump IS going to win in court. Biden’s “lead” is a mirage—and will be dismantled one fraudulent ballot at a time.

191
perfectnugget 191 points ago +192 / -1

Rule #1 of the Dems - they accuse you of what they’re doing. The red mirage is actually blue.

84
Grilledpepe 84 points ago +84 / -0

I was legit sad that a lot of my liberal friends and family were given so much false hope yesterday. But then I remembered how passive aggresive to me they've been since march.....they'll get over it

58
ScreamingEagles 58 points ago +58 / -0

I've been getting nothing but flack and anger from my family and people that I know that don't like Trump for the last 5 years.

They deserve NO sympathy at all. They want us dead, and would laugh at it too.

It will be glorious to laugh in their faces when itn all comes calling down on them.

3
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 3 points ago +6 / -3

They may not deserve sympathy, but you should give it none the less. Jesus teaches us to love everyone, even your enemies, you can at least be gracious towards your family regardless if they were gracious to you when the roles were reversed.

9
ChadRight92 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)

when Trump wins it in the courts this is going to be bad. Media will be saying "Tyrant trump steals election" Riots will go out all over the place, much much worse than the BLM riots.

8
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 8 points ago +8 / -0

Then Trump is forced to use the Insurrection Act and really looks like a tyrant. These aren't dumb people we are up against.

4
ScreamingEagles 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good. We can finally take out the trash without being held up by "muh election optics".

5
Trumpeteer 5 points ago +5 / -0

They may not deserve sympathy, but you should give it none the less. Jesus teaches us to love everyone

I’m a Godless pede, so no. No sympathies here for the people that wish to make my life a living hell simply because I have a different opinion than them. Many of us are Agnostic/Atheist; the left would accept that with open arms since they are stringently against Christianity, but no sane person could follow their ideology.

3
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 3 points ago +5 / -2

but no sane person could follow their ideology.

And yet, here you are following their example. Take God out of it then, I am just suggesting you be better than them. To each their own though, do what you want, be whatever type of person you want to be.

1
SWORDofLIBERTY 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cuckservatives don't understand when revenge needs to be properly applied, even tho Trump clearly does understand. Christianity let them become soft and turn the other cheek to constant offenses until we reached this point of no return. Don't give your enemies a lick of sympathy, for they would give you none.

3
MasterOfIllusions 3 points ago +3 / -0

They should never be allowed to forget.

2
ScreamingEagles 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll be good to my close family, but everyone else gets absolutely NO sympathy.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
7
pmurTJdlanoD 7 points ago +7 / -0

Oh cool it’ll be like a rerun of this summer

4
NegativeRainbow 4 points ago +4 / -0

If DJT pulls it out in the end they will literally start burning down cities enmasse.

I just hope their aim is as bad as their integrity... I don't want an innocent person to get crushed under the weight of a landwhale that took the elevator to the top (since they couldn't take the stairs.) and jumped off... Kinda feel sorry for the city workers... All those craters in the roads and sidewalks... I guess it will help the economy paying the workers to fix those holes...

2
Julia_J 2 points ago +2 / -0

😂😂😂😂

4
ScreamingEagles 4 points ago +4 / -0

They will literally be jumping off of rooftops.

Good. Less Democrats.

3
MAGA_4EVER 3 points ago +3 / -0

The utter embarrassment they'll feel will be enough

95
VoltronGreen1981 95 points ago +95 / -0

In reality I wouldn't be surprised if Trump was 80+ million in total votes when everything is accounted for.

77
deleted 77 points ago +77 / -0
38
VoltronGreen1981 38 points ago +38 / -0

It's amazing how Keith went from being just some dude on ESPN that you didn't care one way another about, to being some bat-shit loon trying to be a political analyst.

23
Fffffffff 23 points ago +23 / -0

He was a loon on ESPN too

19
CSI_Tulsa 19 points ago +19 / -0

You forget. Olbermann was a very reasonable political analyst who was against the Iraq war. He was calling out the neo-cons constantly.

Something happened. They compromised him somehow.

Not the first time someone has done a 180 without an obvious reason.

15
SanFranShitty 15 points ago +15 / -0

He probably took some visits to Epstein Island

9
YUNG_GUAC 9 points ago +9 / -0

Just another pawn on the pedo-"elite" chessboard. He's no different than Intern Bludgeonin' Morning Joe.

3
Gumnut 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saw username, thought ‘Jobeast’

4
VoltronGreen1981 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nothing a MAGA Blazing Sword can't handle.

26
bck- 26 points ago +26 / -0

Trump had a higher approval rating than Reagan within the Republican Party going into this election. It was supposed to be a landslide victory. If there was no cheating, it would have been. He would have won OH, FL, WI, MI, PA, NV, AZ, and GA. It was a lock. But the Democrats cheated so egregiously.

16
YUNG_GUAC 16 points ago +16 / -0

He deserves to have this recognition as well. They're trying to smear his legacy on top of everything else.

18
Returningtogod 18 points ago +18 / -0

If I were GEOTUS, I wouldn't stop with peeling off just enough of sleepy's votes to win. I'd go all in until the truth emerges - that he won all 50 states.

8
Trumpeteer 8 points ago +8 / -0

Trump had an insane amount of support in California, too. The massive public-led rallies through the streets, tens of thousands #WalkingAway from the left as well. I would go so far as to bet it may have been possible for him to win CA if the voting process wasn’t fraudulent.

5
MAGA_4EVER 5 points ago +5 / -0

Punch back 10 times harder

1
HaleyNunes2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

As much as anything else, they're sending a message to any other political outsiders who might get uppity and run for office in future elections.

4
Trumpeteer 4 points ago +4 / -0

he gets to finish his term until Jan 20, 2021, and any attempt to stop that is treason and a coup.

Massive crowds outside the White House were cheering “BURN IT DOWN” last night. We’re at borderline coup, by the public, our neighbors, the propagandist media, an entire political party and movement of hatred, the FBI, and nearly half the country’s governors/senators encouraging it.

2
RallyinStJohnsWood 2 points ago +2 / -0

treason sedition

49
Red-in-Tooth 49 points ago +49 / -0

They are trying to pawn off Biden as more popular than Trump. Sure, maybe, people could believe that. But more popular than Clinton? More popular than Obama?

I think that is part of what is unsettling to the normies. Something just doesn't feel right about this to them and while they have no real idea why, its little inconsistencies like this that eat away at them. For us it is obvious though, there is no way he was more popular than any of those three. The Democrats and Far Left alike were bemoaning what a trash ballot they were running this time.

30
VoltronGreen1981 30 points ago +30 / -0

Which is laughable because before the Dem primary was over, he was getting overshadowed by Bernie, so of course they had to rig their own primaries just to get Biden in. He's not even popular among his own party.

I wouldn't be surprised if literally millions of votes for Biden are completely bogus.

The news narrative is literally an alternate reality that completely clashes with our five senses. Everyone saw Biden getting no support at rallies, no traffic to any of his lame basement broadcasts, etc. There's not a single Democrat voter out there that can explain what his platform actually was. All he did was talk out both sides of his mouth and not commit to a single thing, other than extended lockdowns, which I guarantee even most Democrats don't want.

1
trump2020canadian 1 point ago +1 / -0

he's a scapegoat, that's why. Because they know he can take the fall. He does not have much left in him anyways, the Democrats just use people

20
NewUser101 20 points ago +20 / -0

It's worse than that, because it isn't uniform.

If the minorities had gone hard everywhere for Biden, FL/OH looked like these supposed swing States where the fix was in, this might be believable. But no, Biden performed way worse than Hillary/Obama among minorities and in urban centers - except in these few States who paused counting and started trucking in fixed ballots and statistical impossibilities abound.

If Trump got blown the fuck out, it would not look like this. This is massively fraud, period; Biden taking office would be the death of the Republic.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
18
SanFranShitty 18 points ago +18 / -0

I live in San Francisco and people were complaining about the Biden ticket. No energy. No excitement. No enthusiasm.

And then after hiding in his basement all year and dozens of people showing up for him when he steps outside, he blows out Clinton and Obama. NOT!

6
radiant_lotus33 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah here in the South Bay no one was really behind them, just making jokes about how senile Biden is

10
Sdhoppy71 10 points ago +10 / -0

That is the only thing about this farce that makes me happy. The thought of Obama and Hillary's reactions when they heard Biden (allegedly) got more votes than them. You know Hillary threw empty wine bottles at the tv and Obama was crying while sucking off Big Mike that night

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
49
sodacan 49 points ago +49 / -0

Yet again, 'they' (democrats, media) have created the aura of a 'stolen' election on our side. They have once again corrupted DJT's victory so that they can spend the next 4 years complaining and trying to impeach again. No matter the evidence that the campaign gets everyone in the media will ignore it and gaslight the common man who doesn't spend hours looking into it. THIS is the purpose of pushing biden right now, this is why they are deleting all their election night coverage. The evil they are doing HAS to be punished, we simply cannot allow this to go on and move ahead.

17
RagnarDannes 17 points ago +17 / -0

Doesn’t really matter in the second term since he won’t be on the ballot again

10
bck- 10 points ago +10 / -0

Unless...

9
YUNG_GUAC 9 points ago +9 / -0

Be careful!

32
NotJudging 32 points ago +32 / -0

The truth is on our side. But history shows the truth is meaningless without just men. The truth showed Hillary should have gone to prison, but the men in place did nothing. The truth showed Biden to be a 2 ton crook, and now it depends on the people that have let General Flynn get railroaded for 4 years to see if Biden will be our next false president.

7
iamherefortheluls 7 points ago +7 / -0

history also shows that our courts have this habit of concluding that elections were blatantly unfair... but than allowing the unfair results to stand. See SCC decisions on 2000 election, and Al Franken 2010 Senate elections.

Both were concluded to be decidedly fraudulent. But then the courts did NOTHING.

21
RumorControl 21 points ago +21 / -0

So like a “blue mirage”?

16
deleted 16 points ago +17 / -1
11
wethepepe 11 points ago +11 / -0

the left always projects

126
InterestingIke 126 points ago +127 / -1

The numbers are undeniable, but this is fun too, and honestly spookily verifiable. https://twitter.com/tom2badcat/status/1325124397729001472?s=21 https://pascrell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4515 Bored and looked into the possibility of this after seeing that tweet. Just interesting

96
The5thEstate 96 points ago +96 / -0

Good thread, just a side note:

I don't like the "trust the plan" narrative. It is a nice way of saying "no need to act, others will act for you." We need every Pede, shitposter, KEKster, anti-Woke, and anyone else to canvass for evidence -- voter rolls data, machine used, postal workers' daily route (maybe you can find dumped ballots along the route, or find a facility with a large bin, and trace where those bins are being dumped).

29
GretaCornburg 29 points ago +29 / -0

Send money prayers and weaponized autism to the president. If you’re not an autist then spread the info to people who are otherwise gaslit

12
YUNG_GUAC 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes this--donate to the President's legal defense fund. His team is fighting in several states and they need our help at this critical moment.

2
HaleyNunes2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. If Lindsey Graham can do it, then so can every single pede.

13
p8riot 13 points ago +14 / -1

How did this become a thing? Trust in God / the plan, does NOT mean do not act. All the patriots rallying at state capitols, they trust the plan.

"Trust the plan" means we saw their attack coming, tally ho and hold the line!!

3
deleted 3 points ago +6 / -3 (edited)
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
7
wethepepe 7 points ago +7 / -0

I agree with this 100%

Sure, we all hope it's true. But don't bank on it. Do the hard work and if we're lucky, then great, we're even better off but if not we're just as prepared

5
deleted 5 points ago +8 / -3
7
SomaticallySpeaking 7 points ago +7 / -0

How can he put anything 'forth' that isn't just soiled depends?

Be gone, Sleepy Joe; you have no power here.

2
emperors_apprentice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden knows how to sign his own name. That's really all the ones that installed him need to accomplish their fuckery.

Have you not seen that list of day-one executive orders?

1
SomaticallySpeaking 1 point ago +1 / -0

'Day one' is a loooooooong ways away.

1
SomaticallySpeaking 1 point ago +1 / -0

I meant now; 'day one' is still a long ways away, especially for traitors.

38
SurrenderFreeman 38 points ago +38 / -0

So the sting isn't the watermark..... it's something completely different but equally terrible

31
InterestingIke 31 points ago +31 / -0

I mean we’re seeing real Trump operatives feed into this, so who knows. Crazy tho

23
Pedeville 23 points ago +24 / -1

Well, the part about blockchain technology being used seems accurate

6
p8riot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is there a sauce to corroborate the one guy on the video saying it?

7
Pedeville 7 points ago +7 / -0

Chainlink is partnered with the US government, Trump creates CISA to secure election integrity (headed by Giullani)

dots are there ready to be connected

4
SameCookiePseudonym 4 points ago +4 / -0

No it doesn’t. It sounds stupidly retarded if you know anything about computers.

And btw here is the head of CISA explicitly saying the watermark BS is false: https://twitter.com/cisakrebs/status/1324799793709928449?s=21

2
OyVeyBot 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes, the guy pushing the watermark bs, Steve Pieczenik, is a disinfo agent for the Deep State (and Zionist Jew)

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
Pedeville 2 points ago +2 / -0

Except that Chainlink partnered with US governemnt. Just because they didnt watermark doesnt mean they didnt use the blockchain technology

0
SameCookiePseudonym 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm a computer scientist, and I promise you this is nothing but retarded Q bullshit

1
Pedeville 1 point ago +1 / -0

okay but you can just google ‘chainlink partners with US government’ and see evidence for yourself

-1
deleted -1 points ago +0 / -1
0
SameCookiePseudonym 0 points ago +2 / -2

yes? If "muh blockchain" and "muh watermarks" were true, they would have evidence and that's exactly what I would expect them to say. And Rudy wouldn't be filing suit about "we can't watch the ballots" if they had anything even close to hard evidence of systemic fraud.

People here are starting to sound like "here's how bernie can still win," it's embarassing. I don't blame Trump for not conceding, but if he doesn't have actual evidence of SYSTEMIC, industrial-scale fraud, this is going nowhere and you're just coping.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
kingkongdong 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wouldn't be surprised if trump setup 10 different ways to get them. The watermark is just one of those ways.

30
gromenawer 30 points ago +30 / -0

This will be such an encore to 2020.

  • All libtards superextra-salty because election result flipped back to Trump.

  • A decent load of dems to jail borderlining death penalty for treason.

  • All the social media and news organization held accountable for facilitating election fraud.

This is hardcore erotic fantasy at this point.

11
p8riot 11 points ago +11 / -0

There's going to be a name for these trials like the Nuremberg.. 2020 is the most epic year ever

3
RallyinStJohnsWood 3 points ago +3 / -0

treason. sedition (look it up)

1
emperors_apprentice 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

#1 for sure, but I'm going to press x to doubt on the other 2.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
Burrito_Bandito 13 points ago +13 / -0

idk if its watermarks or soemthing else but theres simply no way Trump and his team sat by and DIDNT monitor for fraud.

they absolutely had something planned

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
114
thefeebleguy 114 points ago +114 / -0

Lol I've had democrats tell me that President Trump has no chance to get to Supreme Court and was called a "Sore Loser". I can't wait for the salt show

70
deleted 70 points ago +70 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
MAGA_4EVER 5 points ago +5 / -0

Right? Most don't even take a second to look into our laws

51
540k-Again 51 points ago +52 / -1

democrats tell me that President Trump has no chance to get to Supreme Court

For anyone who wants to win, this was all worked out decades ago:

  • According to the US Constitution, Who votes for President/VP? (Electors is the correct answer-Article 2.)

  • According to the US Constitution, Who selects the Electors? (States' Legislatures is the correct answer-Article 2)

  • According to the US Constitution, Who can select the time(frame) when States' Legislatures can select Electors? (Correct answer is congress-Article 2.)

  • Did congress set this-- the Time as Election Day, the first Tuesday after the first Monday (aka Nov 3, 2020 this year)? (Correct answer yes 3 USC1)

  • And who had the most Electors over 270+ by midnight on Election Day? (Correct Answer DJT/Pence)

  • And In 3 USC 2, basically says that States' Legislatures can submit Electors later, if they hold an Election; now if this is unconstitutional, Who decides that? (Correct Answer The SUPREME COURT)

If 3 USC 2 is unconstitutional, DJT/Pence have 270+ Electors.

If 3 USC 2 is ruled legal (by a Roberts Majority), who controls the majority of States' Legislatures worth of Electors in the USA on that Electoral Map? (Correct Answer Republicans do.)

Either way DJT/Pence REPUBLICANS have won over 270+ Electors on Election Day. =

REPUBLICAN LANDSLIDE:

  • DJT/Pence won the majority(270+ Electors) on Election Day.

  • Republicans gained more Senate Seats

  • Republicans gained more House Seats and haven't lost one yet. Realistically, we will take the House majority after the fraud(s) are removed too.

  • Republicans won most Governors contests of the 11 up.

  • Republicans won hundreds of State Legislature Seats

  • Republicans spent far less money doing it.

  • And many other contest wins too.

The Dems lost on every front, except on fraud and committing crimes from money laundering, illegal donations, illegal candidates, etc. which really is losing too.

Put me in coach!

20
fapoo 20 points ago +20 / -0

I can't believe how much I've picked up about US law from TDwin sometimes.

Love it.

17
thefeebleguy 17 points ago +17 / -0

YOU'RE IN

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
16
540k-Again 16 points ago +16 / -0

One reason why 3 USC2 is unconstitutional is bc there are so many shades of grey on how it can be "legal" aka vague law. But here it is:

Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct. (June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 672.)

So if it's legal, it lets State's Legislatures submit their list of Electors after Election Day IF they held an election for the purpose of choosing electors. And every State did this of course. So every State's Legislature can send in late its list of Electors.

But bc the US Constitution says (as sorta tacked onto 3 USC 2)

U.S. Constitution- Art 2. Sect 1 Clause 2 Choosing Electors: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, ..."

that the full and total power of the manner which Electors are appointed is with each State's Legislature. Which means, as written into the Constitution, the "elections" for POTUS/VP on the ballots cannot override the Constitution (ie the ballot totals are basically advisory(not binding) to the State's Legislature's actions.) This is why so many of those fraudulent Biden/Harris ballots only have that bubble filled in bc technically they're NOT breaking most election laws, since unlike all the other elections on the ballot, the POTUS/VP is an advisory vote.

Republicans hold the majority of Electoral College Votes via State Legislatures.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_state_legislatures

So if 3 USC 2 is "legal" State Legislatures can send in their Slate of Electors late since all "held an election for the purpose of choosing electors"

All Pedes should be contacting their State Legislatures if they're Republican; and if not donate to do recounts/etc in all Elections in Dem areas not just POTUS votes (but all the other REAL elections).

BUILD THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!!

5
SirDonaldJTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where is the case to rule 3 USC 2 illegal? Shouldnt it be ruled in Federal court first, and then SCOTUS has to rule on it? There is not enough time.

At best, given the grand scale fuckery with mail in ballots, it can be ruled that those received after the 3rd nov deadline cant be counted. But even this is a LONG shot, and there has been so much tampering that even if this is ruled, it would be a tough task to segregate the ballots. When a mail in ballot is received the envelope is tossed and the ballot is processed. In states like PA just to fuck with the GOP and perpetrate fraud, the GOP watchers were kept out and all the ballots were mixed, heck its even possible they switched in person ballots instead of mail ins.

6
540k-Again 6 points ago +6 / -0

Time critical things can leapfrog fast. And yes time is of the essence. I think most of the right pieces have been put in place; that now is the time to release the Hounds!

Yes, all the issues with ballots of various kinds and handling, all have ways to be dealt with effectively. Mainly "other" elections are more easily cleaned up or redone if required; the POTUS/VP numbers are what throws everything off for most people/lawyers/etc.

I've worked polls & elections & even co-founded a mini-political party (took half the seats first time out!). Born into politics & law. I've found fraud in every human gathered dataset I've ever worked on, including the US Census, climate data, traffic data, election data, etc. I've even won an election against the ballot stuffing commies by less than 5 votes (they physically ran out of printed ballots to stuff, as they locked themselves in a sealed room to count without witnesses allowed; but it meant they couldn't get rid of my ballots or get more delivered either! kek.) I know how these commies cheat, at every level; and it's time to drop the hammer down.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
Backslash2099 4 points ago +4 / -0

Unfortunately the electors don't vote on election day. They vote on December 14th, the Monday after the second Wednesday. 3 U.S.C. §7

3
540k-Again 3 points ago +3 / -0

When the Electors vote themselves doesn't matter, so long as it's the same for all Electors.

(Technically, Like Election Day, these dates can be set by congress at any time; and need not be unconstitutionally hard-codified bc this is the original and still functioning replacement system; ie if need to replace POTUS/VP, congress sets date for States' Legislatures to select Electors and congress sets date for Electors to vote, have sealed&signed States' Elector's tallies brought to the Nation's capital(similar to jury voting); open in front of joint session, tiebreaking, etc. Have new POTUS/VP.)

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
IntrepidBurger 1 point ago +1 / -0

They LOVE that line. "All the experts say he has no chance!" as if they're suddenly Constitutional scholars lol

94
kibbledbits 94 points ago +96 / -2

FoxNews already caved. They caved before the election.

144
Nannerbadnanner 144 points ago +144 / -0

They didn't cave. They have been perpetrators the whole time.

60
deleted 60 points ago +60 / -0
30
Kriegson 30 points ago +30 / -0

Fox has always been offbrand big media and like all offbrand products, it's made by the same company.

29
deleted 29 points ago +29 / -0
7
YUNG_GUAC 7 points ago +7 / -0

No coincidence that Pierre Delecto and low energy jeb! rushed out to give their endorsements and praise. This is a coordinated effort.

23
reclaiming_mycountry 23 points ago +23 / -0

Keked very loudly at this

North Carolina. That one pretty much looks like as though it is over and D.J. won it. Fox News is rumored to call it for Trump around April 2021.

76
deleted 76 points ago +77 / -1
31
MemeSoldier 31 points ago +31 / -0

Is this what Dominion is doing? The "glitch"?

42
JeremiahKassin 42 points ago +42 / -0

You could literally watch the live results and see votes suddenly switching from Trump to Biden in a fraction of a second. That's why they're taking down the election night streams. They don't want us going over them with a fine-toothed comb and seeing this happen over and over.

23
11
HerrBBQ 11 points ago +11 / -0

Make a standalone post so more people see this. This is irrefutable. The fact that the R went down and D went up the EXACT SAME AMOUNT OF VOTES in a SPLIT SECOND seals the deal for me.

8
RedditDotLose 8 points ago +8 / -0

Those pesky glitches!

6
underbudgetwinning10 6 points ago +6 / -0

that is just crazy

2
AlphaNathan 2 points ago +3 / -1

STREAMABLE HAS BEGUN CENSORING TODAY. COPY THIS.

5
MemeSoldier 5 points ago +6 / -1

I was asking about scorecard

10
JeremiahKassin 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's how Scorecard works.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
9
iamherefortheluls 9 points ago +10 / -1

no.

You can tell by the fact that the system had 'glitched' twice now in Michigan alone and Guliani said jack shit about it in his speech yesterday despite Dominion, if found to be fault, could have prompted recounts across half the country.

Again. This is not a sting, because if it was a sting federal agents would have been all over these states on November 4th.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
64
streakybacon 64 points ago +72 / -8

Going hard against the "watermark sting" even though it's not much more than a little theory atm makes me think it's a campaign to stop us from looking into it.

Don't try to deny the rabbit hole. This is all developing and people are searching. Is it credible? Who knows, but it's not aliens landing from mars. It's at the very least a version of something that is true, even if it is not accurately being stated - just like everything we slowly learned about the coup.

50
Isolated_Patriot 50 points ago +54 / -4

People acting like it's a flat earth theory to think the department DJT created specifically for securing elections a year ago might have watermarked some ballots.

31
sbet06 31 points ago +31 / -0

Commom sense especially considering Trump was harping about these mail-in ballots being printed in the millions by foreign interests.

16
SisyphusRockAndRoll 16 points ago +17 / -1

Aren't there digital ballots? I read the 130,000 at 4am were on a harddrive. I mean, it doesn't have to be a literal watermark on every vote, could be some kind of blockchain metadata.

9
JeremiahKassin 9 points ago +9 / -0

There absolutely must be a physical record of these "digital ballots." There's no such thing as an all-electronic vote. If there's no physical ballot, they get tossed out.

8
V2020 8 points ago +9 / -1

That’s not the way. Democrats would have known.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
V2020 2 points ago +3 / -1

That would be good.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
_deleted_ 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is what bothers me, you mention it and you get labeled a conspiracy theorist. I'm not convinced either way, but it's not science fiction to suggest. Furthermore the people wanting to shame you for not instantly knowing it's fake are the same people telling you Q is a larp, but also that there's an ambiguous mystery plan. Coming from....? Where?

Pick a lane... there's either a super secret master plan, or there's not.

If there's not, you're all but admitting you don't really have faith that Trump will pull off the W.

If there is, then that lends at least an iota of credibility or warrants discussion about both Q and/or the watermark theories.

You can't really say there's a super secret plan if you don't know what that plan is, or why you're saying that there is a plan. Unless you just "trust Trump that much", but like it or not we're teetering on the edge of losing. Any mention of that gets met with "get fucked DOOMER!!!" it's tiresome, not everyone is a troll/glowie/whatever word of the week you're using to discredit real worries. We're supposed to 'hold the line' whatever the fuck that means. Apparently it means just chant that Trump won over and over. Which I've done, and do believe he did. But I digress...

Trump had better have a super secret plan. And if he does -how can you say every theory about that plan is fake larps without providing your own? And where are you getting that information?

26
Mixxy 26 points ago +28 / -2

Even if they stop us from looking in to it, what does that accomplish? Either Trump planned it or he didn't. Unlike other leads like Dominion and dead voters, the watermark is something that we can't offer any assistance on. Let's focus on the battles that we can fight with the President, instead of on the ones he may be secretly fighting.

16
streakybacon 16 points ago +19 / -3

No-one's "focused" on it. I just find the specific comments saying not to even consider it a little bit suspicious.

21
Mixxy 21 points ago +23 / -2

A lot of very smart people are devoting a lot of mental energy to trying to uncover it. Those same smart people could be devoting that energy to other leads. Thing is, if Trump wanted it to be a secret, then we're not doing any good by telling the world about it. If anything, I'd say its a psy-op in the other direction. A diversion tactic, if you will.

We're all on the same side here and I'm not accusing anyone here of anything, just offering my opinion on what the best use of our time is.

6
streakybacon 6 points ago +11 / -5

I have unlimited metal energy. I can look into stuff all night and then work all day. I need no one's permission or approval to look into any and every lead that may or may not be credible and I see nothing but hugely disproportionate and out of context concern whenever this story is even mentioned (or not mentioned).

If it's such a nothing story, stop bringing it up.

3
Mixxy 3 points ago +5 / -2

You realize I was replying to the comment where you brought it up, right? I don't understand why you're vilifying me over this, I was just trying to discuss what you said

-1
streakybacon -1 points ago +2 / -3 (edited)

Re: read the title of this post. I'm not talking about you specifically, I'm responding to O.P (and then you, in regards to O.P.)

Edit: lol downvote instead of reading the O.P title. That's where it was "brought up", smart guy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
wethepepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are exactly right

It's reinforcement that would totally turn the odds in our favour but don't sit around waiting to be saved while you're up against the wall. Focus on what we can accomplish and on how we can help

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2 (edited)
3
SomaticallySpeaking 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seb Gorka specifically denied it; but, as I said before, of course he would - now.

1
RallyinStJohnsWood 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does Gorka have to do with it

1
SomaticallySpeaking 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dunno, other than he's closer to any of it than I am. Had two pedes quash the watermark 'rumor' yest per his quote about it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
DarkMemeDuck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Precisely. If Trump set some kind of trap here with watermarks it's impossible for us to know right now. So why bother chasing that lead? If it turns out true, great! We got it in the bag. If not, well, we are already looking for the more complex win via the courts. And from reading this article it sounds like we are pretty close to having that assuming ACB pulls through.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
MaxineWaters4Prez 0 points ago +1 / -1

I like to read many different scenarios.

11
Lanternsign 11 points ago +12 / -1

As someone who knows a bit about blockchains and tech in general, that clip about watermarks sounded like a bunch of nonsense and buzzwords thrown around. To me it seems like a democrat planted idea to discredit rest of the voter fraud theories being discussed.

IMO they planted that story so they can turn around and laugh at us for falling for it. I am not saying don't go down the rabbit hole but i am glad people on the right aren't putting all their eggs in that basket.

Dominion seems to be the smoking gun as well as the statistically impossible turnout numbers. In my opinion we will prevail this coup if we focus on fights that we know we are gonna win: PA voter fraud, MI/GA voting machines, Nevada provisional ballots, and WI fraud

3
emperors_apprentice 3 points ago +3 / -0

THIS. If we were actually using blockchain to secure the election, Trump would already have his landslide, and Biden would be millions of votes behind.

3
ArdentGrasshopper 3 points ago +3 / -0

What do you mean "stop us from looking into it"?

Does anyone here actually have the authority to go check and then he read a negative post and went "oh well, let me drink my beer instead then"?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
ArdentGrasshopper 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have the authority to go scan ballots for watermarks? Because that's what the "sting" is what the dude above was referring to.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ArdentGrasshopper 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, you don't?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
ArdentGrasshopper 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't try to wiggle out by talking about generics. Are you (personally) allowed to go and scan ballots for watermarks?

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
48
SarahCartersPuppies 48 points ago +56 / -8

Feels like hope porn. I don’t trust a god damn thing anymore. Certainly not the courts.

14
CT_MAGA 14 points ago +15 / -1

I like "Hope Porn".

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
2
Thecloudsurfer91 2 points ago +2 / -0

Found the European pede. Lol

12
IvIA6A 12 points ago +12 / -0

I don't expect the courts to grasp any of this.

22
MisterKag 22 points ago +25 / -3

... just like in 2000 when President Gore won.

13
GretaCornburg 13 points ago +13 / -0

...and half of the conservative justices are alumni of that case

1
IvIA6A 1 point ago +3 / -2

Entirely different issue.

We are looking at multiple states with several vote fraud issues, software glitches, process issues and recounts that need to take place, and the court led by Roberts might just say "fuck it this is too big and widespread, too many invalid votes have already been mixed in, we lost chain of custody so the results stand".

12
MisterKag 12 points ago +13 / -1

Several of the current SCOTUS have already telegraphed what they are going to do. The last test run with PA, before ACB, was a 4-4 tie on much closer issues.

You’re just a doomer. Keep the faith. They want you to quit.

7
SomaticallySpeaking 7 points ago +7 / -0

"we" lost the chain of custody?

No, asshats PURPOSEFULLY DESTROYED the chain of custody; PROSECUTE THEM.

1
IvIA6A 1 point ago +3 / -2

Calling me a doomer. Ha

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
9
Natethegreat 9 points ago +10 / -1

dud you read pascrells statement? That just verified that exact tweet.

7
deleted 7 points ago +9 / -2
-10
deleted -10 points ago +1 / -11
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
tiredofwinning2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thank you. I feel like all of these wild theories have been going on for years... yet Hillary Clinton with her emails and the fbi lying and altering emails, so many examples of just blatant law breaking and nothing. Nothing. Ever get accomplished. No one gets punished. We are left empty handed. I don’t trust the system for a fucking second.

24
Pdjco658 24 points ago +24 / -0

that's interesting

21
WeWillRejoice 21 points ago +21 / -0

Will read. Thanks for posting. Anything now under the heading of "good news" is like cocaine to me.

19
Tardigrade 19 points ago +19 / -0

Cmon man are you a junkie?

20
shinzoabe 20 points ago +20 / -0

This is how I plan things to play out. Democrats are doing their early celebrations to convince their voters Trump has stolen the election

15
The5thEstate 15 points ago +15 / -0

I would like to add to the article: not just in Georgia, Nevada, Michigan, and the rest. Run the voter rolls data in all the states -- Kansas, Vermont, West Virginia, Oregon, Hawai'i, New Hampshire. Quite a few House, Senate, and state & local seats were impacted by this fraud. Currently, the Democrats are poised to have a very narrow majority in the House (3 seats). If enough data can be presented that seats were unfairly won, it might swing the House to GOP.

Starting Monday, the Trump Team will be in full gear, let's give them a head start.

13
DJT_JR6544 13 points ago +13 / -0

Great stuff!

13
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
11
DiocletianQ3T 11 points ago +13 / -2

Probably the most level headed outlook. None of this block-chain/watermark ballot bullshit.

10
cpaxirs 10 points ago +10 / -0

Thanks, really upset right now, Scotus please make this right or convince me there was no crime here

4
TDBabyBite 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don’t be, Trumps winning.

0
GretaCornburg 0 points ago +2 / -2

Got bad news for ya on the latter part

10
cornpop30303 10 points ago +10 / -0

God is setting them up for a massive fall! He wants us to see their humiliation on full display. Go ahead and mock them. They have incurred His wrath!

5
axrevolutionai 5 points ago +5 / -0

"The LORD lifteth up the meek: he casteth the wicked down to the ground."

the Psalms were divinely inspired, besides the Gospels one of the closest direct from God's mind to us part of the bible..

any Christian Democrats (if there are actually any) should be on their knees for days praying for forgiveness

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
9
TeachersUnionsSUCK 9 points ago +9 / -0

Good read here boys

8
jamesvien1011 8 points ago +8 / -0

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325272298807439360.html

Urgent all the referals of election fraud to the DOJ will be handles by a deep state swamp dweller involved in the IRs scam

8
OwnaLib87 8 points ago +8 / -0

PSA go out and buy a paper that says Biden Wins. Will be a fun conversation piece in the future.

4
BetsyRossRocks 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do they still sell newspapers?

1
commies0ride0free 1 point ago +1 / -0

USA Today you can get some places I think

8
DrStaunch 8 points ago +9 / -1

The problem with all this is we know that the media will go into overdrive on Monday 'debunking' any and all claims or evidence presented to court and admonishing all claims of fraud of wrongdoing. They will also create the narrative that the nation will flip out if anything other than a Biden win is called.

What needs to happen is a sea of MAGA needs to show up very publicly all over the country with a clear message that this isn't going away and the result will not be accepted unless there is recounts and investigations.

As packed as the Supreme Court is with conservative thinkers, they will avoid any and all interference if they think it's the safest route and route least likely to cause civil unrest. Unless they know pedes are serious about not accepting the result they will cave in.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
6
bobbybadass 6 points ago +6 / -0

Look into CISA's ARLO program. Not only what it does, but what states are involved. Then look or wait for mentions of an 'audit's in that state as have already been announced for GA and PA.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RedFemmeRedemption 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw that too. Very interesting. We may or may not learn more about that in the days ahead.

1
247MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

But if they (the dems) just intercepted ballots that were printed for inactive- dead-moved-ineligible voters, how can we trace that?

So say the state sent bad ballots to my address for someone else. I return it to them saying they don't live there anymore. A dem operative in the return office collect them all and fill them out to hold onto as needed.

This also never catches the millions of dirty leftists that received extra ballots and submitted them in other peoples names, or just duplicates etc. We've seen the list, millions and millions were lost track of. How does this watermark stuff track any of that?

7
Arkful773 7 points ago +7 / -0

Repost — ✅🚨 If you are even REMOTELY considering going into the “Acceptance” Phase of President Biden - DON’T! Here’s why...

If we let this election fraud stand without completely going to the mattresses and fighting tooth and nail, there is literally no reason for any of us to be engaged in or even talk about politics after today. When our opponent can just manufacture votes on demand and BLATANTLY cheat to win elections they would otherwise handily lose, then what’s the point in making any effort whatsoever? Why campaign? Why make contributions? Why try to get into debates with people? Why vote? If we let this stand they will just get better at the cheating and triple down on it so don’t even consider giving up because there’s no next step after that.

If we let this go, then basically it’s like we are playing fantasy football and expecting it to affect the score of the actual game

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
MAGAMAN300 6 points ago +7 / -1

Good read but we already won this on Tuesday night. Every vote received after the deadline set in every single State by law will be ruled illegal and tossed out. Which is why President Trump said on tweeter on NOV 4th so many times stop counting because the US Supreme court is going to make each state follow the own election LAWS because most of these states extended the ballot counting and extended the period on being able accept Ballots with out making a new Law and they can't do that. So in a majorty of States a lot of votes will get tossed. Which will eliimate maybe half of bidens votes. Which in my opinion is why you hear stories of people trying to post mark the ballots at the Post office but they are screwed.

1
PGM92 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why isn't Rudy publicly talking about votes received after election night being invalid? Or the statistical improbabilities in key counties? He seems fixated on the issue of not allowing poll observers to be their job. I guess we'll see what happens.

6
Donald_McRonald 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good article. This is what I have been saying since the 4 am ballot drops. No way Joepedo wins this and my reasoning is based solely on statistics. They “over cheated” which is very apparent from a statistical perspective, and dare I say—it’s also able to be proven easily with some basic state voter information that is widely accessible.

6
ShortCircuits 6 points ago +7 / -1

“Fox news set to call NC for Trump in April 2021.”

6
DrMoustachio 6 points ago +7 / -1

The waiting is the hardest part.

5
fapoo 5 points ago +5 / -0

hold the line friend, the storm will be magnificent. You are witnessing history.

2
BetsyRossRocks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tom Petty has entered the chat from beyond the grave. Wonder who he voted for?

2
ArdentGrasshopper 2 points ago +2 / -0

^ this

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
Bldg_2019 3 points ago +4 / -1

Barrett is better than Ginsburg, but that’s all I know about her so far. She sat out a critical SC decision on PA voting issues just last week, and here we are. She did sail through confirmation pretty easily. Hopefully they see that Harris WILL pack the court, rendering their careers and lives meaningless.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
GretaCornburg 4 points ago +4 / -0

At some point the optics stop mattering he needs to fire everyone

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
MeatloafFvck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Biden has gotten almost 9 million more votes than Hillary in 2016.

An Almost 15% increase.

Let that sink in.

5
TrumpDynastyForever 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yea, I've been saying this for a week and I work in a kitchen.....why are people with degrees having a harder time grasping how the election works than me? Good read though, I obv agree with what's said here.

5
MuhSoy 5 points ago +5 / -0

All those “muh watermark” people have lost ALL credibility with me.

5
Regeneron2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

The author forgot about AZ, which will probably go into Trumps column soon, despite the AP having called it for sleepy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Regeneron2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like there are about 96k ballots left to count. They have to break roughly 60% for Trump from him to win. On Wednesday we had something like 400-550k votes to count. So if they keep up this counting rate AZ will go into the Trump column today or tomorrow (assuming those ballots break at 60%). Either way we are headed for an automatic recount in AZ since the margin will be below 0.5%. So media won't be forced to call it.

5
ChicagoMAGA 5 points ago +6 / -1

Saved! Great thread going on here.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
MAGAMAN300 5 points ago +5 / -0

Water Mark BS? So are you calling Tony Shaffer a reitred intel officer and a member Of President Trumps advisory board a fraud?? A man who severed his country proudly? We're free to say what we want but I think it's disrespectful especially sense he is on our side. Tony Shaffer post that repeats the same "conspiracy theory" that peoplekeep claiming is BS. Here is a tweet PRESISDENT TRUMPS ACTUAL ADVISOR, FORMER INTEL OFFICER, BEEN ON FOX NEWS PLENTY OF TIMES AND SERVEREDD HIS COUNTRY PROUDLY. He is saying the exact samething. THIS MAN HAS BEEN IN THE PRIVATE MEETINGS WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP. So maybe just maybe we don't know as much as we all think we do. Unless everyone here is prepared to call Tony Shaffer a Fraud and I'm not. Tony is on twitter trolling Democrats with this. https://twitter.com/T_S_P_O_O_K_Y/status/1324565417512357888

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
BlondeWhiteGirl4MAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah the watermark stuff was disinfo, Pieczenik is a Jewish zionist and liar, we can't trust him

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
I_am_the_Telescope 3 points ago +3 / -0

I read this early morning. Excellent article and I always follow American thinker.

3
IndelibleHippocampus 3 points ago +3 / -0

You know where this is going...

  1. Trump campaign wins after judicial rulings.
  2. Anti-Trump protests.
  3. Coup

They're one step ahead. Let's hope we're two steps ahead.

3
witchism 3 points ago +3 / -0
  1. Civil War
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Oskar64 3 points ago +3 / -0

Really liked that and set my mind at rest, thanks for the link

3
TheGipper 3 points ago +4 / -1

Biden ran his play. Now it's time to run ours. We got this.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
flyingcaveman 3 points ago +3 / -0

When did the media start with the "Trump isn't going to leave office" Bullshit? That's when they knew they would have to cheat and it would come to this.

3
RandomActuary 3 points ago +3 / -0

The fraud definitely has multiple components:

  1. Dead people voting
  2. Illegal ballot harvesting/ deadline extensions
  3. Shady/ secretive counting practices
  4. "Glitches"

I'm guessing 1-3 are very small compared with the impact of 4. Hopefully if we can show enough hard evidence for items 1-3, legal action will allow experts to evaluate 4.