The wonderful thing about this is that if (when) all of this is exposed, what actually exposed them was our overwhelming voter turnout to elect Trump. They never thought it would be such a landslide and we have exposed their algorithms as impossibilities. This is one of the downsides of real time algorithm processing.
CNN was caught with two "crawls", one a millisecond behind the other till both were in sync: the switch showed a big vote-jump, ALL for Biden. IOW, an algorithm in operation. You can see it happening here:
If you're aiming to cheat, you make sure your system doesn't have basic logic tests, checks, and balances, that outright prevent you from doing things the system does not expect.
Years ago; I worked for the British Welfare System (I know, the Irony) within the realm of systems and data integrity.
These systems have so many checks and balances that if you even try to alter something to an impossibility (E.g. Over 100%) the system will flag it as an impossibility.
If you then try and bypass it, the system will flag a calculation discrepancy.
If you then try and force it through anyway, it will escalate it to the Security and Integrity who will then review the history of this case and review why these decisions are being made.
If it then passes all of these checks, it then sends off a bug-report to the service provider, is logged within our own systems, and is then passed as an "Anomaly" to the Section 151 Officer.
After all this, it then gets passed through to Audit and is purposefully flagged for Auditors due to the sheer irregularity of it such that if they get this wrong, they would be absolutely crucified.
This doesn't mean that there aren't instances of fraud within the British Welfare system by the administration, there absolutely is, but it is so rare because of the number of external checks are so high.
There isn't a single way that Dominion systems are designed in any way other than to cheat.
Could this software also been the same software that botched the iowa caucus? Maybe they were beta testing it... And because it was the Dems... No one gave it much attention???
NO EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD, its only natural that more people vote then are actually registered to vote! if there are only 100 voters in makes sense that 200 voted! /S
The more complex a system becomes the more pieces of it may break.
This is the stick in the spokes of the front wheel of technocracy utopian dreams. For every camera in every hand and microphone in every pocket intended to monitor the public, those recording devices get turned around and catch the central planners behaving poorly.
Over and over again, someone steps in front of a camera they forgot was there. A server poorly secured leaks in the wild. The voting system developed behind closed doors has an oversight the two people who actually understand how it works didn't think of.
The failures will happen.
A concerned public needs to improve methods to go on the offense whenever one happens to exploit the unforced error.
Consider playbooks radical left have to unleash and rush forward with whenever a police shooting occurs. That's not organic. That was developed in the off hours and rolled out whenever a social event provides opportunity. That is the planning necessary to drive forward whenever the technocracy provides an unforced error event.
Fate RBG death before the Election. Wonder when she really died
Amen!
https://yournews.com/2020/11/07/1914252/operation-scorecard-cia-run-vote-theft-software-was-running-in-
Absolutely. Its only when the data updates do these folks know to get more ballots. Its AI running the show.
That’s why all these ballots only voted Biden and not down Ballot. They had to produce A LOT of fake ballots QUICK
The wonderful thing about this is that if (when) all of this is exposed, what actually exposed them was our overwhelming voter turnout to elect Trump. They never thought it would be such a landslide and we have exposed their algorithms as impossibilities. This is one of the downsides of real time algorithm processing.
Yessir
Producing fake ballots that matched ALL the election numbers would be too hard. That's why they have no down ticket votes.
CNN was caught with two "crawls", one a millisecond behind the other till both were in sync: the switch showed a big vote-jump, ALL for Biden. IOW, an algorithm in operation. You can see it happening here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=emb_title
Tweet this to @DanODonnellShow.
I don’t tweet if you want go for it
They couldn't even write their own code, they probably just relied on some clumsy CIA software.
China
Yes! Great article
https://yournews.com/2020/11/07/1914252/operation-scorecard-cia-run-vote-theft-software-was-running-in-
If you ever apply for a Software QA job, this post should be part of your application.
I still think the real count is
Trump > 70mil
Biden < 55 mil (more like less than 50)
I think vote totals are inflating why higher than they should year over year. More votes == more fraud opportunities
If you're aiming to cheat, you make sure your system doesn't have basic logic tests, checks, and balances, that outright prevent you from doing things the system does not expect.
Years ago; I worked for the British Welfare System (I know, the Irony) within the realm of systems and data integrity.
These systems have so many checks and balances that if you even try to alter something to an impossibility (E.g. Over 100%) the system will flag it as an impossibility.
If you then try and bypass it, the system will flag a calculation discrepancy.
If you then try and force it through anyway, it will escalate it to the Security and Integrity who will then review the history of this case and review why these decisions are being made.
If it then passes all of these checks, it then sends off a bug-report to the service provider, is logged within our own systems, and is then passed as an "Anomaly" to the Section 151 Officer.
After all this, it then gets passed through to Audit and is purposefully flagged for Auditors due to the sheer irregularity of it such that if they get this wrong, they would be absolutely crucified.
This doesn't mean that there aren't instances of fraud within the British Welfare system by the administration, there absolutely is, but it is so rare because of the number of external checks are so high.
There isn't a single way that Dominion systems are designed in any way other than to cheat.
Could this software also been the same software that botched the iowa caucus? Maybe they were beta testing it... And because it was the Dems... No one gave it much attention???
NO EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD, its only natural that more people vote then are actually registered to vote! if there are only 100 voters in makes sense that 200 voted! /S
The more complex a system becomes the more pieces of it may break.
This is the stick in the spokes of the front wheel of technocracy utopian dreams. For every camera in every hand and microphone in every pocket intended to monitor the public, those recording devices get turned around and catch the central planners behaving poorly.
Over and over again, someone steps in front of a camera they forgot was there. A server poorly secured leaks in the wild. The voting system developed behind closed doors has an oversight the two people who actually understand how it works didn't think of.
The failures will happen.
A concerned public needs to improve methods to go on the offense whenever one happens to exploit the unforced error.
Consider playbooks radical left have to unleash and rush forward with whenever a police shooting occurs. That's not organic. That was developed in the off hours and rolled out whenever a social event provides opportunity. That is the planning necessary to drive forward whenever the technocracy provides an unforced error event.