Maybe the Israeli pedes will be taking a closer look at their own elections. Remember that Hammer was designed to influence the elections of foreign counties.
I'm from Israel and I personally know Bibi and even had the pleasure to assist him in the last campaign. I can assure you he is on the right side. He was getting hammered here in Israel for not congratulating Joe Biden while all other world leader have.
Notice that he did not congratulate Biden for winning or for being the next president. He has been working with him professionally in the past and will continue to work with him since he is a pro. Not to mention that if the courts betray us and let Biden become the POTUS, Bibi wouldn't want to suffer a retribution that would probably affect all Israelis. I wouldn't be surprised if he pinged Trump right before that, explained that he must do it, and kept the wording vague (he could be congratulating him just for the "momentum" even if not final.)
We cannot always expect world leaders to jump into the rabbit hole with us.
No all other world leaders haven't congratulated Biden. The Mexican pres made a point to state he wouldn't congratulate anyone until it was truly over. Poland, Hungry and Brazil also haven't offered congrats to Biden. They know.
i am an Israeli state skeptic and i actually agree with everything you said, he is protecting the interests of his people, especially with how poorly FOBAMA treated them
"A few days before I faced the Judiciary Committee, Joseph Biden invited [wife] Virginia and me to tour the Caucus Room in the Russell Senate Office Building, where the hearings would take place,” Thomas wrote. “Senator Biden was reassuring, stressing that the hearings weren’t meant to be an ordeal. He said that since I’d be nervous at first, he would start the questioning with a few ‘softballs’ that would help me relax and do my best, assuring me that he had no tricks up his sleeve.”
As chairman, Biden was able to get the first questions once the hearings kicked off. Thomas wrote that, “Instead of the softball questions he’d promised to ask, he threw a beanball straight at my head, quoting from a speech I’d given four years earlier at the Pacific Legal Foundation and challenging me to defend what I’d said.” (You can watch the clip here on the C-SPAN archive.)
Biden quoted a portion of the speech in which Thomas said, “I find attractive the arguments of scholars such as Stephen Macedo, who defend an activist Supreme Court that would ... strike down laws restricting property rights.” Thomas recounted being caught off guard, because he didn’t recall the context of his remarks, which Biden suggested showed Thomas was arguing in favor of judicial activism. It wasn’t until Thomas got a chance to reread the speech during the break that he noticed Biden had neglected to quote the following sentence in his remarks, which made clear that Thomas’s point was the opposite of what Biden had claimed. Thomas had said in the speech, “But the libertarian argument overlooks the place of the Supreme Court in a scheme of separation of powers. One does not strengthen self-government and the rule of law by having the non-democratic branch of the government make policy.”
Thomas recalled, “Throughout my life I’ve often found truth embedded in the lyrics of my favorite records. At Yale, for example, I’d listened often to ‘Smiling Faces Sometimes,’ a song by the Undisputed Truth that warns of the dangers of trusting the hypocrites who ‘pretend to be your friend’ while secretly planning to do you wrong. Now I knew I’d met one of them: Senator Biden’s smooth, insincere promises that he would treat me fairly were nothing but talk.”
After his initial confirmation hearings, Thomas received a visit from the FBI asking him to respond to the Hill accusations, which he categorically denied. The one thing Thomas credits Biden for is that Hill had initially requested that her name be withheld from members of the Judiciary Committee when she submitted her statement, but Biden said he would only accept a signed statement.
Initially, the matter was supposed to be kept confidential. Ahead of the vote, Biden told Thomas on the phone that “he was torn over his decision and has brought two statements with him to the committee meeting that day, one for me and one against.” Ultimately, however, Biden said he’d have to vote against Thomas because he disagreed with his beliefs.
At the same time, however, Biden said he’d defend Thomas if the Hill story ever became public, along with another matter concerning a leaked draft opinion from the appellate court that had been drawing criticism.
“Judge, I know you don’t believe me,” Thomas recalled Biden telling him, “but if any of these last two matters come up, I will be your biggest defender.”
Thomas recounted, “He was right about one thing: I didn’t believe him. Neither did Virginia. As he reassured me of his goodwill, she grabbed a spoon from the silverware drawer, opened her mouth wide, stuck out her tongue as far as she could, and pretended to gag herself.”
Seems to have been a pubic hair on your ballots, Joe.
Yep, Harris is an AIPAC whore. And BiBi Netanyahu loves her and Biden.
I wonder if that was just a psyop to trick Trump. Talk is cheap. When push comes to shove, I see BiBi cucking for Biden.
Maybe the Israeli pedes will be taking a closer look at their own elections. Remember that Hammer was designed to influence the elections of foreign counties.
And they renamed the Golan Heights to the Trump Heights. The peopel there definately love him, but their politicians are jsu tas swampy as ours.
I'm from Israel and I personally know Bibi and even had the pleasure to assist him in the last campaign. I can assure you he is on the right side. He was getting hammered here in Israel for not congratulating Joe Biden while all other world leader have.
Notice that he did not congratulate Biden for winning or for being the next president. He has been working with him professionally in the past and will continue to work with him since he is a pro. Not to mention that if the courts betray us and let Biden become the POTUS, Bibi wouldn't want to suffer a retribution that would probably affect all Israelis. I wouldn't be surprised if he pinged Trump right before that, explained that he must do it, and kept the wording vague (he could be congratulating him just for the "momentum" even if not final.)
We cannot always expect world leaders to jump into the rabbit hole with us.
BB literally congratulated him though: https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/1325302956363812864
I love Israel, but what do you make of this Tweet?
No all other world leaders haven't congratulated Biden. The Mexican pres made a point to state he wouldn't congratulate anyone until it was truly over. Poland, Hungry and Brazil also haven't offered congrats to Biden. They know.
This makes sense thanks for the insight
i am an Israeli state skeptic and i actually agree with everything you said, he is protecting the interests of his people, especially with how poorly FOBAMA treated them
I don't know how factual it is, but this guy on Twitter says President Trump unfollowed Netanyahu:
https://realmarklutchman.wordpress.com/2020/11/09/trump-just-unfollowed-benjamin-netanyahu-on-twitter-he-will-not-forget-the-snakes/
Bibi is not in a position to have any other public opinion. He lives in the real world and is responsible for people.
Wtf?
"A few days before I faced the Judiciary Committee, Joseph Biden invited [wife] Virginia and me to tour the Caucus Room in the Russell Senate Office Building, where the hearings would take place,” Thomas wrote. “Senator Biden was reassuring, stressing that the hearings weren’t meant to be an ordeal. He said that since I’d be nervous at first, he would start the questioning with a few ‘softballs’ that would help me relax and do my best, assuring me that he had no tricks up his sleeve.”
As chairman, Biden was able to get the first questions once the hearings kicked off. Thomas wrote that, “Instead of the softball questions he’d promised to ask, he threw a beanball straight at my head, quoting from a speech I’d given four years earlier at the Pacific Legal Foundation and challenging me to defend what I’d said.” (You can watch the clip here on the C-SPAN archive.)
Biden quoted a portion of the speech in which Thomas said, “I find attractive the arguments of scholars such as Stephen Macedo, who defend an activist Supreme Court that would ... strike down laws restricting property rights.” Thomas recounted being caught off guard, because he didn’t recall the context of his remarks, which Biden suggested showed Thomas was arguing in favor of judicial activism. It wasn’t until Thomas got a chance to reread the speech during the break that he noticed Biden had neglected to quote the following sentence in his remarks, which made clear that Thomas’s point was the opposite of what Biden had claimed. Thomas had said in the speech, “But the libertarian argument overlooks the place of the Supreme Court in a scheme of separation of powers. One does not strengthen self-government and the rule of law by having the non-democratic branch of the government make policy.”
Thomas recalled, “Throughout my life I’ve often found truth embedded in the lyrics of my favorite records. At Yale, for example, I’d listened often to ‘Smiling Faces Sometimes,’ a song by the Undisputed Truth that warns of the dangers of trusting the hypocrites who ‘pretend to be your friend’ while secretly planning to do you wrong. Now I knew I’d met one of them: Senator Biden’s smooth, insincere promises that he would treat me fairly were nothing but talk.”
After his initial confirmation hearings, Thomas received a visit from the FBI asking him to respond to the Hill accusations, which he categorically denied. The one thing Thomas credits Biden for is that Hill had initially requested that her name be withheld from members of the Judiciary Committee when she submitted her statement, but Biden said he would only accept a signed statement.
Initially, the matter was supposed to be kept confidential. Ahead of the vote, Biden told Thomas on the phone that “he was torn over his decision and has brought two statements with him to the committee meeting that day, one for me and one against.” Ultimately, however, Biden said he’d have to vote against Thomas because he disagreed with his beliefs.
At the same time, however, Biden said he’d defend Thomas if the Hill story ever became public, along with another matter concerning a leaked draft opinion from the appellate court that had been drawing criticism.
“Judge, I know you don’t believe me,” Thomas recalled Biden telling him, “but if any of these last two matters come up, I will be your biggest defender.”
Thomas recounted, “He was right about one thing: I didn’t believe him. Neither did Virginia. As he reassured me of his goodwill, she grabbed a spoon from the silverware drawer, opened her mouth wide, stuck out her tongue as far as she could, and pretended to gag herself.”
It was a HEARING! CACKLE
Kavanagh is going to serve his decision at absolute zero
Starting with Vice CUNT
Clarence Thomas facing biden in a "high tech lynching"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZURHD5BU1o8&t=146s
Great man, just listen to the first couple minutes of him speaking
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CPs7f7kYHA&t=618s
Time for a high court lynching of Biden's fraudulent ballots.
Oops, didn't see that one coming.
And people are still agnostic.
i have very rarely been so captivated by someone speaking
You check out some Sowell
Thank you for the second link. Thoroughly enjoyed listening to him.
This was great, a nice break from this election stress.
Underrated comment!
Listen here fat! If you revoke my 5 million + fraudulent ballots, then you ain’t black!!
best mashup 2020
This is even funnier now cause you know those record high black votes Biden received were completely made up fake ballots.
try 20M
more like thirty million
I spot my coffee out🤣🤣🤣
Second massive KEK in this post Sunday Gun Day meme artillery addition.
I...am...dying