That's the numbers we need to get out there! The shills on twitter are saying Trump losing but the Reps winning/ keeping congressional seats is proof that there's no cheating. 100,000's of votes for just Biden and nothing else on the ticket is not normal, and does not go the other way.
Again, maths them. On top of Benford's law and other stat anomalies, when they try to argue basic probability ie that it is 'possible' for weird occurences like 100000 ballots in a row all for Biden, just apply the equation p^n where p = decimal proportion of people in the sample who will vote Biden and n = number of consecutive votes for Biden.
Even if you are generous and say they were dem ballots, you need basicaly 99.999% of dems (or p = 0.99999) to have voted for him or more to start getting a probability that isn't stupidly low (like one in the trillions of trillions or one in a centillion).
Factor into that, it happened in multiple locations, so you then need to multiply all these probabilities together to get the chance they occurred together.
So yes, it's 'possible', but one in a centillion odds are absolutely awful odds. The heat death of the universe would probably occur sooner.
Georgia is now reporting that Biden had 100,000 more total votes than Senate (D) Ossoff while Trump had only 1,000 more than (R) Perdue
That's the numbers we need to get out there! The shills on twitter are saying Trump losing but the Reps winning/ keeping congressional seats is proof that there's no cheating. 100,000's of votes for just Biden and nothing else on the ticket is not normal, and does not go the other way.
Exactly. It's the exact opposite. It makes it look MORE suspicious that Biden would have that many more total votes.
Again, maths them. On top of Benford's law and other stat anomalies, when they try to argue basic probability ie that it is 'possible' for weird occurences like 100000 ballots in a row all for Biden, just apply the equation p^n where p = decimal proportion of people in the sample who will vote Biden and n = number of consecutive votes for Biden.
Even if you are generous and say they were dem ballots, you need basicaly 99.999% of dems (or p = 0.99999) to have voted for him or more to start getting a probability that isn't stupidly low (like one in the trillions of trillions or one in a centillion).
Factor into that, it happened in multiple locations, so you then need to multiply all these probabilities together to get the chance they occurred together.
So yes, it's 'possible', but one in a centillion odds are absolutely awful odds. The heat death of the universe would probably occur sooner.
Leftists are anti math
Low info leftists that use overly reductive logic to form their arguments. It's complete nonsense.
Good question, I don’t know.
Create a new post for visibility and ask