26
Comments (7)
sorted by:
4
Slyder8 4 points ago +4 / -0

To give this cunt the benefit of the doubt... is he trying to joke around?

6
Johnkittz [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

No. Vaush has always stood by childporn not being a problem.

4
atticdweller 4 points ago +4 / -0

Holy shit. I ain't gonna be surprised when I see his mugshot on an article in the future.

3
BaritoneAssoluto 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a sicko.

3
MAGA-Rita 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy fuck. I've never watched Vaush, but I know a lot of liberals think he is a debate champion of youtube (along with destiny who has also had some controversy with minors/infidelity IIRC). OF COURSE he supports pedophilia.

"I have yet to hear a convincing moral or legal argument as to why possession child pornography should be illegal ....ACTUAL child pornography" -- Vaush

WHAT THE FUCK, children in that porn are being literally abused, likely in pain, and are forced into it, how is that not moral reason enough? Let kids be kids! Disgusting human being, how can he have any following after that.

2
actual_anon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Vaush is the stereotypical fedora athiest

1
cyber_acolyte 1 point ago +1 / -0

As an Atheist he is consistent... though as an Atheist he has no foundation for morality so there is that. He can't say something is objectively wrong.

I'm a Christian and sex with children/animals should be punished by death. Jesus said that if you look with lust you have committed adultery in your heart. Raising the standard and thus you are just as guilty as if you had committed physical adultery.

There fore even nude photos of children to please yourself to, is in the same tier as having sex with them. <- Death penalty still applies.

He also said that if anyone should harm the little ones, it would be better if a millstone where placed around their neck and be cast into the depths of the oceans. Comparing to what WILL happen to them in the hereafter. Emphasis, it would be PREFERABLE for that to happen, than what is going to happen to them.