410
Comments (21)
sorted by:
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
11
Walleyevision [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

I’m sure they know whatever I can find on google. They know everything we do and a whole lot more! The really exciting stuff is what we DONT know!!!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
MrOrangeHorseman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just sent it to Trump’s campaign. Hopefully, they’ll see it and send it to his legal team(not sure of any way of contacting them myself).

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Dirkboss 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand why they didn't at least try to have the fakes follow Benfords law too. It's not that hard to program a random number generator spitting out numbers in any distribution you like.

That's insanely sloppy of them.

2
Bruce13 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not following Benford's Law is a byproduct of how rushed and sloppy this has been. Think about it, the Dems didn't get their big opening on massive fraud until mid/late March of this year when they started the lockdowns; the impetus for mail-in ballots. They've had just 8 month's to prep this in secrecy.

2
Dirkboss 2 points ago +2 / -0

8 months should be enough to make it work like clockwork. They probably just didn't expect Trump to get 70 million + votes and had to rush in extra ballots in a few hours to days.

1
Bruce13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, yes, that's the other part of it. Their initial plan was electronic vote-pilfering from Trump in red counties. Then the results started coming in, and despite their vote switching, Trump was ahead by 6 figures in most battleground states. That's when they switched to Plan B: shut it down for the night, kick out the observers, stuff the ballots, illegally cure/fix ballots, dispose of Trump ballots, etc.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
Walleyevision [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

It doesn’t care about little faggots feelings either. That’s why math is racist

1
MostlyPeacefulMurder 1 point ago +1 / -0

For the Left Maths is part of the white supremacist patriarchy

6
RedCoast31 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sweet.

Just as a point of interest for you pede's that know the math part of this. Keep in eye out on the Wikipedia entry.

It was a high value entry before, now it's gonna fucking sky rocket.

Hold the line there

1
Dirkboss 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://youtu.be/XXjlR2OK1kM

Just see the comments here, pure gold!

1
Cakes4077 1 point ago +1 / -0

I checked out the edit history for the page for it a day or two ago. There has been an edit war going on with regards to a specific part on how Benford's law applies to elections and sentence and citation that it isn't reliable for election data.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
nufosmatic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bad data happens surprisingly often in the social sciences (see the replicability crisis).

99% of social sciences studies cannot be reproduced. 99% of those are worked with Federal dollars. Your tax dollars at work (or not)...

1
Asun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course it could. It has been routinely used to detect/prove fraud in court.

1
CLaRGe 1 point ago +1 / -0

When Thomas, Barrett, and the other three say the same then I’ll celebrate.

1
RyanUpCreek 1 point ago +1 / -0