5264
Comments (223)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
62
brainphreeze 62 points ago +63 / -1

CAN PEOPLE START POSTING WITH SOURCES FFS. Not just op, but this comments section is riddled with claims and no source... it's turning into MSM here

45
TrudopesEyebrow [S] 45 points ago +48 / -3

Are you looking for a mainstream news site link? Honest question

Are you waiting on Fox News to headline this.

We just watched a LIVE press conference from Matt Schlap and NV’s former AG, Adam Laxalt .

That’s a direct source. No fake news to filter it

33
Au_contrarian 33 points ago +33 / -0

He's not looking for MSM. Just a better identification of where this information comes from than "they."

15
Do_You_Know_The_Way 15 points ago +15 / -0

This. I myself read this and was wondering who “They” were.

-3
trozz -3 points ago +1 / -4

The direct source is there, or are you braindead enough to need it filtered through some reporter’s opinion?

9
always_never_8000 9 points ago +11 / -2

He said there have been no human eyes to verify 600,000 of the mail in ballots. He did not say that there were no signatures at all on them.

This title is misleading

1
Poltergeist 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they can't verify 600k signatures why should we verify sources?