HAHAHAH! So funny. Shows what a problem this censorship effort comes down to in both a pragmatic and a moral sense. You can't in any good faith censor a seemingly very established statistical measure that has a history of being used to detect fraud ("We believe in science"). We are not dumb fucks like the media is, so we have no problem being like, "Is that true or not true? Can we take a look at it? If no, no, if yes, yes."

This and the wikipedia editing around this are total proof this is not about "eliminating disinformation," it's about trying to keep you only exposed to certain of their pre-selected representations of reality.