46
posted ago by KafeenRush ago by KafeenRush +47 / -1

Bernie Sanders, like Donald Trump, had FAR more real-world enthusiasm and attendance support. IIRC, when Biden went on to decisively win the primaries, it was both a surprise and a sigh of relief from many establishment Democrats.

How likely is it that Democrats have been using & perfecting this 'glitchy' software to maintain victories for both D & R establishment politicians to prevent populist candidates in the future?

Comments (8)
sorted by:
4
RedCoast31 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh for sure.

They even went so far as to have multiple candidates in which to spread the votes too.

First to everyone in the primary. Then to slowly make each of them drop out.

What they couldn't plan for was actually true wild cards like Gabbard who nuked the shit out of Harris.

I wouldn't be surprised if she was actually Plan A.

2
Snoozebum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bernie won the last 2 primaries

2
smis 2 points ago +2 / -0

yes, and so did Ron Paul

2
Cheezeit7 2 points ago +2 / -0

most likely

2
stoic_troll 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, the Democrat primaries were already rigged with the concept of super delegates, the don't necessarily need to do this there, but I'm sure they have done so.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
KafeenRush [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

As much as I am against Bernie's politics, Democrats deserve the candidate they want representing them. If this is in fact true, it's horrifying to think we may effectively never have a choice of candidates again.

1
Fringe--dweller 1 point ago +1 / -0

Major election fraud has been happening for many years, look up Diebold, which morphed into the current Dominion election fraud systems.

It is the major tool of the democrats, it is how they have stolen power, every time.

Cheating IS the democrat's way.