This is pretty great evidence honestly. I would like to see all 50 states, and the rate of change in the standard deviation over time. I know the code is there, but the CSV data dump seems to be down already.
This guy did a thread on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good. If you are interested, please read it. We may be barking up the wrong tree here.
on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good
His main objection: "How the fuck do you have 77 votes 22 minutes before before you can have 11 votes?"
Easy. This is the first couple entries for PA. Election workers screwed something up in their election tabulation / edison upload and reset the system, or the first batch recorded they undid because of some procedure problem. We already know that PA is incompetent at counting/rigging votes.
idk anything about this dataset, but that objection is bunk.
I'd love it if someone could take a look and give me a second opinion, but I think this whole thing is flawed. I tried to plot the data myself, but the problem is - he's getting his numbers for each batch of votes based on the percentage of the overall vote. Which is fine at first, but once the overall vote gets larger, the percentage barely changes, since it's rounded to only 1 decimal place.
So all the mail-in ballot batches that he assumed were the same because they were "mixed together like cards" is really just because of the way the data is formatted.
But like I've said elsewhere in this thread I'm running on empty so I could be off the mark on my analysis too.
This guy did a thread on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good. If you are interested, please read it. We may be barking up the wrong tree here.
Yes! Glad I'm not going crazy. The tl;dr from his tweets:
This dataset doesn't even have the number of votes actually cast. It's
total votes cast
percentage dem
percentage rep
lots of room for error here. Once we get into the millions, we are going to miss >thousands of votes and attribute them incorrectly due to rounding. So we have >to be super careful about what conclusions we can reach using this data.
I'm really curious if someone could analyze California. Orange County had a very low turnout for Trump even though it's usually very Republican. If the Dems had to cheat even in California it would be absolutely insane.
Yea this seems pretty damn legit. The deviation in Biden ballots starts in WI right at 4am.
If we now have the data that proves how absurdly bizarre things got in Michigan and Wisconsin around that time. No question the Dems were fixing and transporting ballots in the wee hours of the morning when no one was paying attention.
I watched Bannons numbers guy lose his mind and immediately call fraud. That guy knows his shit too. It was insane and coordinated. Before the fix was in, he had a county by county analysis of every swing state ensuring a massive victory for POTUS, and saw no path for Biden. An hour later he was dumbfounded. He immediately knew.
I was watching too and he was trying to keep an objective view. Question: Were these the same 100k votes they explained away by saying they were actually reducing votes for Biden to correct some kind of error? Or was that a different instance?
A number that’s going down in history books forever - if we still have factual history books moving forward.
If you truly believe in the fraud, we gotta eat the fake coronation of Biden and stay strong. I live in a major liberal stronghold and I’m letting my buddies hold on to their fake confidence for now instead of advocating riots and looting. It all comes back to the Constitution and thank god our founding fathers were as brilliant as they were. They foresaw all of this from a mile away.
That’s why America is the envy of the entire world. We’re the last free non globalist country on the planet and everyone from globalist countries want to move here. It’s comical how it’s happening statewide here now. Californians want to move to Texas, New Yorkers wanna go to Florida. What’s the reason for these NYers and Cali defectors?; they’re jealous of freedom oriented, conservative states.
These sheep have no idea how easily they’re being moved as pawns.
When you have enough statistical anomalies, that alone is proof. What you still need is a plausible theory to explain that proof. Corrupted software may provide that
Dems were expecting a win. They got Fox and the others to call it early. Once they realized they were losing the state, they put the "fix" in without anyone paying attention.
Actually, if it makes anyone feel better, it seems as if everyone noticed. The Demtards panicked as they started seeing the election slip away and started ballot dumping in several contests almost simultaneously, becoming facepalmingly sloppy in the process. The question I have is how did they get these ballots? Wisconsin alone involved the actual creation of over 169,000 physical ballots in an incredibly short period of time. And this occurred almost instantaneously in Michigan, Pennsylvania (with an infinitely larger cache of ballots), and Georgia as well. I smell a conspiracy, friendos. This is mucho bigger than we first thought.
When they called Virginia early that was a red flag for me. Trump was up huge when they called it and I think it's just getting overlooked because PA, MI etc. are so much more obvious.
This guy did a thread on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good. If you are interested, please read it. We may be barking up the wrong tree here.
They knew they were going to lose and knew they would get caught at cheating. The whole goal was delegitimize the Trumps win. They are also buying time and hoping for a civil war. Deep state has nothing to lose at this point.
Since the ballots are randomly mixed together during transport, spanning areas occupied by multiple voting demographics, we can expect the ratio of mail-in #Biden ballots to mail-in #Trump ballots will remain relatively constant over time...
Does that actually make sense? It doesn't to me, I'd think each county would have a different ratio, but I've been trying to analyze fraud so much in the past few days that my brain is a little fried.
And also - why do the mail-in ballot batch ratios stabilize and end up being identical to the final overall state tally, every time? It's almost as if he's plotting just the standard D/R overall ratio instead, except for all the noise at the start.
His analysis seems pretty open and above board, but it just doesn't make sense to my exhausted mind. Has anyone been able to reproduce it with the data linked in this thread? Anyone have the link to the 4chan thread where he answers questions?
And also - why do the mail-in ballot batch ratios stabilize and end up being identical to the final overall state tally, every time? It's almost as if he's plotting just the standard D/R overall ratio instead, except for all the noise at the start.
Something seems off to me as well. The vote ratio should pull harder in a certain direction to actually change the election percentages and shouldn't end up with the same as the end election % result. What these numbers don't show is the volume of the batch however, which would be something else that is valuable to look at.
There seems to have been massive cheating up in NorCal that I do not thing was even known before yesterday or today. I found that many polling stations up by Redding and surrounding area, were given Sharpies only due to relatives living up there and I heard about it. Sharpies are not acceptable, they bleed thru ballot to other side, and maybe don't show up somehow when scanned, but whatever the main reason, they are not acceptable to vote with, and the polling stations in several areas were actually passing them out. The Regis. of Voters and county clerk apparently told voters who questioned it, that it was OK. Complicit or lied to themselves, IDK.
I have been told by Election Integrity Project which is working w/ POTUS Campaign, Judicial Watch, and has their own legal team, that the ballots were only to be filled out by ball point pen. Sharpie ballots in AZ were disqualified. I told her about the ones in CA as she did not know CA was involved in "Sharpiegate". I think they will be investigating.
If ANYONE used or was given a Sharpie, they must contact one of these reporting locations and report it (Trump Campaign, StoptheSteal.us, DefendYour Ballot.com, Election Integrity - CA, POTUS' attorneys 1-800-). I think POTUS might have come very close, again, to winning CA if the truth was known. he had massive support here, but don't forget, the disqualified votes disqualify all candidates down the ticket, not just POTUS, so this isn't about CA being a Blue state, & not in contention, it is VERY important that CA, & every state be checked out to see who really won -- senate and house seats, etc., etc., too!!!
This is pretty great evidence honestly. I would like to see all 50 states, and the rate of change in the standard deviation over time. I know the code is there, but the CSV data dump seems to be down already.
Here you go: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alex/nyt-2020-election-scraper/master/results.json
edit: here's an archived pdf of the csv haha https://f.maga.host/9ZrSJyZ.pdf
This guy did a thread on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good. If you are interested, please read it. We may be barking up the wrong tree here.
https://twitter.com/hyonschu/status/1325627295181103104
If you are interested in checking out what is a bigger / better scraped dataset, check this one out from Decision Desk HQ.
https://gofile.io/d/eUNz6r
His main objection: "How the fuck do you have 77 votes 22 minutes before before you can have 11 votes?"
Easy. This is the first couple entries for PA. Election workers screwed something up in their election tabulation / edison upload and reset the system, or the first batch recorded they undid because of some procedure problem. We already know that PA is incompetent at counting/rigging votes.
idk anything about this dataset, but that objection is bunk.
Well there goes my free time this week
I'd love it if someone could take a look and give me a second opinion, but I think this whole thing is flawed. I tried to plot the data myself, but the problem is - he's getting his numbers for each batch of votes based on the percentage of the overall vote. Which is fine at first, but once the overall vote gets larger, the percentage barely changes, since it's rounded to only 1 decimal place.
So all the mail-in ballot batches that he assumed were the same because they were "mixed together like cards" is really just because of the way the data is formatted.
But like I've said elsewhere in this thread I'm running on empty so I could be off the mark on my analysis too.
This guy did a thread on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good. If you are interested, please read it. We may be barking up the wrong tree here.
https://twitter.com/hyonschu/status/1325627295181103104
If you are interested in checking out what is a bigger / better scraped dataset, check this one out from Decision Desk HQ.
https://gofile.io/d/eUNz6r
Yes! Glad I'm not going crazy. The tl;dr from his tweets:
Why are u spamming this bot
I'm really curious if someone could analyze California. Orange County had a very low turnout for Trump even though it's usually very Republican. If the Dems had to cheat even in California it would be absolutely insane.
Last minute anomalous Bluewave Fuckery in OC in 2018, if memory serves.
https://archive.vn/xkfQB
Twitter thread archived
Yea this seems pretty damn legit. The deviation in Biden ballots starts in WI right at 4am.
If we now have the data that proves how absurdly bizarre things got in Michigan and Wisconsin around that time. No question the Dems were fixing and transporting ballots in the wee hours of the morning when no one was paying attention.
I was up at 4 AM and it was obvious.
I watched Bannons numbers guy lose his mind and immediately call fraud. That guy knows his shit too. It was insane and coordinated. Before the fix was in, he had a county by county analysis of every swing state ensuring a massive victory for POTUS, and saw no path for Biden. An hour later he was dumbfounded. He immediately knew.
I watched him too... his reaction was so genuine to what he was witnessing.
Rich Barris- Awesome dude. The networks were doing opposition research on him, he was so accurate.
I missed this - can I get some links or timestamps? Can't find shit on CensorTube. Would love to see this analysis
I was watching too and he was trying to keep an objective view. Question: Were these the same 100k votes they explained away by saying they were actually reducing votes for Biden to correct some kind of error? Or was that a different instance?
138,000
A number that’s going down in history books forever - if we still have factual history books moving forward.
If you truly believe in the fraud, we gotta eat the fake coronation of Biden and stay strong. I live in a major liberal stronghold and I’m letting my buddies hold on to their fake confidence for now instead of advocating riots and looting. It all comes back to the Constitution and thank god our founding fathers were as brilliant as they were. They foresaw all of this from a mile away.
That’s why America is the envy of the entire world. We’re the last free non globalist country on the planet and everyone from globalist countries want to move here. It’s comical how it’s happening statewide here now. Californians want to move to Texas, New Yorkers wanna go to Florida. What’s the reason for these NYers and Cali defectors?; they’re jealous of freedom oriented, conservative states.
These sheep have no idea how easily they’re being moved as pawns.
I hear you brother, Im in the same boat. How did we let so many people turn commies, social media is now dead to Americans.
Clearly it was obvious but we need actual evidence. We're better than them and we will do it the right way
C’mon man, Chris Wray and the FBM could have done this by....🤔....2027
When you have enough statistical anomalies, that alone is proof. What you still need is a plausible theory to explain that proof. Corrupted software may provide that
I was up till 4 am and saw it too
Same. I was livid.
Similar here in VA but for some reason nobody seems to notice/care.
Dems were expecting a win. They got Fox and the others to call it early. Once they realized they were losing the state, they put the "fix" in without anyone paying attention.
i'm so angry about VA- from Spanberger to Kaine. Disgusting. Starting to hate this state.
Actually, if it makes anyone feel better, it seems as if everyone noticed. The Demtards panicked as they started seeing the election slip away and started ballot dumping in several contests almost simultaneously, becoming facepalmingly sloppy in the process. The question I have is how did they get these ballots? Wisconsin alone involved the actual creation of over 169,000 physical ballots in an incredibly short period of time. And this occurred almost instantaneously in Michigan, Pennsylvania (with an infinitely larger cache of ballots), and Georgia as well. I smell a conspiracy, friendos. This is mucho bigger than we first thought.
Definitely. 97k votes for Biden and no downballot? Plus VA had two measures on the ballot!
Why isn’t anyone in VA challenging this?
I noticed. I think Virginia was the first one and then I was telling myself shit was gonna hit the fan.
Same.
When they called Virginia early that was a red flag for me. Trump was up huge when they called it and I think it's just getting overlooked because PA, MI etc. are so much more obvious.
i was watching va and it was solid trump for hours... then went blue. Total fraud.
Exactly! With true sample randomness, data like these can't exist https://media.thedonald.win/post/CtVHUMwK.jpeg
Just as a side note that’s the favorite hour for burglaries.
Same data for those states is in the posted Twitter thread above. He covers them all.
Correct link for CSV:
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=14566999163598825215
Somebody get this backedup at https://maga.host/
I've uploaded a copy of it here, just in case.
https://gofile.io/d/WOuvZ4
This guy did a thread on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good. If you are interested, please read it. We may be barking up the wrong tree here.
https://twitter.com/hyonschu/status/1325627295181103104
maga host only allows pdfs and images unfortunately.
That's retarded. They need to fix that.
It doesn't support the csv file type.
Probably could just change the file type, upload, then download and change back when ready to use.
I'm struggling to figure anything out from this, it seems the resolution is a bit low. Is this for 2020?
I think this is the same data.
https://is2.4chan.org/pol/1604880177664.gif
Cleaned it up: https://media.thedonald.win/post/I0ZsixzY.jpeg
explained by anon - https://i.maga.host/qeLL8tH.gif
Do you know if this data is legitimate? Did you just copy the link that the original data scientist said it is from Edison?
They knew they were going to lose and knew they would get caught at cheating. The whole goal was delegitimize the Trumps win. They are also buying time and hoping for a civil war. Deep state has nothing to lose at this point.
Its the Japanese kamikaze strategy.
Freak the allies out so that they began factoring in huge casualties.
That would never fly in a democratic republic, so the Japanese were angling for a negotiated peace. Except A bombs forced unconditional.
Commies were going to lose either way, but court decisions are like negotiated peace.
Does Trump have nukes to permanently destroy the left?
He’s sitting on so much shit to declassify that would end democrats forever.
I mean he has actual nukes. He can make me Sec Def tomorrow and I'd turn the key with him if we were hitting the deserving places.
They are dead already, they just don't know it yet.
"Trump's America", they'll say.
I shall laugh
Once again. The key was forcing a court decision. Not an obvious blowout landslide.
They can rally their troops under option 1, but 2 was extinction level.
Can you guys begin to appreciate how smart the chosen were for taking this angle?
Lose the election anyway, but preserve a 45% force factor. Remember avg iq is 103. Guys like mini Mike are 130+
Is it infallible? The basis of the analysis:
Does that actually make sense? It doesn't to me, I'd think each county would have a different ratio, but I've been trying to analyze fraud so much in the past few days that my brain is a little fried.
And also - why do the mail-in ballot batch ratios stabilize and end up being identical to the final overall state tally, every time? It's almost as if he's plotting just the standard D/R overall ratio instead, except for all the noise at the start.
His analysis seems pretty open and above board, but it just doesn't make sense to my exhausted mind. Has anyone been able to reproduce it with the data linked in this thread? Anyone have the link to the 4chan thread where he answers questions?
Something seems off to me as well. The vote ratio should pull harder in a certain direction to actually change the election percentages and shouldn't end up with the same as the end election % result. What these numbers don't show is the volume of the batch however, which would be something else that is valuable to look at.
That’s what I’m saying! All 50 states should be scrutinized.
^ Archived:
https://web.archive.org/web/20201109032830/https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1604866231896.gif
Careful with the wayback machine, I've heard they've been purging stuff. To be safe do a secondary back up on archive.is
based autists at it again
Here's a chart I made showing all 50. As the author said, most states trend like the Florida example.
There seems to have been massive cheating up in NorCal that I do not thing was even known before yesterday or today. I found that many polling stations up by Redding and surrounding area, were given Sharpies only due to relatives living up there and I heard about it. Sharpies are not acceptable, they bleed thru ballot to other side, and maybe don't show up somehow when scanned, but whatever the main reason, they are not acceptable to vote with, and the polling stations in several areas were actually passing them out. The Regis. of Voters and county clerk apparently told voters who questioned it, that it was OK. Complicit or lied to themselves, IDK.
I have been told by Election Integrity Project which is working w/ POTUS Campaign, Judicial Watch, and has their own legal team, that the ballots were only to be filled out by ball point pen. Sharpie ballots in AZ were disqualified. I told her about the ones in CA as she did not know CA was involved in "Sharpiegate". I think they will be investigating.
If ANYONE used or was given a Sharpie, they must contact one of these reporting locations and report it (Trump Campaign, StoptheSteal.us, DefendYour Ballot.com, Election Integrity - CA, POTUS' attorneys 1-800-). I think POTUS might have come very close, again, to winning CA if the truth was known. he had massive support here, but don't forget, the disqualified votes disqualify all candidates down the ticket, not just POTUS, so this isn't about CA being a Blue state, & not in contention, it is VERY important that CA, & every state be checked out to see who really won -- senate and house seats, etc., etc., too!!!