Yea this pretty much proves the same and it’s almost exclusively happening in the states that are suspect. As time went on the ratio of mail-in Biden to Trump votes kept increasing in Biden’s favor but in reality the ratio should stay consistent over time bc mail-in ballots are all mixed in together, i.e. randomized, so there’s no reason why Biden would consistently get a higher ratio as time went on UNLESS they were fixing the ballots in his favor.
One state that was graphed you could see the hour where they stopped counting with a gap then it was like they hit the Biden 1.05 x multiplier and that line held for hours.
There is so much evidence mounting now.....What happened was so goddamn fishy I had a feeling it was only a matter of time until people started figuring this stuff out. Thank god for our based Staticians.
Yea there's a zero percent chance that Black People in Atlanta are more excited about Joe Biden than Obama.
I remember hearing on one of the networks, forget which one I was watching at the time, but they were talking about how the turnout in Atlanta on election day was very underwhelming. Wish I could find that.
The point is that that wouldn't even matter. If that was the case the RATIO between the amount of Trump vs. Biden votes would remain the same.
Say (if you are willing to engage in retardation as an exercise, numbers are for illustration purposes only and not to be taken literally) that you believed the ballots went 80% Biden, 20% Trump. If this was the case you would expect to see this 80/20 split all down the line.
Now imagine if at the beginning of the count you saw a 50/50 split, and then at a certain time, say, 4 in the morning when counting votes, all of a sudden that ratio instantly jumps to a 80/20 split. It's fraud.
They’re not all bunched together though. Mail in ballots are reported by county and basically they claim Milwaukee county mail in ballots were in favor of Biden almost 5:1. Not entirely unbelievable
There are whitnesses that can verify when ballots arrived. Also, there were no Trump observers while fraud happened. Those votes will be thrown out. There must be a complete account of custody of ballots
Yeah, they'll SAY that. They'll be fucking wrong, but that won't stop them from saying it. Wisconsin Dems & Reps requested absentee ballots in almost equal numbers. Michigan Republicans outnumbered Dems in absentee requests by 4-5 points.
You are very true and is a good counter argument(and true tho)but seeing how 300~counties reported over 100% participation rate(there is the abnormally historical highs on turnout but just to be the devils judge and to show how blatantly and poor performed fraud is this i wont include)and the ration of mail in is like(i read an article of pre-voting mail ins on the app teletrader stock markets)50~REGISTERED(remember that deads and under 18y counts tho)democrat 20~REGISTERED republican and 20~ non affiliate it shows that it was a fucking joke of results
It's not that they favor Biden. It's the ratio of Biden to Trump changes over time in anomalous ways. Ways that correspond to the various shady counting pauses and changing vote counts.
Yeah. Voter turnout 5+ standard deviations above historical just doesn't happen. No matter how bad Orange Man is. People tend not to understand the math of both very large and very small numbers. This is how so many fall into COVID hype hell.
Ah that is interesting. Here in Virginia it's mostly blue and they all voted early. TDS was strong with them. So if other areas are similar it might explain to some degree why it turned when they started counting the mail ins. It's a shame the laptop stuff wasn't out sooner, when all that stuff started dropping most of the locals I know had already voted well before then.
Why fix all the races when you just need to fix a few in your old corrupt strongholds of 40+yrs or more. This was calculated to try and stay under the radar except too many dems voted trump so they haved to show 90%+ turnout just to overcome it.
Dems will say the cities are reporting later than others because duh they have more votes to count so it takes longer (I asked why they don’t hire more people to compensate and got uhhhh then they moved onto the next talking point)
Republicans say the cities report last so they know how much they have to cheat to win.
Dem excuse makes no sense. They report in batches, so they should start reporting at the same time as everyone else. It would just take longer for them to finish.
This is a valid point. Elsewhere I commented but if earlier mail-ins were all more rural and big city mail-ins were later then it could explain since big cities are more heavily dem. A better analysis might be to look at specific cities and plot those out on the graph over time. Ex: instead of plotting it for a while state just plot it for cities. That would show if specific cities increased the ratio over time.
Yea this pretty much proves the same and it’s almost exclusively happening in the states that are suspect. As time went on the ratio of mail-in Biden to Trump votes kept increasing in Biden’s favor but in reality the ratio should stay consistent over time bc mail-in ballots are all mixed in together, i.e. randomized, so there’s no reason why Biden would consistently get a higher ratio as time went on UNLESS they were fixing the ballots in his favor.
One state that was graphed you could see the hour where they stopped counting with a gap then it was like they hit the Biden 1.05 x multiplier and that line held for hours.
There is so much evidence mounting now.....What happened was so goddamn fishy I had a feeling it was only a matter of time until people started figuring this stuff out. Thank god for our based Staticians.
If you bring up this fact to a Harris/Biden supporter they'll just tell you that Trump was so hated that all votes that came in were for Biden only.
Yea there's a zero percent chance that Black People in Atlanta are more excited about Joe Biden than Obama.
I remember hearing on one of the networks, forget which one I was watching at the time, but they were talking about how the turnout in Atlanta on election day was very underwhelming. Wish I could find that.
The point is that that wouldn't even matter. If that was the case the RATIO between the amount of Trump vs. Biden votes would remain the same.
Say (if you are willing to engage in retardation as an exercise, numbers are for illustration purposes only and not to be taken literally) that you believed the ballots went 80% Biden, 20% Trump. If this was the case you would expect to see this 80/20 split all down the line.
Now imagine if at the beginning of the count you saw a 50/50 split, and then at a certain time, say, 4 in the morning when counting votes, all of a sudden that ratio instantly jumps to a 80/20 split. It's fraud.
“Check mate, bigot!!”
They’re not all bunched together though. Mail in ballots are reported by county and basically they claim Milwaukee county mail in ballots were in favor of Biden almost 5:1. Not entirely unbelievable
Completely unbelieveable
I don’t buy it but they have plausible deniability. “Biden voters are way more likely to vote by mail”
They cheated and thats why they are so desperate to hurry this up.
There are whitnesses that can verify when ballots arrived. Also, there were no Trump observers while fraud happened. Those votes will be thrown out. There must be a complete account of custody of ballots
Not when more Republican requested mail in ballots than Democrats did in Wisconsin.
Yeah, they'll SAY that. They'll be fucking wrong, but that won't stop them from saying it. Wisconsin Dems & Reps requested absentee ballots in almost equal numbers. Michigan Republicans outnumbered Dems in absentee requests by 4-5 points.
You are very true and is a good counter argument(and true tho)but seeing how 300~counties reported over 100% participation rate(there is the abnormally historical highs on turnout but just to be the devils judge and to show how blatantly and poor performed fraud is this i wont include)and the ration of mail in is like(i read an article of pre-voting mail ins on the app teletrader stock markets)50~REGISTERED(remember that deads and under 18y counts tho)democrat 20~REGISTERED republican and 20~ non affiliate it shows that it was a fucking joke of results
It's not that they favor Biden. It's the ratio of Biden to Trump changes over time in anomalous ways. Ways that correspond to the various shady counting pauses and changing vote counts.
Yeah. Voter turnout 5+ standard deviations above historical just doesn't happen. No matter how bad Orange Man is. People tend not to understand the math of both very large and very small numbers. This is how so many fall into COVID hype hell.
Would ballots with Biden-only marked skew the Benford results?
Am confident there was fraud, but wondering what excuses the D's will proffer.
Ah that is interesting. Here in Virginia it's mostly blue and they all voted early. TDS was strong with them. So if other areas are similar it might explain to some degree why it turned when they started counting the mail ins. It's a shame the laptop stuff wasn't out sooner, when all that stuff started dropping most of the locals I know had already voted well before then.
But why would Milwaukee be added so late?
Why isn’t this trend observed for big cities with mail in voting in other states?
Why fix all the races when you just need to fix a few in your old corrupt strongholds of 40+yrs or more. This was calculated to try and stay under the radar except too many dems voted trump so they haved to show 90%+ turnout just to overcome it.
Do you have the links or data that show 90% turnout ?
The second question is key. Fine... It's by counties, then why the hell isn't this visible in MN or NY or Florida?
Because this was a last-resort plan they had to resort to because Trump got more votes than their primary fraud methods could offset.
Dems will say the cities are reporting later than others because duh they have more votes to count so it takes longer (I asked why they don’t hire more people to compensate and got uhhhh then they moved onto the next talking point)
Republicans say the cities report last so they know how much they have to cheat to win.
You can make up your own mind on it.
Dem excuse makes no sense. They report in batches, so they should start reporting at the same time as everyone else. It would just take longer for them to finish.
This is a valid point. Elsewhere I commented but if earlier mail-ins were all more rural and big city mail-ins were later then it could explain since big cities are more heavily dem. A better analysis might be to look at specific cities and plot those out on the graph over time. Ex: instead of plotting it for a while state just plot it for cities. That would show if specific cities increased the ratio over time.