Why fix all the races when you just need to fix a few in your old corrupt strongholds of 40+yrs or more. This was calculated to try and stay under the radar except too many dems voted trump so they haved to show 90%+ turnout just to overcome it.
There have been multiple posts here breaking the data down from those who either purchased access to the databases of PA and GA and posted it with graphs compared to 2016, or you can go to the state elections websites and check it yourself. Not to mention the dozens of graphs that keep getting posted here. Do you even browse and read or just read the title?
I read it but I haven’t saved all of it yet. Also, the ones that posted the database access - they just posted that they had it, there was no analysis or graphs done at the time. I don’t want to be reinventing the wheel or purchasing the same stuff if others already have it, either.
Dems will say the cities are reporting later than others because duh they have more votes to count so it takes longer (I asked why they don’t hire more people to compensate and got uhhhh then they moved onto the next talking point)
Republicans say the cities report last so they know how much they have to cheat to win.
Dem excuse makes no sense. They report in batches, so they should start reporting at the same time as everyone else. It would just take longer for them to finish.
But why would Milwaukee be added so late?
Why isn’t this trend observed for big cities with mail in voting in other states?
Why fix all the races when you just need to fix a few in your old corrupt strongholds of 40+yrs or more. This was calculated to try and stay under the radar except too many dems voted trump so they haved to show 90%+ turnout just to overcome it.
Do you have the links or data that show 90% turnout ?
Wisconsin was I believe 89.3% turnout. Historically they are I believe 66.7%. You can easily look it up on the states website.
Ok, thank you
Original showing up to 200% turnout https://archive.vn/BqBZY
Updated once eyebrows were raised https://mkecitywire.com/stories/564495243-analysis-seven-milwaukee-wards-report-more-2020-presidential-votes-than-registered-voters-biden-nets-146k-votes-in-city
There have been multiple posts here breaking the data down from those who either purchased access to the databases of PA and GA and posted it with graphs compared to 2016, or you can go to the state elections websites and check it yourself. Not to mention the dozens of graphs that keep getting posted here. Do you even browse and read or just read the title?
I read it but I haven’t saved all of it yet. Also, the ones that posted the database access - they just posted that they had it, there was no analysis or graphs done at the time. I don’t want to be reinventing the wheel or purchasing the same stuff if others already have it, either.
The second question is key. Fine... It's by counties, then why the hell isn't this visible in MN or NY or Florida?
Because this was a last-resort plan they had to resort to because Trump got more votes than their primary fraud methods could offset.
Exactly. There isn't a statistical reason.
Oh, definitely a reason, but not a natural one.
Dems will say the cities are reporting later than others because duh they have more votes to count so it takes longer (I asked why they don’t hire more people to compensate and got uhhhh then they moved onto the next talking point)
Republicans say the cities report last so they know how much they have to cheat to win.
You can make up your own mind on it.
Dem excuse makes no sense. They report in batches, so they should start reporting at the same time as everyone else. It would just take longer for them to finish.