Yea there's a zero percent chance that Black People in Atlanta are more excited about Joe Biden than Obama.
I remember hearing on one of the networks, forget which one I was watching at the time, but they were talking about how the turnout in Atlanta on election day was very underwhelming. Wish I could find that.
The point is that that wouldn't even matter. If that was the case the RATIO between the amount of Trump vs. Biden votes would remain the same.
Say (if you are willing to engage in retardation as an exercise, numbers are for illustration purposes only and not to be taken literally) that you believed the ballots went 80% Biden, 20% Trump. If this was the case you would expect to see this 80/20 split all down the line.
Now imagine if at the beginning of the count you saw a 50/50 split, and then at a certain time, say, 4 in the morning when counting votes, all of a sudden that ratio instantly jumps to a 80/20 split. It's fraud.
This is true. In statistics, once you have a large enough sample size (1 million votes), you should be able to generalize for the population with some degree of certainty, and obtain what the average for each data set will be.
Mail in votes may favor one candidate, but not to the extent that it would skew the data so strongly that you could no longer generalize for the population.
If you bring up this fact to a Harris/Biden supporter they'll just tell you that Trump was so hated that all votes that came in were for Biden only.
Yea there's a zero percent chance that Black People in Atlanta are more excited about Joe Biden than Obama.
I remember hearing on one of the networks, forget which one I was watching at the time, but they were talking about how the turnout in Atlanta on election day was very underwhelming. Wish I could find that.
Even Kanye and Jo should have got votes at those numbers
The point is that that wouldn't even matter. If that was the case the RATIO between the amount of Trump vs. Biden votes would remain the same.
Say (if you are willing to engage in retardation as an exercise, numbers are for illustration purposes only and not to be taken literally) that you believed the ballots went 80% Biden, 20% Trump. If this was the case you would expect to see this 80/20 split all down the line.
Now imagine if at the beginning of the count you saw a 50/50 split, and then at a certain time, say, 4 in the morning when counting votes, all of a sudden that ratio instantly jumps to a 80/20 split. It's fraud.
Thank you for making me laugh, I needed that.
This is true. In statistics, once you have a large enough sample size (1 million votes), you should be able to generalize for the population with some degree of certainty, and obtain what the average for each data set will be.
Mail in votes may favor one candidate, but not to the extent that it would skew the data so strongly that you could no longer generalize for the population.
“Check mate, bigot!!”