This guy did a thread on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good. If you are interested, please read it. We may be barking up the wrong tree here.
It did it in VA too, which suggests that there could be some artifact it picks up, or indeed that VA was the subject of fraud, though it hasn't been challenged yet.
Check out the Virginia voting by time. It is 100% fake
Trump was leading for a loooong, long time
When he was leading, I checked all the biggest counties that had the most uncounted votes. Almost alll of them voted for Trump in 2016, and that is why I declared Trump to win Virginia.
But by some miracle, Biden ended up winning Virginia. There is 100% some fraud going on in there. Did they use machines, or count by hand?
If no one has counted by hand, how can anyone really know that the Virginia numbers haven't just been made up?
If the data is faulty, why does it produce consistent graphs in every state except fraud states???
It doesn't, I don't think he bothered to check. Here's a quick Tennessee I did, and it looks like Wyoming would produce a similar shape, and that's just from the start of the database.
on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good
His main objection: "How the fuck do you have 77 votes 22 minutes before before you can have 11 votes?"
Easy. This is the first couple entries for PA. Election workers screwed something up in their election tabulation / edison upload and reset the system, or the first batch recorded they undid because of some procedure problem. We already know that PA is incompetent at counting/rigging votes.
idk anything about this dataset, but that objection is bunk.
This guy did a thread on why the NYT "Edison" scraped dataset is no good. If you are interested, please read it. We may be barking up the wrong tree here.
https://twitter.com/hyonschu/status/1325627295181103104
If you are interested in checking out what is a bigger / better scraped dataset, check this one out from Decision Desk HQ.
https://gofile.io/d/eUNz6r
It did it in VA too, which suggests that there could be some artifact it picks up, or indeed that VA was the subject of fraud, though it hasn't been challenged yet.
VA was called wayyy early with AZ if you recall.
VA Peds here. I am 100% sure there was fuckery here.
Check out the Virginia voting by time. It is 100% fake
Trump was leading for a loooong, long time
When he was leading, I checked all the biggest counties that had the most uncounted votes. Almost alll of them voted for Trump in 2016, and that is why I declared Trump to win Virginia.
But by some miracle, Biden ended up winning Virginia. There is 100% some fraud going on in there. Did they use machines, or count by hand?
If no one has counted by hand, how can anyone really know that the Virginia numbers haven't just been made up?
It doesn't, I don't think he bothered to check. Here's a quick Tennessee I did, and it looks like Wyoming would produce a similar shape, and that's just from the start of the database.
Here's PA vs FL and OH. https://media.thedonald.win/post/I0ZsixzY.jpeg
Btw, if you mean “guy who posted the link,” then...
Seriously. Post history indicates only copy pasta objection to the data source.
Nothing suspicious there. <MassiveEyeRoll>
“Hello, fellow millipedes! Trust my true and honest advising!”
His main objection: "How the fuck do you have 77 votes 22 minutes before before you can have 11 votes?"
Easy. This is the first couple entries for PA. Election workers screwed something up in their election tabulation / edison upload and reset the system, or the first batch recorded they undid because of some procedure problem. We already know that PA is incompetent at counting/rigging votes.
idk anything about this dataset, but that objection is bunk.