6652
Comments (289)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
89
NomadicKrow 89 points ago +89 / -0

There's also things like "I was recording this for notes that I could review later." You can also determine if they have a reasonable expectation of privacy. They do not. This is how Wal-Mart records you without permission while you shop.

I've read a book or two on private investigator training because I want to take the test in my state at some point. One book I read talked about recording someone through their window and it was admissible in court. They didn't bother to draw the curtains and they did what they were doing in plain view of the window. Had hey drawn their curtains they would have an expectation of privacy.

I don't really think the two-party consent laws will defend them against this recording. No one in that room had an expectation of privacy.

26
Sl0re10 26 points ago +26 / -0

That can probably help protect you from future prosecution after the Judge allows your recording.

34
deleted 34 points ago +35 / -1
13
lixa 13 points ago +13 / -0

Kind of really want to pretend to be a worried Biden supporter on social media and bring this stuff up to show my friends “out of concern” like what are the chances his “victory” could be overturned but also totally can’t stomach it. Is that wrong?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Aoikaze2000 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's best to let them be for the moment... good thing to point out AFTER GEOTUS makes his move.

That should also help maximize your salt returns =)

2
DJT_JR6544 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then again, if you do not do it, then maybe the left does not discover this and prepare for court with it. Big brain.

2
pepe_sanchez 2 points ago +2 / -0

The smart ones would call you a concern troll.

2
Proda 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not wrong at all. It's super smart.

8
deleted 8 points ago +10 / -2