158
I love you pedes. Look at this stuff. (media.patriots.win) 🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by weltbild +158 / -0
Comments (12)
sorted by:
6
testingonetwothree 6 points ago +6 / -0

153710-15371=138339 holy crap a literal 2nd grader could have caught this! I guess I overestimated the left's intelligence.. are they not blatantly changing the numbers so they have an excuse in the event of a recount or something? They are terrible at fraud!

5
zteollie 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wow, has this already gone to trump?

if you have a source please post.

Godspeed!

1
weltbild [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

from all I know this is the official story

3
BeanSauce 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is this right? I thought the typo was the 138,000? Or am I missing something

1
weltbild [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

didnt they have two typos? https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/04/fact-check-typo-led-false-post-michigan-votes-biden/6164385002/

Among those who spotted the error quickly was Ian Goldstein, who says he participates in political betting and prediction markets and uses the name @ENGOLD. He says he saw the error on the media site DecisionDeskHQ which had received the information from Shiawassee County. The county had erroneously plugged in the number 153,710 for Biden instead of the accurate 15,371. As a result, Biden's total quickly ballooned not only in the county tally, but also in the statewide tally.

and

The social media claims were accompanied with screenshots of vote tallies showing an addition of 138,339 votes for Biden, but none for anyone else. The screenshots showed no time stamp nor indicated who had posted the vote tallies.

1
BeanSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't see anything about a glitch adding 138,000 votes. Antrim had one that flipped like 6,000 though. If I'm missing something point it out. Just don't want fake info. They will discredit us immediately

1
weltbild [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

the 138k was shown on the result pages

1
BeanSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there an article that talks about the glitch on the results page? I can spread it all around for the normies. Make it obvious lol

1
weltbild [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

other pede wrote this


it's correct.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/04/technology/biden-michigan-votes.html New York Times link for the brainwashed.

Read carefully. How does it make any sense that they mistakenly entered 153710 instead of 15371 but the number jumped by 138339?

The official excuse does not make any sense. If you mistakenly enter 153710 and then correct to 15371 the total number will go DOWN by 138339 NOT UP.

Had you mistakently entered 153710 as claimed the number would go up by 153710

BEFORE

Donald J. Trump 2 200 902

Joe Biden 1 992 356

Jo Jorgensen 49 198

Howie Hawkins 10 559

Don Blankenship 6 549

AFTER

Donald J. Trump 2 200 902

Joe Biden 2 130 695

Jo Jorgensen 49 198

Howie Hawkins 10 559

Don Blankenship 6 549

138339 votes added to Joe Biden only yet the official excuse is that 153710 were entered by mistake :o.

1
BeanSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't subscribe to NYT. So it's saying even though they fixed the typo, the results were still shown as jumping 138,000 and not being corrected? Sorry if I'm being slow, but the article I read just mentions they fixed the typo. Nothing about the jump in the state count. The article I read will just make people think this is all fake... (I personally think its very real) I have to show them how even though the typo was fixed, the overall count in the state for Biden jumped by that 138,000... hope that makes sense

1
weltbild [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Among those who spotted the error quickly was Ian Goldstein, who says he participates in political betting and prediction markets and uses the name @ENGOLD. He says he saw the error on the media site DecisionDeskHQ which had received the information from Shiawassee County. The county had erroneously plugged in the number 153,710 for Biden instead of the accurate 15,371. As a result, Biden's total quickly ballooned not only in the county tally, but also in the statewide tally

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/04/fact-check-typo-led-false-post-michigan-votes-biden/6164385002/